Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Message Boards
Rivals300
Recruiting Board
NIL Valuation
Transfer Portal
Andy & Ari On3
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Why saying James Franklin 'can't win the big one' could play into Penn State's favor this year
2025 Hot Seat: College football coaches feeling the most pressure this season
The latest D.J. Lagway injury isn't the problem, it’s the amount he’s had
Brent Venables gives pros, cons of Ben Arbuckle having so much responsibility despite age
Pat Kelsey raves about Mikel Brown performance with Team USA
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
B12 expansion & the Mountain Eers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="topdecktiger" data-source="post: 129305434" data-attributes="member: 1459051"><p>I didn't imply the ACC is in "tall cotton." What I'm telling you is, the discrepancy in the payouts now is what you can expect in the future. You can believe what you want to believe, but the projections you are quoting are not accurate.</p><p></p><p>Give me a breakdown of <em>where</em> that money is coming from. The only contract still left to renegotiate is the Big Ten's ESPN deal. Aside from that everything is locked in. If you are going to say it's from the conference networks, then you are going to have to show me where that money will come from. For example, the SEC made about $5.5 million from the network this year. They currently have 87 million subscribers. The number of households in the SEC footprint is 34 million. They only get the $1.30 subscription rate for in-footprint subscribers. (Outside the footprint, the rate is 25 cents.) They have mostly maxed out the in-footprint subscribers. They only way you can account for that much of an increase is if you include the other income, like CFP, bowls, etc.</p><p></p><p>Let me specifically deal with the link you posted. This author says the problem with the ACC is that it signed its Tier 3 TV rights to ESPN. Well, do you realize that everyone else had done that as well? The SEC had to sign all of its Tier 3 rights to ESPN for the SECN. The Big Ten had to sign all of its Tier 3 rights to Fox for the BTN. The Pac 12 had to sign all of its Tier 3 rights to its network. The only conference that has Tier 3 rights left is the Big 12.</p><p></p><p>Now, let me make a clarification about this. The rights that have been signed over are the Tier 3 <strong><u>TV</u></strong> rights. All these schools still have their multimedia Tier 3 rights (like radio). The point being, the ACC has the same Tier 3 rights situation as all the other leagues, aside from the Big 12. So, if an ACC team jumped to the SEC or Big Ten, for example, they wouldn't be able to sign this huge Tier 3 contract with IMG, for example, because they wouldn't have any extra rights than they did before.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="topdecktiger, post: 129305434, member: 1459051"] I didn't imply the ACC is in "tall cotton." What I'm telling you is, the discrepancy in the payouts now is what you can expect in the future. You can believe what you want to believe, but the projections you are quoting are not accurate. Give me a breakdown of [I]where[/I] that money is coming from. The only contract still left to renegotiate is the Big Ten's ESPN deal. Aside from that everything is locked in. If you are going to say it's from the conference networks, then you are going to have to show me where that money will come from. For example, the SEC made about $5.5 million from the network this year. They currently have 87 million subscribers. The number of households in the SEC footprint is 34 million. They only get the $1.30 subscription rate for in-footprint subscribers. (Outside the footprint, the rate is 25 cents.) They have mostly maxed out the in-footprint subscribers. They only way you can account for that much of an increase is if you include the other income, like CFP, bowls, etc. Let me specifically deal with the link you posted. This author says the problem with the ACC is that it signed its Tier 3 TV rights to ESPN. Well, do you realize that everyone else had done that as well? The SEC had to sign all of its Tier 3 rights to ESPN for the SECN. The Big Ten had to sign all of its Tier 3 rights to Fox for the BTN. The Pac 12 had to sign all of its Tier 3 rights to its network. The only conference that has Tier 3 rights left is the Big 12. Now, let me make a clarification about this. The rights that have been signed over are the Tier 3 [B][U]TV[/U][/B] rights. All these schools still have their multimedia Tier 3 rights (like radio). The point being, the ACC has the same Tier 3 rights situation as all the other leagues, aside from the Big 12. So, if an ACC team jumped to the SEC or Big Ten, for example, they wouldn't be able to sign this huge Tier 3 contract with IMG, for example, because they wouldn't have any extra rights than they did before. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
B12 expansion & the Mountain Eers
Top
Bottom