This may have been discussed already, but this is a primary reason why I want Stansbury gone. For years we were known as a team that will play tough, physical defense and would always give you a 40 minute dog fight. Now, we're known as a bunch of thug, undisciplined, overrated, underachieving ******** that may punch you in the face if you start beating us. This is a direct reflection of the Head Coach and is a black eye on our University. He is lucky he wasn't fired after the Hawaii incident, and realistically Sidney should have been kicked off the team. A good coach would have pulled Arnett out of the game after that bull **** last night and sat his *** out for the rest of the game. In a matter of about 3 years, I've gone from being proud of our effort and proud of our program, to being embarrassed by both. Luckily, I just don't see Stricklin allowing this to go on one more year.
Arnett Moultrie and his trip attempt last night
- Thread starter CadaverDawg
- Start date
Moultrie's was after a ridiculous no-call. Wendell Lewis was mauled on his dunk and I think Moultrie let his emotions get the best of him.
Bost's reaction at the end of the game was worse.
And back to our fouling, what the hell was Stansbury doing letting Kentucky dribble out a possession with a minute left.
Bost's reaction at the end of the game was worse.
And back to our fouling, what the hell was Stansbury doing letting Kentucky dribble out a possession with a minute left.
Moultrie's may have been slightly more justified, but what he did was bad... Bost really barely pushed the guy. He was just intentionally getting him out of bounds. This was no different than any other foul at the end of a game, with the exception of he didn't make a play on the ball. The guy Bost pushed made it seem much worse than it was. Moultrie's could have gone much worse. If he actually would've tripped that guy, it would have been a big deal, and all over the news.
piece of **** and try tripping the guy. Hell, I would rather him try to trip the ref! He's the one that made the bad call. Not really, I'm just sick of us not only underachieving, but showing zero class and zero effort in the process. I'm sure if we were winning I wouldn't give a **** about the trip, but it sucks to underachieve AND make the program look bad in the process. Stansbury has now got everybody in the country talking about how we do less with more, we're undisciplined, we lack effort, we lack heart, etc. That's all on Stansbury
Wasn't called for, all he had to do was run into the player not push.
Not that any of this matters but I didn't understand why Stans didn't burn some timeouts to start the 2nd half. Say all you want about being tired but I don't think we got tired until the pressure mounted the last 6 minutes of the game. I also didn't understand why he went to the zone at the end of the game.
It's over, the only way I think Stans could survive is a house hold cleaning of his assistants and run off the the misfits. I just don't see him willing to do this, he is way to hard-headed and stubborn. Too bad as I think Stans has done a good job who loves the University but I just think his ego is way to big to accept change or being told to change.
Not that any of this matters but I didn't understand why Stans didn't burn some timeouts to start the 2nd half. Say all you want about being tired but I don't think we got tired until the pressure mounted the last 6 minutes of the game. I also didn't understand why he went to the zone at the end of the game.
It's over, the only way I think Stans could survive is a house hold cleaning of his assistants and run off the the misfits. I just don't see him willing to do this, he is way to hard-headed and stubborn. Too bad as I think Stans has done a good job who loves the University but I just think his ego is way to big to accept change or being told to change.
Moultrie could have VERY easily been T'd up again after his putback dunk late. he stared at the UK player and then barked something. You cannot do that crap. These are the reasons that I am most frustrated with Stansbury... Not the "we are so talented argument". I am frustrated with the fact that he won't chew some *** when he needs to.
This is why I have a problem with his kids being so involved. If my kids are around, I will definitely be aware of what I have to say. There are times when college kids need to have a quality *** chewing and he isn't doing that. Maybe its because his kids are around, maybe its not. I just believe that shouldn't be an issue. a college huddle during a game is no place for kids</p>
This is why I have a problem with his kids being so involved. If my kids are around, I will definitely be aware of what I have to say. There are times when college kids need to have a quality *** chewing and he isn't doing that. Maybe its because his kids are around, maybe its not. I just believe that shouldn't be an issue. a college huddle during a game is no place for kids</p>
...and he tends to pout or throw a fit.
Bottom line - we all want Moultrie to be Roberts and Bost to be Bowers. It ain't happening. They just don't quite have it where it counts.
Bottom line - we all want Moultrie to be Roberts and Bost to be Bowers. It ain't happening. They just don't quite have it where it counts.