What? Bardo is usually one of our cheerleaders, so I disagree. Yes, he hasn't been on board this much as he has in the past, but he still really likes our team.Joke
So? I've never understood complaining about announcers.
They have zero effect on the game. Who cares? I normally don't even listen to the announcers.
Bardo kept saying Edey didn't foul Paul.
Refs still called a T.
Announcers have zero effect on the game, but can have a big effect on fan enjoyment of a game.
What I'd really like is an option to just mute the commentary entirely and just watch the game with an on-court microphone - like you were actually attending the game.
Perhaps.
If Bardo was 100% homer for this game - its not improving my enjoyment.
Thanks for making everyone's point.Bardo kept saying Edey didn't foul Paul.
Refs still called a T.
Thanks for making everyone's point.
We agree on a lot of stuff (believe it or not), but totally disagree here. I'd take 24 straight hours of Beth Mowins over the *** clownery of Bardo today, particularly, his saying close to 10X that there was nothing there on the Edey technical. I rarely scream at broadcasters, but I yelled STFU multiple times today at the TV.So? I've never understood complaining about announcers.
They have zero effect on the game. Who cares? I normally don't even listen to the announcers.
Bardo kept saying Edey didn't foul Paul.
Refs still called a T.
To the Purdue coaches and fans?He’s very complementary imo
I edited it out because nobody is saying that. They're discussing his skills, comments, and apparently one sided approach to this particular game and how he saw nothing Edy was doing was wrong yet the refs disagreed. As you pointed out with that comment.. hence the highlight of it.And you edited out my point that you clearly missed.
It's very amusing how people get so upset and outraged over something that literally has zero impact on the game.
Bardo could have sat there for 2 hours saying "Rutgers is great and going to win this game" or "Rutgers sucks and going to lose" over and over. He could have said "Edey commited 45 fouls this game and should have been kicked out in the 1st half". Zero impact.
Doesn't change the final score.
He played for PurdueUsually good but today was odd. He was very pro Purdue for some reason. Even my wife said so and she never complains about the refs or announcers. At one time she told screamed shut up to him lol!!
A rival of Purdue but sure close enoughClose enough. In an "I" state.
![]()
Dear Lord....he was part of the infamous "Flyin' Illini" Final 4 squad with Kenny Battle, Nick "Cadillac" Anderson, Kendall Gill and Marcus Liberty.He played for Purdue
He swallowed so much today, I'm collecting mouthwash so he can rinse the bad taste out.Huh??? Do you think he should be a complete RU homer? He was praising RU for much of the second half
1000% this. He was unlistenable.I wonder if announcers go back and listen to themselves. I mean literally every foul call on Rutgers “good call ref” every call on Purdue “wow Rutgers caught a break there” every blatant push by RU “refs missed on there” every push on Purdue “Rutgers is complaining yes but you have to play through it”
Totally ridiculous as I’ve ever heard it and we’ve had a lot of bad announcers.
Right up there with Matt Mille
And you edited out my point that you clearly missed.
It's very amusing how people get so upset and outraged over something that literally has zero impact on the game.
Bardo could have sat there for 2 hours saying "Rutgers is great and going to win this game" or "Rutgers sucks and going to lose" over and over. He could have said "Edey commited 45 fouls this game and should have been kicked out in the 1st half". Zero impact.
Doesn't change the final score.