Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="PaintedontheSky" data-source="post: 129262237" data-attributes="member: 1807814">Listen-up, ****-For-Brains........ let me explain this to you like the F'N idiot you've proven yourself to be.The official was not shown the replay video, as the viewers of the game were, that showed the Duke player as last to touch the ball before it went out of bounds.&nbsp; The official was shown a different video that did not reflect 'undisputable video evidence' that the Duke player was last to touch the ball.... therefore if the official had made the call without the 'undisputable video evidence' the game would have indeed been corrupted.&nbsp; Surly, after having it explained to you you'd understand that, but as evidenced, it's doubtful, not probably, and very unlikely.The official made the right call according to the rules of the game, IDIOT. <img src="http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/smokin.r191677.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="PaintedontheSky, post: 129262237, member: 1807814"] Listen-up, ****-For-Brains........ let me explain this to you like the F'N idiot you've proven yourself to be. The official was not shown the replay video, as the viewers of the game were, that showed the Duke player as last to touch the ball before it went out of bounds. The official was shown a different video that did not reflect 'undisputable video evidence' that the Duke player was last to touch the ball.... therefore if the official had made the call without the 'undisputable video evidence' the game would have indeed been corrupted. Surly, after having it explained to you you'd understand that, but as evidenced, it's doubtful, not probably, and very unlikely. The official made the right call according to the rules of the game, IDIOT. [IMG]http://l.yimg.com/j/assets/img/emoticons/classic/smokin.r191677.gif[/IMG] [/QUOTE]

Name