Anyone else notice anything peculiar about Trumplethinskin's statement on

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,991
1,921
113
If Donnie Bone Spur grabbed your mommy's "*****", or ("your Wife or Daughter, or Sister"), you'd.... what? Get on yours knees and kiss his shoes, after a big sniff of his back side? What would you do?

Trump: Grab ’em by the *****. You can do anything.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

You try it and get kicked in your scrotum don't 'ya Best Virginia?

You're jealous.

Trump goes after hot chicks who won't even look your way, and you still get punked by 300lb lard asses who end up dating the guys who ride on the back of sanitation trucks, dip skoal, and smell like African Wildebeasts.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,991
1,921
113
This EO would compel locals to actively become immigration officers. They would have to actively pursue illegals otherwise they'd lose federal funds. Geez, It ain't hard.

OK, so if this is true, enforce the Law or cut off the Federal money, then send in the National Guard to get the criminals.

I'm not sure what you're advocating here RPJ, but it sure doesn't sound like enforcing the Law is job #1.
 

TarHeelEer

Redshirt
Dec 15, 2002
89,286
37
48
Not making anything up. This EO would compel locals to actively become immigration officers. They would have to actively pursue illegals otherwise they'd lose federal funds. Geez, It ain't hard.

Which part of the text of the EO does this? I'll help. Here is the verbiage in different sections related to local jurisdictions:

(c) Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;

(c) To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA in a manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws for that jurisdiction.
Sec. 9. Sanctuary Jurisdictions. It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure, to the fullest extent of the law, that a State, or a political subdivision of a State, shall comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373.

(a) In furtherance of this policy, the Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary. The Secretary has the authority to designate, in his discretion and to the extent consistent with law, a jurisdiction as a sanctuary jurisdiction. The Attorney General shall take appropriate enforcement action against any entity that violates 8 U.S.C. 1373, or which has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prevents or hinders the enforcement of Federal law.
 
Dec 7, 2010
20,602
120
0
OK, so if this is true, enforce the Law or cut off the Federal money, then send in the National Guard to get the criminals.

I'm not sure what you're advocating here RPJ, but it sure doesn't sound like enforcing the Law is job #1.
Really? Do you think the 3 Texas sheriffs also don't want to enforce the laws too? You people have one way of viewing the world and you absolutely have no ability to see anything from a perspective not in your narrow world view. It's all black and white to you narrow-minded jackasses. Have a good day dumbass.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,991
1,921
113
Which part of the text of the EO does this? I'll help. Here is the verbiage in different sections related to local jurisdictions:

(c) Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;

(c) To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA in a manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws for that jurisdiction.
Sec. 9. Sanctuary Jurisdictions. It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure, to the fullest extent of the law, that a State, or a political subdivision of a State, shall comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373.

(a) In furtherance of this policy, the Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary. The Secretary has the authority to designate, in his discretion and to the extent consistent with law, a jurisdiction as a sanctuary jurisdiction. The Attorney General shall take appropriate enforcement action against any entity that violates 8 U.S.C. 1373, or which has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prevents or hinders the enforcement of Federal law.

You're wasting your time TarHeelEer trying to talk RPJ into enforcing the Law.

He's all for illegals staying here, voting Democrat, inviting their friends in, and turning America inside out with crime just so he can cheer them on and blame Trump for doing nothing about them.
 
Dec 7, 2010
20,602
120
0
Which part of the text of the EO does this? I'll help. Here is the verbiage in different sections related to local jurisdictions:

(c) Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;

(c) To the extent permitted by law, the Secretary may structure each agreement under section 287(g) of the INA in a manner that provides the most effective model for enforcing Federal immigration laws for that jurisdiction.
Sec. 9. Sanctuary Jurisdictions. It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure, to the fullest extent of the law, that a State, or a political subdivision of a State, shall comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373.

(a) In furtherance of this policy, the Attorney General and the Secretary, in their discretion and to the extent consistent with law, shall ensure that jurisdictions that willfully refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (sanctuary jurisdictions) are not eligible to receive Federal grants, except as deemed necessary for law enforcement purposes by the Attorney General or the Secretary. The Secretary has the authority to designate, in his discretion and to the extent consistent with law, a jurisdiction as a sanctuary jurisdiction. The Attorney General shall take appropriate enforcement action against any entity that violates 8 U.S.C. 1373, or which has in effect a statute, policy, or practice that prevents or hinders the enforcement of Federal law.
Really? How about: "(c) Ensure that jurisdictions that fail to comply with applicable Federal law do not receive Federal funds, except as mandated by law;"
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,991
1,921
113
Really? Do you think the 3 Texas sheriffs also don't want to enforce the laws too? You people have one way of viewing the world and you absolutely have no ability to see anything from a perspective not in your narrow world view. It's all black and white to you narrow-minded jackasses. Have a good day dumbass.

Why don't you give me your address RPJ, I know a couple of illegal drug runners who need a place to set up operations.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,170
819
113
Not making anything up. This EO would compel locals to actively become immigration officers. They would have to actively pursue illegals otherwise they'd lose federal funds. Geez, It ain't hard.
How does one actively pursue illegals? I see where you're going with this.

 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
46,689
1,758
113
Not making anything up. This EO would compel locals to actively become immigration officers. They would have to actively pursue illegals otherwise they'd lose federal funds. Geez, It ain't hard.
It would mandate them to enforce existing laws on the books that are within the existing mandate of Law Enforcement? And, again, the mandate is to notify ICE when an illegal has committed a crime, not become ICE officers. Your logic is as flawed as I've seen.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,170
819
113
It would mandate them to enforce existing laws on the books that are within the existing mandate of Law Enforcement? And, again, the mandate is to notify ICE when an illegal has committed a crime, not become ICE officers. Your logic is as flawed as I've seen.
You think this is bad......How would you like to be one of his patients?
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,991
1,921
113
You think this is bad......How would you like to be one of his patients?

Gosh that made my tooth ache just reading that!

You want someone that mentally unstable messing around in your mouth?

No Thanks.
 

WVU82_rivals

Senior
May 29, 2001
199,095
686
0
Judge William Orrick was appointed to his current position by President Barack Obama.
--- Trump again correct... ---


At the time of the appointment, Orrick was working at the law firm Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLP. He has previously served as deputy assistant attorney general for the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Obama nominated Orrick in June 2012, but Orrick was not approved until February 2013. This was mainly a party line vote, though Republican Jeff Flake broke with his party to vote to confirm Orrick.

When Barack Obama was running for president, Judge William Orrick reportedly helped raise money for him and donated some of his own money as well.

According to Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group and think tank, Orrick donated approximately $30,000 to committees supporting Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign for president. In addition, he helped raise $200,000 in contributions for the Obama campaign.

In 2015, Judge William Orrick issued a temporary restraining order against a pro-life group that had been releasing undercover videos about Planned Parenthood.

At the time, The Center for Medical Progress had been putting out highly-edited videos that they claimed showed Planned Parenthood had been illegally selling fetal tissue. Orrick issued a restraining order, saying that he reached this decision due to concerns over the safety of the leaders of the National Abortion Federation.


“NAF would be likely to suffer irreparable injury, absent an ex parte temporary restraining order, in the form of harassment, intimidation, violence, invasion of privacy, and injury to reputation, and the requested relief is in the public interest,” Orrick said at the time,according to CNN.

The National Abortion Federation said in their restraining order request that the videos had been illegally recorded.

During his Senate confirmation process, Judge William Orrick promised to never let his political views influence the way he rules on cases.

“My varied legal background is evidence that I will treat all litigants fairly and with respect, and that I will not let my personal views interfere with the administration of justice,” he said. “… I have great respect for every type of client I have represented. I have never let my political beliefs affect my legal judgment, and believe that politics have no place in the courtroom.”

Orrick went on to say that district judges must “bind themselves tightly” to precedent.
 

moe

Sophomore
May 29, 2001
32,542
151
63
Judge William Orrick was appointed to his current position by President Barack Obama.
--- Trump again correct... ---


At the time of the appointment, Orrick was working at the law firm Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLP. He has previously served as deputy assistant attorney general for the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Obama nominated Orrick in June 2012, but Orrick was not approved until February 2013. This was mainly a party line vote, though Republican Jeff Flake broke with his party to vote to confirm Orrick.

When Barack Obama was running for president, Judge William Orrick reportedly helped raise money for him and donated some of his own money as well.

According to Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group and think tank, Orrick donated approximately $30,000 to committees supporting Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign for president. In addition, he helped raise $200,000 in contributions for the Obama campaign.

In 2015, Judge William Orrick issued a temporary restraining order against a pro-life group that had been releasing undercover videos about Planned Parenthood.

At the time, The Center for Medical Progress had been putting out highly-edited videos that they claimed showed Planned Parenthood had been illegally selling fetal tissue. Orrick issued a restraining order, saying that he reached this decision due to concerns over the safety of the leaders of the National Abortion Federation.


“NAF would be likely to suffer irreparable injury, absent an ex parte temporary restraining order, in the form of harassment, intimidation, violence, invasion of privacy, and injury to reputation, and the requested relief is in the public interest,” Orrick said at the time,according to CNN.

The National Abortion Federation said in their restraining order request that the videos had been illegally recorded.

During his Senate confirmation process, Judge William Orrick promised to never let his political views influence the way he rules on cases.

“My varied legal background is evidence that I will treat all litigants fairly and with respect, and that I will not let my personal views interfere with the administration of justice,” he said. “… I have great respect for every type of client I have represented. I have never let my political beliefs affect my legal judgment, and believe that politics have no place in the courtroom.”

Orrick went on to say that district judges must “bind themselves tightly” to precedent.
Two activists who filmed undercover videos of Planned Parenthood charged with 15 felonies
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...rged-with-15-felonies/?utm_term=.7fbcba4019f6
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
Of course it does. Trump is mandating that local authorities enforce federal immigration law. That requires additional manpower, equipment, and resources. aka money. It ain't hard
No it doesnt. You dont know what you are talking about.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,572
755
113
Not making anything up. This EO would compel locals to actively become immigration officers. They would have to actively pursue illegals otherwise they'd lose federal funds. Geez, It ain't hard.
No it wouldnt. It would save them money. Use your brain for something other than running your stupid fuking mouth.
 

atlkvb

All-Conference
Jul 9, 2004
79,991
1,921
113
Judge William Orrick was appointed to his current position by President Barack Obama.
--- Trump again correct... ---


At the time of the appointment, Orrick was working at the law firm Coblentz, Patch, Duffy & Bass LLP. He has previously served as deputy assistant attorney general for the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice.

Obama nominated Orrick in June 2012, but Orrick was not approved until February 2013. This was mainly a party line vote, though Republican Jeff Flake broke with his party to vote to confirm Orrick.

When Barack Obama was running for president, Judge William Orrick reportedly helped raise money for him and donated some of his own money as well.

According to Public Citizen, a consumer rights advocacy group and think tank, Orrick donated approximately $30,000 to committees supporting Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign for president. In addition, he helped raise $200,000 in contributions for the Obama campaign.

In 2015, Judge William Orrick issued a temporary restraining order against a pro-life group that had been releasing undercover videos about Planned Parenthood.

At the time, The Center for Medical Progress had been putting out highly-edited videos that they claimed showed Planned Parenthood had been illegally selling fetal tissue. Orrick issued a restraining order, saying that he reached this decision due to concerns over the safety of the leaders of the National Abortion Federation.


“NAF would be likely to suffer irreparable injury, absent an ex parte temporary restraining order, in the form of harassment, intimidation, violence, invasion of privacy, and injury to reputation, and the requested relief is in the public interest,” Orrick said at the time,according to CNN.

The National Abortion Federation said in their restraining order request that the videos had been illegally recorded.

During his Senate confirmation process, Judge William Orrick promised to never let his political views influence the way he rules on cases.

“My varied legal background is evidence that I will treat all litigants fairly and with respect, and that I will not let my personal views interfere with the administration of justice,” he said. “… I have great respect for every type of client I have represented. I have never let my political beliefs affect my legal judgment, and believe that politics have no place in the courtroom.”

Orrick went on to say that district judges must “bind themselves tightly” to precedent.


Can you imagine Hillary's clones to the SUPCO if she had the opportunity?

If some of you older Eeers recall the "bad trips" from the psychedelic drug culture of the 60's, that would be one you'd never wake up from.

LSD on steroids.
 

bornaneer

Senior
Jan 23, 2014
30,170
819
113
Can you imagine Hillary's clones to the SUPCO if she had the opportunity?

If some of you older Eeers recall the "bad trips" from the psychedelic drug culture of the 60's, that would be one you'd never wake up from.

LSD on steroids.
Well at least one of my old favorites Roger Daltrey from the Who calls it like it is: "Democrats threw it away by putting [Hillary Clinton] up. A dead dog would have won it against [her], look at that.”
 

PriddyBoy

Junior
May 29, 2001
17,174
282
0
getting his *** handed to him by another Federal Court regarding his sanctuary city federal federal funding ban? Then he rants about "un-elected judges". The man clearly has no understanding of the Constitution and the reason judges aren't elected. So help me Madison and Jefferson.

A Ruling about Nothing, but it does seem a Federal Judge could throw out Obamacare.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...order-activist-liberal-judge-william-h-orrick