Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
Tennessee RB DeSean Bishop bet on himself and now faces tough test against Georgia
On3:
True Freshman Standouts from Week 2 of College Football
On3:
Unfiltered Takes after Week 2: John Mateer, Billy Napier, Oregon & much more
On3:
College Football Bowl Projections Week 3: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions
On3:
On3 Heisman Trophy Poll: Top 10 player rankings after Week 2
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Big 12 is Doomed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 129608143" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>How does Texas "limit liability"? If they leave after the current contracts--which is the only time they'd be able to leave due to grants of rights agreements they have NO liability.</p><p></p><p>Therefore it is asinine to suggest that they desire expansion now to reduce liability later.</p><p></p><p>Obviously Texas is for expansion because they have chosen to continue to strengthen the BIG 12 and NOT go anywhere else. Adding schools now has no effect on Texas leaving later if they chose to after 2025. However since the conference is going to expand, its going to be meeting with its tv partners to have changes made to its contracts--and the tv partners are likely going to want to lock down the conference long term at that point. This means a longer tv contract AND a renewed and lengthened grant of rights.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 129608143, member: 1428007"] How does Texas "limit liability"? If they leave after the current contracts--which is the only time they'd be able to leave due to grants of rights agreements they have NO liability. Therefore it is asinine to suggest that they desire expansion now to reduce liability later. Obviously Texas is for expansion because they have chosen to continue to strengthen the BIG 12 and NOT go anywhere else. Adding schools now has no effect on Texas leaving later if they chose to after 2025. However since the conference is going to expand, its going to be meeting with its tv partners to have changes made to its contracts--and the tv partners are likely going to want to lock down the conference long term at that point. This means a longer tv contract AND a renewed and lengthened grant of rights. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Big 12 is Doomed
Top
Bottom