Attempting to decieve the defense penalty

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
Tommy West has run that play multiple times at Memphis. He ran it against us in the opener this year as well. The QB is the only player in motion. There is nothing illegal about that.
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

All-Conference
May 28, 2007
17,941
3,893
113
Rule 9-2-2-VII

Team A is lined up in scrimmage kick formation and has been set
for one second. One of the offensive backs shouts to and motions to
A40, the blocker on the right wing, to get off the field. At the snap,
A40 is in legal motion toward his sideline. A40 turns downfield and
becomes a pass receiver. RULING: Penalty-15 yards from the
previous spot. This is a tactic associated with the substitution process
to deceive opponents.
Problem is it wasn't a kick formation nor was it attempting to look like a substitution. It was entirely legal. If the RB told the QB to get off the field, then it should be deception. Otherwise it was a really bad penalty.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
He was going away from the line of scrimmage which is completely legal. There is no rule that you can't throw your hands up and act like the play is messed up while you're in motion.

As I said, Memphis has used this exact play multiple times without getting called for a penalty. Deceiving the defense is part of the game.

I guess we should've gotten a penalty on our halfback pass against LSU because it's not fair to the defense to fake like you're going to run and then throw a pass.
 

futaba.79

Redshirt
Jun 4, 2007
2,296
0
0
(lifted from a BYU message board)

"An obviously unfair act not specifically covered by the rules occurs
during the game (A.R. 4-2-1-II)."

The QB must have said something while gesturing. It was an act designed to deceive and it pissed the ref off.
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

All-Conference
May 28, 2007
17,941
3,893
113
It's risky, but I've never understood why you never see a center shotgun snap to a runningback while the QB is under center, unless this is against a rule. Does anybody know this?