AR15 Age Limit

bkingUK

New member
Sep 23, 2007
273,266
22,486
0
Cool. The rifle that I showed you fires .223 caliber bullets, has a 16 inch barrel, is semiautomatic, and accepts a 30 round magazine. Ever wonder what the specs of an AR15 are?
Oh you got me. You posted a rifle that didn’t look like a semi automatic but it was. You have great gun knowledge. Good w banning that one too. Sorry
 

WildcatfaninOhio

Well-known member
May 22, 2002
18,252
15,522
113
I don't know what to say to this. Under this logic, people who legally own guns should be able to take them anywhere - on planes, in bars, to sporting events, etc. The mass shooter/terrorist would of course claim that he's there to "defend himself".

If I ever find myself in a hostage situation in Uvalde TX, I’d sure hope someone with a concealed weapon could take action to try to end it. Or, we could all die while waiting for trained professionals to help us.
 

BigBlueGuru

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2007
1,533
2,423
103
Over 80% of shootings involve handguns
There you go folks. Just what I was saying. They want stop until all semi-auto weapons are banned. Take us back to the days of muzzle loading lmao.

I do thank you though bkingUK as at least you have the guts to say it instead of hide your true intentions unlike most Democrats and Liberals
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catman100
Mar 26, 2003
5,688
1,812
0
Just banning AR 15 type semi automatics isn't going to change much of anything. They will have to go much deeper than that, which I don't see happening. Most of the shootings seem to be more altercations, however if someone wanted to do a mass shooting a handgun can do that as well. Dylan Roof shot up a church and killed 9 people with a handgun. You can take a couple of revolvers with speed loaders and still cause damage.
 

502 Wildcat

Active member
Sep 11, 2007
22,310
24,112
63
I'm okay with raising the age to purchase firearms to 21, provided the age of the draft and to vote also increases to 21. I'm okay with all of that. We need to come up with a definitive age of adulthood and stick to it. Personally, in this day and age, 21 makes a lot more sense than 18.

On an unrelated note, a cannon in my front yard kinda sounds cool. I may look into that...just as people could legally do when the 2nd amendment was written.
 

502 Wildcat

Active member
Sep 11, 2007
22,310
24,112
63
Just banning AR 15 type semi automatics isn't going to change much of anything. They will have to go much deeper than that, which I don't see happening. Most of the shootings seem to be more altercations, however if someone wanted to do a mass shooting a handgun can do that as well. Dylan Roof shot up a church and killed 9 people with a handgun. You can take a couple of revolvers with speed loaders and still cause damage.

Most handguns are also semi-automatic.

1 pull of the trigger, 1 round. Banning specific guns, especially made-up categories like "assault weapons" will literally change nothing.
 

rudd1

New member
Oct 3, 2007
14,419
21,101
0
-looking specifically at school shootings: raising the age to 25 for gun purchases will *help* lower the numbers...would helped with the Dylan roof shooting/batman theater and a bunch of others.

-I'm a gun guy...I know the counter arguments. I agree that many on the left would like to ban all guns...understand the camels nose under the tent argument, folks are not wrong to think any capitulation will lead to more restrictions.

^that said. Semi-auto guns will never be banned...there will be no confiscation without an existentialy disastrous civil war. There will be no more usa if that road is taken.

-we have to address the issue...raising the age to purchase is a reasonable proposal.
 

WildcatfaninOhio

Well-known member
May 22, 2002
18,252
15,522
113
No American should own one of these. Why would anyone need this?


 

Catman100

Well-known member
Jan 3, 2003
6,683
9,612
96
Raising the age to 21 seems reasonable, but if that is the case, these same politicians should not be able to draft 18 year olds to fight some war overseas.

Make it all 21. Draft, alcohol, cigarettes', firearms, and voting.
 

jwheat

Member
Aug 21, 2005
97,626
24,206
42
The good thing about America is people like bking doesn’t get to decide what I need.

i don’t need a 100hp super snake either but I’d be damn happy driving one.

we don’t need a McDonald’s or Bk on every block

We don’t need grocery stores full of foods packed with preservatives
 

rudd1

New member
Oct 3, 2007
14,419
21,101
0
-I'd *love* to raise the voting age. An 18yo isn't the same as an 18yo 30-50 years ago.

-I'm anti draft. But no problem with kids volunteering at age 18.

-with guns I like 25 for reasons expressed earlier in the thread...many serious mental illnesses don't present until early 20's.
 

jwheat

Member
Aug 21, 2005
97,626
24,206
42
-I'd *love* to raise the voting age. An 18yo isn't the same as an 18yo 30-50 years ago.

-I'm anti draft. But no problem with kids volunteering at age 18.

-with guns I like 25 for reasons expressed earlier in the thread...many serious mental illnesses don't present until early 20's.
I’d *love* to only have people who own something (house, land, business, etc) vote. Little ***** who live with their parents, don’t pay taxes, or have any skin in the game shouldn’t get a say in how the country is ran
 

rudd1

New member
Oct 3, 2007
14,419
21,101
0
^don't disagree...but that'll never happen, it'd be couched as a poll tax. I'd settle on raising the age to 21...which will never happen, it's ok to dream.
 

bkingUK

New member
Sep 23, 2007
273,266
22,486
0
There you go folks. Just what I was saying. They want stop until all semi-auto weapons are banned. Take us back to the days of muzzle loading lmao.

I do thank you though bkingUK as at least you have the guts to say it instead of hide your true intentions unlike most Democrats and Liberals
Yea I don’t give a **** if you label something as liberal. I’m for all legislation that decreases availability of guns. The second amendment will never be abolished, but if it was possible to do that with out causing a civil war, we should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

Nightwish84

New member
Dec 11, 2020
4,970
6,265
0
"...we will not rest until we have taken weapons of war out of circulation and our communities each and every day." - Mondaire Jones, D-NY, yesterday


"OUT. OF. CIRCULATION."

"You will not stop us from advancing the Protecting Our Kids Act today," he added. "If the filibuster obstructs us, we will abolish it. If the Supreme Court objects, we will expand it. And we will not rest until we have taken weapons of war out of circulation and our communities each and every day."

Translation: F*** the Constitution!
Cool, you found the occasional Dem who wants gun bans. I can find a few R's who think Trump legit won states he didn't. Bottom line, you and I both know all Dems do is talk, same as folks on the right. Don't tell me you're scared of Biden, Chuck, and Nancy all of a sudden. Hell, abortion is probably going to be outlawed in several states as a Dem sits in the WH, and you and Guru believe they can put together waves of gun bans until you and your buddies only have skillets and spatulas to defend yourselves with. It's funny, you guys love to mock the left, but if one of them mentions anything to do with guns, your side turns to jelly and begins worrying and creating scenarios in your minds of Federal agents busting through your doors and snatching your toys.
 

BlueRaider22

New member
Sep 24, 2003
15,562
9,058
0
To lower gun deaths w/o restricting access. You have to understand first where gun deaths come from: suicides, accidents, murders, justifiable shootings. Suicides by far represent the majority of gun deaths. Most murders come from gang and inner city violence. Accidents often times are preventable, but not always.




1. I hope and pray that these mentally ill people who commit such crimes don't realize there are many other ways to be better at it. In 2016 Nice, France, a guy killed 84 and wounded 458 others by driving a truck through crowded streets. Most people have enough chemicals laying around their homes to make various bombs. What if someone poisoned a school's spaghetti? From a very warped perspective, we're lucky these jackholes are only using semi-auto guns.



2. Mental Illness - As a general statement, the US is pretty poor with dealing with mental illness. It's widely accepted that a large population of the homeless are mentally ill. Instead of helping these people we either ignore them and/or chuck drugs at them. We need better diagnostics, better recognition, better treatments. Appropriate interaction needs to happen among the general populace, firearm community, etc.



3. Technology/options - I do think that firearm companies should embrace and develop more safety tech. For example, palm/finger print identification on a firearm. Right now the technology is prone to failures.....which makes it less than ideal for life/death situations. However, if things could progress to the point where it can be reliable and prevent the possible "kid accidental discharge" scenario, it might be worth it.

And ABSOLUTELY I AM NOT mandating that all firearms should have this. I'm saying that in the future if the technology gets better/reliable, that consumers should have options.

Or what about less lethal technology that subdues the threat......for example the Star Trek "phasers on stun." Sure, we're talking about some fantastical things here, but why not? What if tasers get to the point where they have multiple shots, accurate, and extremely reliable? Once again, it'd be nice for Americans to have options.



4. Safety - It'd be nice to have significant incentives for people to take basic firearm safety or general firearm training. While certainly not aimed at the mass shooters out there, it might help lower the accidental happenings.


5. Parenting/Child Rearing - THIS IS HUGE, HUGE, HUGE. Kids are not being taught right/wrong or shown the consequences for their actions. They're not being taught good decision making. This SHOULD be the parent's responsibility.....and when the parents let their kids go off to school, the schools would aid in the rearing. Far too often, kids are getting guidance at home or at school.



6. Education - I think that every single year there should be a "LIFE" class in school. Kids should be taught how to weigh decisions, consider consequences, and act accordingly. Understanding the importance of participating in government and citizenry. Kids should be taught about various jobs out there......requirements (which includes going to college or not).....pay......etc. Kids should be taught about finances......investing/stock market, compounding interest, paying bills, college loans, what is insurance, what is a mortgage, free market economics, taxes.........understanding decisions/consequences to invest in the market vs by a Polaris Razor/bass boat. Kids should be taught some basic communication and relationship skills. Understanding why friends act like they do. Understand the differences between men and women. Understand and teach coping of bullying, etc.



7. Inner city/ghetto - Combined with all of the above, we need more police presence. We need to flood the areas of high crime. And not just police sitting in cars waiting for things to happen. We need officers to walk neighborhoods, smile, talk to people on porches, shoot basketball with kids in the park, incite community involvement, etc. Once crime starts to decrease, give incentives for businesses to start moving into the areas to stimulate economic growth.





If you do the following, gun deaths will reduce in time.....but it's not quick. And all without restricting access to law abiding citizens.



This would also address a number of other issues.
 
A

anon_ce2llurbpkli4

Guest
-bringing this back on topic:

25 yo age limit for legal purchase is a fantastic idea for mitigation of school schootings*. The human brain isn't fully developed until we're about 25. Schizophrenia and other serious mental health problems usually don't manifest until early 20's.

^I am a hunter/shooter, registered indy and lean hard right on non bedroom/weed issues.

*won't stop...but mitigate. Most of these shooters are 16-20. It's a reasonable compromise.
So, 18 year olds can serve in the military where they will use 9mm’s, M-16’s, .45 Cal handguns, 50 Cal machine guns and M-60’s yet they’re not mature enough to purchase them in the civilian world?
 

MegaBlue05

New member
Mar 8, 2014
10,041
18,841
0
Round em all up and go back to muzzleloaders.

It’ll be a ***** to hunt, but it’ll take damn near an hour to fire 60 shots.

Problem solved. You’re welcome.


Yes. I’m being facetious.
 

bkingUK

New member
Sep 23, 2007
273,266
22,486
0
There are so many shootings in the US on a daily basis that the only time a shooting gets attention is when innocent kids are murdered. The country averages 45,000 gun shootings deaths a year. The only countries with more shooting deaths are 2nd and 3rd world countries. The US is the 10th worst in the world.

The US averages 12 deaths per 100k people.
Japan averages .06
The UK averages .23

That’s not even counting the amount of crime committed using guns.
 

812scottj

Well-known member
Apr 24, 2014
1,873
3,701
113
People should stop shooting each other. Let’s make a deal: U don’t shoot me, and I won’t shoot you? Some idiot may violate that pact, and I should have the right to shoot back.
 

WildcatfaninOhio

Well-known member
May 22, 2002
18,252
15,522
113
Raising the age to 21 seems reasonable, but if that is the case, these same politicians should not be able to draft 18 year olds to fight some war overseas.

Make it all 21. Draft, alcohol, cigarettes', firearms, and voting.

Can we add driving a motor vehicle, getting married, and indoctrination into religious beliefs? I’d be all for making it all the age of 21.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hmt5000

hmt5000

New member
Aug 29, 2009
26,976
82,650
0
My pump shotgun can do a lot of damage pretty damn fast.
Sad thing is that a guy can train very little and become very deadly with a pump action shotgun. A navy seal wanted to show just how deadly a pump action would be in a school, where you don't have to worry about being over powered by large men, and it was shocking.

I don't even want to describe it and he later deleted the video because it showed how easy it was to shoot and reload and always keep a couple shells in the gun, and just have a couple bandolier over the shoulder, he was walking through a course and it was hard to watch. And if you say "yeah but he's a navy seal"... He went deliberately slow and even purposely screwed up to show that in that type of situation with young kids... they don't fight back. They are victims from the first shot.
 

BigBlueFanGA

New member
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,455
0
Sad thing is that a guy can train very little and become very deadly with a pump action shotgun. A navy seal wanted to show just how deadly a pump action would be in a school, where you don't have to worry about being over powered by large men, and it was shocking.

I don't even want to describe it and he later deleted the video because it showed how easy it was to shoot and reload and always keep a couple shells in the gun, and just have a couple bandolier over the shoulder, he was walking through a course and it was hard to watch. And if you say "yeah but he's a navy seal"... He went deliberately slow and even purposely screwed up to show that in that type of situation with young kids... they don't fight back. They are victims from the first shot.
Agreed, it would be easy and horrifying. Even worse if its sawed off, you get much more spread in a small area.
 
Jan 28, 2007
20,397
30,168
0
Nothing happened after Sandy Hook and nothing is going to happen now.

I'm all for increasing the age limit to buy guns and putting big-time restrictions on hand-guns (not necessarily AR's). But I don't really know what gun law (outside of just mass banning of guns) would have stopped Sandy Hook. That little psycho didn't own a gun. His mom did. And he stole his mom's guns, killed her, and then killed the kids.

That kid, however, should have been institutionalized long before he even considered doing that. And further, what was that dumbass mom thinking taking that kid to the gun range?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

hmt5000

New member
Aug 29, 2009
26,976
82,650
0
I'm all for increasing the age limit to buy guns and putting big-time restrictions on hand-guns (not necessarily AR's). But I don't really know what gun law (outside of just mass banning of guns) would have stopped Sandy Hook. That little psycho didn't own a gun. His mom did. And he stole his mom's guns, killed her, and then killed the kids.

That kid, however, should have been institutionalized long before he even considered doing that. And further, what was that dumbass mom thinking taking that kid to the gun range?
That kid, however, should have been institutionalized long before he even considered doing that. And further, what was that dumbass mom thinking taking that kid to the gun range?


And we don't even look into the chemicals we are pumping into these kids. 8 out of 10 at one point were on the same exact medication. They never even looked into the medication. Is the point to stop mass shootings or to restrict gun laws?
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix

bbncal02

New member
Nov 14, 2017
43,576
63,419
0
My pump shotgun can do a lot of damage pretty damn fast.
People forget how devastating shotguns can be in close range. Perfect weapon with little over penetration. Keeps stuff from going to other rooms but still good stopping power. . Perfect weapon for home defense. Nobody is getting up from a shotgun to the chest unless they are wearing heavy body armor. And even then that’s going to hurt enough to where it’s going to slow them down enough for a kill shot if need be. Nothing says “get out” like the universal language of a pump action shotgun cocking.
 

chroix

New member
Jul 22, 2013
10,018
25,203
0
So, 18 year olds can serve in the military where they will use 9mm’s, M-16’s, .45 Cal handguns, 50 Cal machine guns and M-60’s yet they’re not mature enough to purchase them in the civilian world?

They receive multiple weeks of training before they are even allowed to handle some of those weapons. Also do you think that they just walk around base carrying M60s everywhere? Are you advocating for the general public to be able to purchase heavy weaponry once they turn 18?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbncal02

Beatle Bum

Well-known member
Sep 1, 2002
39,263
57,997
113
Raising the age to 21 seems reasonable, but if that is the case, these same politicians should not be able to draft 18 year olds to fight some war overseas.

Make it all 21. Draft, alcohol, cigarettes', firearms, and voting.
No one in this country has a constitutional right to alcohol and cigarettes. Placing an age limit on those is not the same as telling a person of the age of majority they cannot buy a gun until the turn 21. The right protected from government infringement probably inures when they reach the age of majority and are emancipated from parental control.
 

chroix

New member
Jul 22, 2013
10,018
25,203
0
No one in this country has a constitutional right to alcohol and cigarettes. Placing an age limit on those is not the same as telling a person of the age of majority they cannot buy a gun until the turn 21. The right protected from government infringement probably inures when they reach the age of majority and are emancipated from parental control.

The right to run for President is in the constitution and has a different age limitation set than the age of majority so it’s not like it’s some impossible hurdle that’s never existed.
 

AustinTXCat

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2003
52,090
306,181
113
-looking specifically at school shootings: raising the age to 25 for gun purchases will *help* lower the numbers...would helped with the Dylan roof shooting/batman theater and a bunch of others.

-I'm a gun guy...I know the counter arguments. I agree that many on the left would like to ban all guns...understand the camels nose under the tent argument, folks are not wrong to think any capitulation will lead to more restrictions.

^that said. Semi-auto guns will never be banned...there will be no confiscation without an existentialy disastrous civil war. There will be no more usa if that road is taken.

-we have to address the issue...raising the age to purchase is a reasonable proposal.
Totally agree. Might additionally create a military exemption as far as 18-20 or 18-24 year-olds purchasing semi-auto weapons goes. Effectively kills the "old enough to serve, old enough to own" argument and may also assist pathetic Army recruiting figures.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chroix