holding high ranking positions within their father's (or father-in-law's) regime? Or their leader enriching himself at the expense of the common folk....... Nothing can go wrong....nothing to see here. Move along.
Ask the North Korean people what they think about the families of their leaders....
- Thread starter Original Mountaineer1
- Start date
And yoy wonder why I keep telling you it is hard to take you seriously regarding Trump. Nazis out===>nkoreans in.
It's funny, we pretty much agree on politics but you hate my position on Higgins![roll][roll][roll]
That seems to be one of the great conundrums of his first 66 days. There really aren't a lot of right wing dictators. Therefore, he most compares with the little populist Austrian without all the hatred. But the left-wingers seem to embed the family into the regime. That is why I went with North Korea.... You could throw in the Castro's too.
Last edited:
You are really delusional. He would compare to a king with his family members profitting.
I am sure you and the rest of the nutz would approve of that arrangement. Would keep the libs at bay....
Wouldn't my disapproval of the blatant nepotism and self-dealing be evidence of a core value.....while your acceptance of this nonsense shows you are spineless, lacking critical thinking skills, and pretty much a Trump lackey. Think about it for a minute if you can.
This is where someone is obligated to mention Kennedys, then you say Bushes so someone says Rockefellers. Let's just say Adamses and call it a day for nepotism. No disrespect intended for Teddy Roosevelt and FDR and his cousin bride.
This is where someone is obligated to mention Kennedys, then you say Bushes so someone says Rockefellers. Let's just say Adamses and call it a day for nepotism. No disrespect intended for Teddy Roosevelt and FDR and his cousin bride.
Okay the was obviously voting when the two Bushes were elected. The others wat before my time. But I don't recall George I or George II employing family in the WH or on their staff. I surely can't recall either enriching themselves through self-dealing either. So what is your point?
You don't remember the non-stop "outrage" over Dubya? Halliburton and the like? Seriously?
Or do we just stick with George Bush's weather machine and intentionally leaving black people in N'wlins to die? Or the inside job on the WTC, "loose change", anyone?
GTFOH