Spending, at the levels you are talking about, cannot be done by "cutting back on other programs". It is simple math. Cuts wouldn't amount to anything more than rounding error relative to the spending you, and many others, are talking about. Only one sport loses a significant amount of cash flow at Penn State, that is women's basketball, and even that doesn't move the needle. So that is simply a non-starter relative to your stated desires. Anyone with even a basic understanding and awareness of the budgets knows that. Before making such claims, you should tell us all which sports you would cut back, and by how much, and show just how much additional revenue that would generate for football. Are you going to do that?
As far as fund-raising is concerned, do you think that Sandy Barbour has intentionally not tried to raise funds over the last 8 years? Do you think she has not tried hard enough, and if she did the funds would come flowing in? I don't think so, but if you do think that, the first necessary step would be to fire Sandy Barbour. If you want to advocate for that, I'm all ears. But the folks who are responsible for that type of decision, the President and the Board of Trustees, even the Trustees who have been most ardent supporters of spending more on football, have done nothing but applaud Sandy Barbour since she got here.