Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Wasserman's College Football Top 10 Ranking: Who's No. 1 and where does FSU rank?
On3:
Redemption Realized: Mike Norvell, Thomas Castellanos shock Alabama, rewrite Florida State narratives
On3:
Kalen DeBoer keeps losing games that Nick Saban wouldn't have lost at Alabama
On3:
Is it time to push the Arch Manning panic button or is overreaction the danger of Week 1?
On3:
Is it time to join the Auburn hype train after Tigers roughed up Baylor in Waco?
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Big 12 digital network a move to get ahead in a changing landscape?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 130995001" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>When / if everyone else has to pay to get their own games, then it makes sense.</p><p></p><p>Now, you have just added an acc network for one of the least watched conferences. In large part, if they want to see these games its been added to the platform they already pay more for.</p><p></p><p>Now BIG 12 fans are paying for those-- btn, acc, secn, in rare cases pac nets if they have a cable or streaming subscription.</p><p></p><p>But those conferences fans are not likely going to buy BIG 12 NOW on the espn+ app, and BIG 12 fans are being asked to pay double to get their own games plus a streaming/ cable service with everyone elses games on.</p><p></p><p>Plus Texas and OU are not committed to it the same as everyone else, but are also going to take money out of it from reports.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 130995001, member: 1428007"] When / if everyone else has to pay to get their own games, then it makes sense. Now, you have just added an acc network for one of the least watched conferences. In large part, if they want to see these games its been added to the platform they already pay more for. Now BIG 12 fans are paying for those-- btn, acc, secn, in rare cases pac nets if they have a cable or streaming subscription. But those conferences fans are not likely going to buy BIG 12 NOW on the espn+ app, and BIG 12 fans are being asked to pay double to get their own games plus a streaming/ cable service with everyone elses games on. Plus Texas and OU are not committed to it the same as everyone else, but are also going to take money out of it from reports. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Big 12 digital network a move to get ahead in a changing landscape?
Top
Bottom