Anyone else see that UH top WR suspended for game against State?

Todd4State

Redshirt
Mar 3, 2008
17,411
1
0
If it was Bryce Beall that's being suspended. They are going to have to ride him without a QB. He had 200+ yards vs Tulane, and he's a pretty good player.
 

BoDawg.sixpack

All-Conference
Feb 5, 2010
5,340
2,797
113
we're going to blitz all the inside gaps and mix up some corner and safety blitzes. My biggest concern is the screen passes, especially the middle screen. Houston's offensive line also has no depth. I'm expecting a win but our most critical unit of play will be our defensive line.</p>
 

windcrysmary

Redshirt
Nov 11, 2007
1,788
0
0
we would whoop that *** with or without their starting qb or their #1 WR......

they have a history of whoopin' our ***.... they know that the times they are a changin'....they are dealing with a NEW MSU!!!

17 those pieces of shat.. . they are officiially DOG MEAT.... 17 them and the horse they are about to ride in on in their own stable...
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,101
25,143
113
and the Crxxm era you don't even want to belive that we might actually be moving in the right direction for the first time in a decade. I have 4 words for you. LET IT <17>ING GO. We have better coaches than Houston does and we have better players than they do. We'll win this game.
 

jwbigcreek

Redshirt
Feb 26, 2008
1,080
0
36
than I ever had in Croom. But we've **** the bed so many times in my lifetime that I'm sort of used to it (Shira, Tyler, Bellard, Felker, Sherill, Croom). Lots of games in there where we lost or nearly lost games we should have won comfortably. Call me an optimistic pessimist.

Edited to say: I do expect us to win Saturday. But I wouldn't be shocked if we lost (just disappointed).
 

russb7591

Redshirt
Oct 3, 2010
98
0
0
Bryce Bealls not the problem... Im not worried about them rushing on us we have a better rush d than our passing d. We will take all the help we can get in that dept.
 

GloryDawg

Heisman
Mar 3, 2005
19,012
15,096
113
this is one of those years like 2007 that things go our way. Six weeks ago we had one of the toughest schedule in the country. Hell who knew GA was going to suck peckers? Who knew Houston QB was going to hit the deck for good and not play in our game? Who would think FL would be down like they are and yes I am and saying it they are beatable! Ole Miss Sucks, KY sucks in fact the only team thatleft on the schedule that we can't beat isAlabama the others are ours to take. We have gotten a lot of breaks this season, especially those fumbles in the GA game. I think the stars are a line for us to win. I was thinking five or six wins this year, hell the door is open up for seven or eight wins.
 

22yardpunt

Senior
Dec 20, 2009
1,077
769
113
every other game on our remaining schedule can be labeled as "winnable", except on 11-13 and 11-20.</p>
 

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
We've destroyed 2 awful teams in UGA and Memphis and one FCS team. We looked ok against Auburn I guess, who is undefeated and looks really good, but completely **** the bed against LSU who is undefeated but doesn't look really good. Plus while we did well against Alcorn we didn't exactly bring our A-game, playcalling different or not.

And yes we did destroy Georgia. We won by 12 and were up by 18 with less than 2 minutes to play.

We could beat Florida, but I wouldn't be the least surprised if they beat us by 4 touchdowns either. I really have no gauge as to where we are at after 5 games. We could go anywhere from 5-7 to 9-3 at this point and I wouldn't be shocked. That said, we are more than capable of beating UK, UAB, Houston, and Ole Miss to get 7 wins. I think at this point these 4 are games that we are "supposed" to win, and Dan has been pretty good at winning games we are supposed to win. I think we can, but aren't supposed beat Arkansas or Florida.