Science is the sole proven authority for revealing the mysteries of the cosmos. Religion pretends to be the sole authority, but only provides false, absurd mythological explanations. As long as this is understood, there is no conflict. Ignorant religious believers and wacko leaders like Ken Ham who try to use religion in the business of science are who cause conflict.
Agree.
I believe there are two types of religious people tho.
A. Those who use religion as a way to channel themselves when they have some sort of spirituality, or in other words it's their way of helping them process an interaction from the environment that provokes emotion. You don't have to be religious to be spiritual, especially if you realize all things in the universe are made from the same things.
Then there's B. People who use religion and the bible as a textbook or science of what happened. Unfortunately for these people, who believe God is mysterious, through time their religion will constantly diminish as science keeps knocking pillars out of it to prove what really happened.
I think religion is a part of the human evolution process to describe how we interpreted things when we didn't understand them.
My favorite fantasy comeback from religious people is "oh so it just happened".. well of course we don't fully understand all the things of the universe yet as we progress through science, but theres alot of evidence which supports most of how things work. ...that would be like asking Moses to explain why we didnt always get static shock. Since he doesn't get static shock he would assume that it's not something that exists and there's nothing needed to prevent it. Or he would just say only God shocks people if he wishes. But it does exist and it is prevented by.....protons.
Plus, if "i bet it just happened" is the scholarly comeback, well a magical invisible wizard made it, who by the way..he himself "just existed" doesn't sound much better.