The thing about local politics though, is you’re never going to have wide policy swings from a single election. Especially in a place as deplorable as Jackson. The goal shouldn’t be to elect some revolutionary candidate to basically drag the city from the ashes. Its not realistic. Even a “20 year old do-nothing” is probably over-qualified to run Jackson right now. They just need to elect some really shítty local bureaucrat, but one who is just slightly less shítty than the guy before him. And maybe when he’s done, there’s still a massive crime problem, and widespread poverty. But maybe he cuts out the corruption in the mayor’s office, and fixes some really minor problem like the zoo or something. Then he paves the way for an ever so slightly less shítty guy to follow him, and that guy gets caught up in some hookers and cocaine scandal, but also restores the utility infrastructure. And he paves the way for the next guy, and so on. Then, in like 30 years, maybe they get to the point of electing a guy who can facilitate the complexity of the UMMC / JSU dynamics, and maybe another 20 years after that, they can get someone who can put a dent in the crime problem.
That’s the path. Jackson didn’t get in its current predicament overnight, and they won’t get out of it anytime soon, either. But in order to move forward, you’ve first got to stop moving backwards. But somehow, I highly doubt that Jackson is going to do either one of those things.