Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Texas at Ohio State: Live updates, score, highlights from top-5 matchup
On3:
The Battle of Death Valley: Why LSU-Clemson is the juiciest game this jam-packed Saturday
On3:
Julian Sayin: How coaches and scouts size up Ohio State's quarterback ahead of first start
On3:
Is it time to join the Auburn hype train after Tigers roughed up Baylor in Waco?
On3:
Lee Corso makes final headgear pick, ESPN College GameDay predicts Week 1 slate
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Answer this honestly
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OmarLittle_rivals22798" data-source="post: 129402930" data-attributes="member: 1377773"><p>This is flawed logic though.</p><p>What if for the next 10 years WVU is still not a top 25 team. And half the conference is.</p><p>according to this train of thought, losing to the half conference would be just fine because rankings have it that way and they aren't 'bad losses'.</p><p></p><p>You are just ignoring the bigger question, why in 4th year is it ok to have questions to, according to you, the entire offense except RB. For a coach who was supposed to be one of the best offensive minds in football. is it ok to be 14-21 pt underdogs to half the conference this far into his tenure?</p><p></p><p>If Oklahoma and Texas were running people over like FSU and Clemson in the ACC and OSU/MSU in the big 10...fine. Have to find a way to compete with the big name programs. But its TCU who just came in the conference when we did and Baylor, who has a history of 2-5 win seasons for decades. If they can, WVU sure as hell can. And just my opinion, it takes a different path than the one currently being traveled.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OmarLittle_rivals22798, post: 129402930, member: 1377773"] This is flawed logic though. What if for the next 10 years WVU is still not a top 25 team. And half the conference is. according to this train of thought, losing to the half conference would be just fine because rankings have it that way and they aren't 'bad losses'. You are just ignoring the bigger question, why in 4th year is it ok to have questions to, according to you, the entire offense except RB. For a coach who was supposed to be one of the best offensive minds in football. is it ok to be 14-21 pt underdogs to half the conference this far into his tenure? If Oklahoma and Texas were running people over like FSU and Clemson in the ACC and OSU/MSU in the big 10...fine. Have to find a way to compete with the big name programs. But its TCU who just came in the conference when we did and Baylor, who has a history of 2-5 win seasons for decades. If they can, WVU sure as hell can. And just my opinion, it takes a different path than the one currently being traveled. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Answer this honestly
Top
Bottom