Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

hotdigitydog

New member
May 21, 2007
4,729
0
0
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

win"......Neither team would open up the passing game......What do we know after this game? As the spitter said, "LSU hasthe better kicker"......I still think Bama is the better team......
 

DerHntr

Well-known member
Sep 18, 2007
15,454
1,757
113
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

there were still four interceptions.
 

Griffdawg

New member
Aug 19, 2009
757
0
0
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

Every Bama fan withina 7state area was there in T-town to support"Tha Tahhd". Going into that environment and pulling out a win was incredibly huge. What amazed me was that it looked like Bama "blinked" in overtime and LSU smelled fearon them. The LSU D cranked it up and caused Bama to move backwards in OT. They hurried AJ "Tattooed Boy" McCarron into a really stupid play on 3rd down. He should have thrown the ball away but instead he cowered down and took the sack to protect the ball.That helped push them out of FG range. As soon as Cade Foster snap-hooked the FG attempt, the air went out of the building.Only a miracle would keep LSU frommissing the short FG for the win. Game over. Tears in Tuscaloosa. I wonder what happened at their Waffle House tonight?
 

patdog

Well-known member
May 28, 2007
52,787
19,726
113
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

That was just 2 great defenses.
 

Todd4State

New member
Mar 3, 2008
17,411
1
0
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

One mistake can cost you the game. Conservative is the way to go against those two.

Alabama tried with the one "gadget" play- whatever you want to call it- and what happened? INT.
 
Apr 4, 2008
821
0
0
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

I would've put the game on Trent Richardson's shoulders more than Saban did, because he's their best player. Both McCarron and Jarrett Lee are good game managers, but are not all-star caliber QB's and neither will be in the NFL, unlike everybody on both defenses. Jordan Jefferson was the difference, his running ability gave LSU the final edge.<div>
</div><div>P.S. #30 for Alabama is illegal. 6'6", 260 lbs. with the speed of a Safety. I don't know Hightower's first name, but my guess is he goes by Mr. Hightower Sir.</div>
 

PBRME

Well-known member
Feb 12, 2004
10,330
3,468
113
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

Mutt the Hoople said:
I would've put the game on Trent Richardson's shoulders more than Saban did, because he's their best player. Both McCarron and Jarrett Lee are good game managers, but are not all-star caliber QB's and neither will be in the NFL, unlike everybody on both defenses. Jordan Jefferson was the difference, his running ability gave LSU the final edge.<div>
</div><div>P.S. #30 for Alabama is illegal. 6'6", 260 lbs. with the speed of a Safety. I don't know Hightower's first name, but my guess is he goes by Mr. Hightower Sir.</div>

 

BogeyGolfer.sixpack

New member
Aug 5, 2011
1,222
0
0
Appeared to me that both LSU and Bama were playing, "not to lose" instead of "playing to

and resulting in the int. was huge. At that point Richardson had just ripped off a 20 yard run and they seem to have LSU on their heels. They should have at least gotten 3 points out of that drive but I don't think Bama ever got inside the LSU 20 the entire game.</p>