You know what also isn't open to interpretation???

Christian as well, but I believe Hamm is a little far out there. I understand his thought process on how he believes the Earth is only however many thousand years old, but it just isn't so. Carbon dating has blown that theory all to crap. And dinosaurs? Really? Dinosaurs on the freaking ark? Dude...come on lol.Christian as well but I disagree.
Christian as well, but I believe Hamm is a little far out there. I understand his thought process on how he believes the Earth is only however many thousand years old, but it just isn't so. Carbon dating has blown that theory all to crap. And dinosaurs? Really? Dinosaurs on the freaking ark? Dude...come on lol.
I take the entire Bible literal...in meaning. Some things in the Old Testemant IMO are more about teaching a lesson or moral, but who I am to say if they did or did not happen. The New Testemant is word for word the truth of what happened and is told in a more historical account and revelation of future happenings.Ahem, UKO very clearly explained at the top of the page that the Bible must be interpreted literally. Consider this your warning, philistine. Get in line.
Christian as well, but I believe Hamm is a little far out there. I understand his thought process on how he believes the Earth is only however many thousand years old, but it just isn't so. Carbon dating has blown that theory all to crap. And dinosaurs? Really? Dinosaurs on the freaking ark? Dude...come on lol.
Same here man. People get too caught up on technicalities and details. Ima do what I think is right and let the big man sort out all of the little things.I believe in the word. I'm not taking a position on the exact date of the earth. I'll leave it to humans to put faith in humans and I'll do my thing.
I am a Christian, but even I do not believe the literal story of the Ark, nor of the Garden of Eden. Believe it to be an allegory of the creation. There is a lot of the Bible that is not literal, and was not meant to be literal, e.g., the story of Job, that is a bet between God and Satan as to what will happen to Job if you take away all his family and possessions. Do not believe that really happened.
I really do believe in the New Testament
That being said, I will not go see the Ark, and have never been to the Creation Museum either.
No offense T. You are great poster, especially on the FB board. But it's interesting to me how people pick and choose what parts of the bible they want to believe. The new rage is to distance yourself from the old testament but believe the new. I find that odd. You either believe the entire book is real or the entire book is fake, IMO.
I understand distancing yourself from the murder, rape, genocide, slavery, etc. approved by the god of the bible in the old testament. But it's same god described in the new. You are either all in or you are not. Picking and choosing what fits in today's society is pretty weak, IMO.
I'm not a believer but true and fake aren't the only options.. If you demand a singular, consistent, inerrant literalism you're going to twist yourselves into knots to have it make sense, but there are other ways of reading it.
Then you are not a Christian. IMO
Old Testament only guy right here. New Testament is for pussies.I didn't intend to insinuate either all of it is true or all of it fake. I was more heading a long the lines of believers only believing the good stuff but discounting the bad. The old testament is crazy and has a lot of bad things in it (as stated earlier, god sanctioned slavery, genocide, rape, murder, etc.). The "en vogue" thing seems to be to poo poo on the old testament while pointing to the new testament as to what you believe in. That's weak.
I don't think God ever sanctioned slavery in the Bible.I didn't intend to insinuate either all of it is true or all of it fake. I was more heading a long the lines of believers only believing the good stuff but discounting the bad. The old testament is crazy and has a lot of bad things in it (as stated earlier, god sanctioned slavery, genocide, rape, murder, etc.). The "en vogue" thing seems to be to poo poo on the old testament while pointing to the new testament as to what you believe in. That's weak.
I don't think God ever sanctioned slavery in the Bible.
Old Testament only guy right here. New Testament is for pussies.
Thank you for the theology lesson, you narcissistic numbnuts.
How do you get thru the day w/ such a sour attitude?
It's cool. They're concubines. Solomon had like 300. Cole probably needs to step his game up if wants that King David kind of favor.Cole follows the bible but has extra marital affairs? What's Stonewall gonna say about that?
Uh-oh. Doesn't look good.
An atheist always tried to define Gods meaning and of course everyone of them is a biblical scholar.
Research the concept of God vs. Slavery, from an actual scholar of the bible. For anyone that read that above. I won't get into it.
Just imagine the types of Pokemon you'd find hiding around the Arkanyone claimed the Pokémon GO trainer gym at the Ark Park yet?
An atheist always tried to define Gods meaning and of course everyone of them is a biblical scholar.
Research the concept of God vs. Slavery, from an actual scholar of the bible. For anyone that read that above. I won't get into it.
Cole follows the bible but has extra marital affairs? What's Stonewall gonna say about that?
Uh-oh. Doesn't look good.
You do realize most "bible scholars" aren't neutral? They are believers therefore, they are going to twist words and meanings more than your best politicians to try and not look like idiots for following a god that advocates the above.
But hey, I am open minded. Can you explain the true meaning of Exodus chapter 21, verse 1?
I also think that if we waited to teach religion to adults instead of indoctrinating toddlers, the participation rate would be much lower because religion requires one to completely set aside their critical thinking abilities to buy into such supernatural occurrences.
There is no way to have a meaningful conversation about the various meanings of Biblical verses on a message board. That being said, you have to understand context and history when reading the Bible. I am certainly no expert, but while the Hebrews were freed from slavery, they had a system in place where Hebrews could become servants, or slaves, of other Hebrews under certain circumstances. For example, if you owed debt that you couldn't pay, you could sell yourself into slavery and use your skills, or labor, to pay off your debt. When the debt was paid, you were no longer a servant to the person you were serving. Certain crimes could also be paid off in this way. For example, if you stole a cow and slaughtered it and couldn't afford to pay the owner the value of the cow, then you could work off the debt as a servant of someone. So slavery in those verses isn't the kind of slavery you are thinking about to begin with.You do realize most "bible scholars" aren't neutral? They are believers therefore, they are going to twist words and meanings more than your best politicians to try and not look like idiots for following a god that advocates the above.
But hey, I am open minded. Can you explain the true meaning of Exodus chapter 21, verse 1?
Well I don't guess I need educated opinions on the matter. I've got Ron E Jones here, he knows his bible.
do you really think you, or any other hardened agnostic is "neutral" on the topic? Your kind will twist and misinterpret words and meanings without even knowing what you're talking about. You think you can just read a passage and suddenly you understand Gods meaning with no study.
But that's the last I'll say on it. Putting faith in humans is what's floating the boat today, just like the bible predicted. I won't try and stop the inevitable.
There are two of each of them. BOOM!!Just imagine the types of Pokemon you'd find hiding around the Ark
There is no way to have a meaningful conversation about the various meanings of Biblical verses on a message board. That being said, you have to understand context and history when reading the Bible. I am certainly no expert, but while the Hebrews were freed from slavery, they had a system in place where Hebrews could become servants, or slaves, of other Hebrews under certain circumstances. For example, if you owed debt that you couldn't pay, you could sell yourself into slavery and use your skills, or labor, to pay off your debt. When the debt was paid, you were no longer a servant to the person you were serving. Certain crimes could also be paid off in this way. For example, if you stole a cow and slaughtered it and couldn't afford to pay the owner the value of the cow, then you could work off the debt as a servant of someone. So slavery in those verses isn't the kind of slavery you are thinking about to begin with.
Second, in spite of your commentary, the Bible does not endorse slavery in the verses you site, or anywhere. Discussing the laws surrounding slavery in no way implies endorsement of the practice. Check out 1 Timothy 8:11 and see how slave trading is characterized.