Same here. That's good looking!I like MState Bully at midfield.
I like the size of the logo but would still rather have the banner with the M. I don't hate the standing bulldog. Field looks good.
I do too. I wish we'd used that logo on the alternate helmets instead of the oversized one we did.
I guess I'm in the minority, but I wish we would get something nice an stick with it.I like MState Bully at midfield.
I miss the maroon end zones, filled corner to corner. Those always looked very good in my opinion.
I miss the maroon end zones, filled corner to corner. Those always looked very good in my opinion.
I do too. I wish we'd used that logo on the alternate helmets instead of the oversized one we did.
The quality of the turf took a big hit when they resodded it, IMO. They did not use the same grass that was on it (the previous turf was developed at MSU). They took a cheaper route this time. A few weeks ago when I saw the field, it looked awful.
The quality of the turf took a big hit when they resodded it, IMO. They did not use the same grass that was on it (the previous turf was developed at MSU). They took a cheaper route this time. A few weeks ago when I saw the field, it looked awful.
Yep, that one is hard to understand. There are two MSU developed grasses within 25 miles of campus, but they went a cheaper route on DNF and Davis. You'd think they would have done differently.That's CRAZY! How can we come up with our own type of grass/turf (called MSU Express, I believe) and not even use it? I too prefer the maroon end zones.
Those can only be done a couple times a year for us because they are really tough on the grass...
Then how does Tennessee do it every game when they have a stadium that blocks out more sunlight than ours?
In terms of turf health, then, white is best, followed by yellow, orange, and the rest of the rainbow. The Pack and the Heels are in the middle of the photosynthesis pack, while the Blue Devils, Gamecocks and Seminoles lag far behind. “What is so exciting about our research is that it supports what ACC and NFL field managers routinely tell us regarding which colors impact their fields the most,” says Reynolds.
Anotherwords.
Not to be a jerk or anything but you use this word a lot and it is not a word.
Eng, it's not a posting style, it's just bad English. Properly, the phrase is "in other words". Presumably as an engineer, as am I, you should know that. Not quite the same as a typo.
Another irritant, not that you do it, but some do, is "I would of known" for "I would have known".
Thanks for this tremendous contribution to the thread. I love when people critique my various posting styles while adding nothing of substance or even attempting to debate. Would you like to run through all the errors in your recent posts? That's the problem with pointing fingers, grammar police**
This post had a humerous affect.So, anotherwords, you could care less for his impact on the current discussion.