Poythress and Wiltjer really did not sit on the bench. Wiltjer may have predicted the bench for himself, but that probably was from a lack of confidence. Poythress was benched by injury. But, the guy was poised to be a leader last year on one of the deepest teams of talent in UK history. If you follow recruiting, you know Marcus Lee came to UK as a bench player behind more experienced talent. Without assuming your intention, your premise behind those guys seems flawed.
My point is that I don't believe it's a bad thing when coaches in football and basketball "recruit-over" players. And when I say "recruit-over", I mean with the intention of building depth to strengthen the team. As we all know, injuries do happen and it's nice to have depth. You can never have too much talent. I think it's great that football programs like LSU, Ohio State, FSU, Bama, etc., have blue-chip prospects that provide quality depth and strengthen the team. I think it's a great thing in basketball, too. Just look at UK. They have 5-star and high 4-star players that come off the bench. That is one of the main reasons why they have made deep runs in the tournament under Cal, especially over the last 3 years. I don't get why people act like Cal is the devil for stocking his roster with talent. Same with Jimbo Fisher, Urban Meyer, and Nick Saban.
Jauk points out the "recruiting-over" with certain football programs, but he seems to think it might be a negative when it comes to recruiting players to join stacked rosters. He's a very intelligent poster, and is also consistent. Because he is consistent and not a hypocrite, I assume he feels the same way about basketball programs that load up (Duke, UK, Kansas, etc.). I just find that to be interesting. Isn't it the job of a HC to make sure that their roster is as talented as possible? In-game coaching is only part of what wins. You need talent as well.