Big Ten Expansion

What combination of teams would you like in the B1G?


  • Total voters
    0

LooseCannon

Heisman
Jan 8, 2008
154,717
18,649
113
With television contracts expiring this spring. Could the B1G make a move to lock up some teams and tv markets? Who do you want in the B1G if they expand? I want Kansas and Oklahoma no doubt. Add Notre Dame and UVA, that would just be icing on the cake.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trentonfan
Sep 29, 2001
1,424
442
0
Notre Dame is appealing, but they aren't coming so scratch them off the list.

We already add two stiffs in football, I can't imagine us going for anyone other than OU. Kansas or another team will just come along for the ride. I know their academics aren't all that great, but probably aren't THAT much below Nebraska's. I am in the minority but I would like Texas to come as well....I don't think the B1G would kowtow to those guys like everyone else has....which is the reason I don't think they ever get an offer.
 

rez dog 70

Heisman
Sep 11, 2011
156,594
36,858
113
Notre Dame is appealing, but they aren't coming so scratch them off the list.

We already add two stiffs in football, I can't imagine us going for anyone other than OU. Kansas or another team will just come along for the ride. I know their academics aren't all that great, but probably aren't THAT much below Nebraska's. I am in the minority but I would like Texas to come as well....I don't think the B1G would kowtow to those guys like everyone else has....which is the reason I don't think they ever get an offer.

Please not the horns.
 

LooseCannon

Heisman
Jan 8, 2008
154,717
18,649
113
Notre Dame is appealing, but they aren't coming so scratch them off the list.

We already add two stiffs in football, I can't imagine us going for anyone other than OU. Kansas or another team will just come along for the ride. I know their academics aren't all that great, but probably aren't THAT much below Nebraska's. I am in the minority but I would like Texas to come as well....I don't think the B1G would kowtow to those guys like everyone else has....which is the reason I don't think they ever get an offer.
KU has better academics than Nebraska. Plus AAU membership and tons of research potential as well.

I really think Notre Dame is going to have to join a conference. Whether it's the Big 10 or ACC, they will be left out if they stay Independent.
 

LooseCannon

Heisman
Jan 8, 2008
154,717
18,649
113
Also the B1G needs to stay away from UT. We know what they can bring to the table money wise and eyeball wise, but the trouble is not worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414
Sep 29, 2001
1,424
442
0
KU has better academics than Nebraska. Plus AAU membership and tons of research potential as well.

I really think Notre Dame is going to have to join a conference. Whether it's the Big 10 or ACC, they will be left out if they stay Independent.

I meant the academics at Oklahoma are below Nebraska's but not by a huge amount...no AAU at OU either....
 
  • Like
Reactions: LooseCannon

maplesyrup95

All-Conference
Nov 26, 2014
1,675
1,064
0
It still really confuses me why they let Rutgers and Maryland into the B1G. But as long as we have 14 teams now, it makes that much more sense to have 16 teams. Keep in mind this is just football.

They could split it into two groups of 8 teams :

B1G West --- (1)Nebraska (2)Oklahoma (3)Wisconsin (4)Illinois (5)Northwestern
(6)Kansas (7)Minnesota (8)Iowa

B1G East
--- (1)Michigan State (2)OSU (3)Michigan (4)Indiana (5)Penn State (6)Maryland (7)Rutgers (8)Purdue


OR 4 groups of 4 team in the age of the Playoff System. Win 2 out of 3 in your group and play the winner of one of the other 4 group winner for the semifinals, then play the final 2. Just brainstorming here. Have no idea if this would work:

B1G West
--- (1)Nebraska (2)Oklahoma (3)Kansas (4)Iowa

B1G North --- (1)Michigan State (2)Michigan (3)Illinois (4)Minnesota

B1G Central --- (1)Wisconsin (2)Northwestern (3)Purdue (4)Indiana

B1G East --- (1)OSU (2)Penn State (3)Maryland (4)Rutgers
 

jimbosc

Senior
Jul 27, 2001
4,473
761
0
Only 2 - and OU and KU would be awesome fits relative to Nebraska. Maybe not what the rest of the B1G wants. The conference seems to be focused on eastern expansion not the south or west. Most likely candidates are VA and UNC - but they seem pretty solid on remaining in the ACC. I think the hurdle to get Notre Dame or any Big 12 school into the B1G is much lower in terms of paying off penalties. Texas won't join a conference with a Fox affiliated network (BTN) as long as the Longhorn Network remains in existence with ESPN.
 

Maui2022

All-Conference
Jan 2, 2005
2,452
1,406
3
Also the B1G needs to stay away from UT. We know what they can bring to the table money wise and eyeball wise, but the trouble is not worth it.
Texas ruined 3 conferences ... the SWC, Big 8 and Big 12. They should go independent and that would then free up Oklahoma. Oklahoma is a better fit for the SEC. Kansas for the Big 10.

I do see more movement and consolidation with the Big 12 taking most of the hits, deservingly so ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: LooseCannon

candid

Sophomore
Sep 5, 2004
87,316
115
0
Notre Dame is appealing, but they aren't coming so scratch them off the list.

We already add two stiffs in football, I can't imagine us going for anyone other than OU. Kansas or another team will just come along for the ride. I know their academics aren't all that great, but probably aren't THAT much below Nebraska's. I am in the minority but I would like Texas to come as well....I don't think the B1G would kowtow to those guys like everyone else has....which is the reason I don't think they ever get an offer.
Careful to talk academs but, I've been told, corrected, that OU has lousy academics, Kansas is pretty good. For athletics and Ne, it would be great to add OU. Until Ne, I didn't realize the value the CIC brings in $ and Ne was really close on academs, the football program was enough. I expect Ne academs will climb and no longer a valid issue.
 

HuskerWingman

Freshman
Jun 20, 2006
336
64
0
Do you think that Kansas or Oklahoma can leave the little state schools behind. I've always heard that the states would make them a package deal and that they don't want to split them up. Personally, I don't want to include ksu in anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saltsdogg1

Hoosker Du

All-American
Dec 11, 2001
44,018
5,171
0
KU has better academics than Nebraska. Plus AAU membership and tons of research potential as well.

I really think Notre Dame is going to have to join a conference. Whether it's the Big 10 or ACC, they will be left out if they stay Independent.

KU is generally about equal or below Nebraska in the academic rankings that I've seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Husker69 and HeyDoc

MITCH492

Junior
Dec 23, 2004
472
210
0
Kansas and UVA are the best choices as not to be a homer.

Oklahoma stirs interest, but it's not happening.
 
Feb 17, 2008
1,938
410
0
I can't imagine us going for anyone other than OU. Kansas or another team will just come along for the ride. I know their academics aren't all that great, but probably aren't THAT much below Nebraska's..

Here in no particular order are average grade point average (weighted) and average ACT scores for freshmen admissions to Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Rutgers. All pretty similar except the middle one stands out a bit, anyone want to take a guess which one it is?
3.72; 28
3.82; 27
3.96; 29
3.68; 27
3.77; 27
 
  • Like
Reactions: GretnaShawn

LooseCannon

Heisman
Jan 8, 2008
154,717
18,649
113
KU is generally about equal or below Nebraska in the academic rankings that I've seen.
I haven't looked at rankings for a year or so, but in the past few years KU has been in front of Nebraska. Not by much though. Being in the B1G will help Nebraska academics down the road.
 

LooseCannon

Heisman
Jan 8, 2008
154,717
18,649
113
Do you think that Kansas or Oklahoma can leave the little state schools behind. I've always heard that the states would make them a package deal and that they don't want to split them up. Personally, I don't want to include ksu in anything.
KU Chancellor said back in 2011 when the Big 12 nearly died for a second time that they aren't attached to KSUx. They will do what's best for KU.

According to the Chicago Sun, The B1G had interest in KU back in 1993 when they added Penn State, but stuck at 11 teams. Can't find the article but it was from 1994.
 

MITCH492

Junior
Dec 23, 2004
472
210
0
Here in no particular order are average grade point average (weighted) and average ACT scores for freshmen admissions to Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Rutgers. All pretty similar except the middle one stands out a bit, anyone want to take a guess which one it is?
3.72; 28
3.82; 27
3.96; 29
3.68; 27
3.77; 27
What? No way is Iowa ranked behind Nebraska. Iowa demands a recount. Trump commands it.
 

vighawk

Heisman
Jun 22, 2001
229,342
25,006
113
KU Chancellor said back in 2011 when the Big 12 nearly died for a second time that they aren't attached to KSUx. They will do what's best for KU.

According to the Chicago Sun, The B1G had interest in KU back in 1993 when they added Penn State, but stuck at 11 teams. Can't find the article but it was from 1994.

The KU Chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little chimed in on this. There is a "preference" to stay together (political correct response) but KU and KSU are not tied together.

Let's make it happen boys! KU and NU belong in the same.league (OU too). :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: LooseCannon

jedimasterjed

All-Conference
Feb 14, 2013
5,611
3,881
113
Kansas, Oklahoma or Texas would be great additions. Texas would not run the BIG the way they did the big 12.
 

SilentCommit

Senior
Jun 19, 2013
1,145
716
0
Kansas, Oklahoma or Texas would be great additions. Texas would not run the BIG the way they did the big 12.

Texas would be an awful fit with the culture of the B1G, and it seems unlikely they'd seriously consider an offer. They're the institutional equivalent of a trophy wife. As for expansion, I'm weary of it. Break the football programs away from the scholarship model, hire a commissioner, and create a large league with multiple divisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huskerfan1414

planored

All-Conference
Aug 5, 2003
14,113
2,168
0
Here in no particular order are average grade point average (weighted) and average ACT scores for freshmen admissions to Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Rutgers. All pretty similar except the middle one stands out a bit, anyone want to take a guess which one it is?
3.72; 28
3.82; 27
3.96; 29
3.68; 27
3.77; 27
Pretty sure the 29 ACT is OU
 

meo1960

Senior
Jan 15, 2003
19,821
737
113
With television contracts expiring this spring. Could the B1G make a move to lock up some teams and tv markets? Who do you want in the B1G if they expand? I want Kansas and Oklahoma no doubt. Add Notre Dame and UVA, that would just be icing on the cake.
Screw Notre Dame. Self-Entitled Jerks. They think they can just place any of their sports teams into any conference they choose??? Makes me sick! They should be on an even playing surface with the rest of Division 1.
 

Hoosker Du

All-American
Dec 11, 2001
44,018
5,171
0
I haven't looked at rankings for a year or so, but in the past few years KU has been in front of Nebraska. Not by much though. Being in the B1G will help Nebraska academics down the road.

In the 2016 US News and World Report rankings, Nebraska was 103rd and KU was 115th. I would be very surprised if KU were ranked ahead of NU the last couple of years with NU having that much of a lead this year, but I suppose it's possible.
 

Nebraska Fan

Senior
Sep 1, 2004
5,612
456
0
If they would consider UT for the television why not take Miami. Fans can fly into Miami much easier then Austin .
 
Sep 23, 2005
18,868
3,619
0
KU and Oklahoma obviously.

UNL and KU each have their strengths and weaknesses, but overall they are roughly the same academically.

It would be nice if Zenger ever got off his butt and did something with KU's stadium. It is a bit of a joke.

KS legislature keeps cutting KU's funding while adding more and more oversight. Maybe KU will go private by the time the GOR gets close to expiring.
 

inWV

All-Conference
Sep 22, 2007
13,692
4,085
91
ND is already affiliated with the ACC in some sports. I would think ACC for them if they join one.
 

Hammer of the Gods

All-Conference
Jun 30, 2004
62,553
4,383
113
It still really confuses me why they let Rutgers and Maryland into the B1G. But as long as we have 14 teams now, it makes that much more sense to have 16 teams. Keep in mind this is just football.

They could split it into two groups of 8 teams :

B1G West --- (1)Nebraska (2)Oklahoma (3)Wisconsin (4)Illinois (5)Northwestern
(6)Kansas (7)Minnesota (8)Iowa

B1G East
--- (1)Michigan State (2)OSU (3)Michigan (4)Indiana (5)Penn State (6)Maryland (7)Rutgers (8)Purdue


OR 4 groups of 4 team in the age of the Playoff System. Win 2 out of 3 in your group and play the winner of one of the other 4 group winner for the semifinals, then play the final 2. Just brainstorming here. Have no idea if this would work:

B1G West
--- (1)Nebraska (2)Oklahoma (3)Kansas (4)Iowa

B1G North --- (1)Michigan State (2)Michigan (3)Illinois (4)Minnesota

B1G Central --- (1)Wisconsin (2)Northwestern (3)Purdue (4)Indiana

B1G East --- (1)OSU (2)Penn State (3)Maryland (4)Rutgers
The Big central is way to weak.
 

NikkiSixx_rivals269993

All-Conference
Sep 14, 2013
9,783
2,444
0
One can't seriously leave Texas off the poll.. if Delaney goes after anyone, it's UT first.

He doesn't care that that NU fans are still butt hurt over the 1 sec deal. UT brings the most eyeballs, TV sets, and leverage when negotiating contracts.

If they could bring UT, then they might also add KU.

While I would like to see OU, academically, that probably isn't going to happen.

So UT & KU, if they can get UT first, otherwise, I don't see any additional expansion for now.

It would have to make a lot of financial sense to pay out more huge penalties for teams to leave their current league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LonghornInOmaha

redwine65

All-Conference
Jun 23, 2010
9,907
1,344
113
I wonder if just getting teams for cable markets is a good idea anymore, because I think people are getting away from cable markets, with hulu and things like that?
but I guess it's good to have teams by large populations regardless, for recruiting and exposure.
 
Jan 22, 2016
470
270
0
One can't seriously leave Texas off the poll.. if Delaney goes after anyone, it's UT first.

He doesn't care that that NU fans are still butt hurt over the 1 sec deal. UT brings the most eyeballs, TV sets, and leverage when negotiating contracts.

If they could bring UT, then they might also add KU.

While I would like to see OU, academically, that probably isn't going to happen.

So UT & KU, if they can get UT first, otherwise, I don't see any additional expansion for now.

It would have to make a lot of financial sense to pay out more huge penalties for teams to leave their current league.

No kidding. People have to get over the Texas thing. Crap that Texas pulls is what would make them a great rival. Open Texas a bit more to our recruiters and we could be in pretty good shape.
 

candid

Sophomore
Sep 5, 2004
87,316
115
0
The Big central is way to weak.
Rutgers and Kansas, prob about equal in ath. Rutgers was, and the RU fans know it, was added for the number of tvs. Maryland to break into the Atllantic states. Understand Ne wanting Ok and Kan but would bet on another push into the ACC for pop reasons.
 
Sep 23, 2005
18,868
3,619
0
Exactly who in the ACC could the BiG TeN get at this point? There was a time when they were vulnerable, but they are pretty strong these days. Big 12 is the obvious target.
 

GBR_Atlanta

Junior
Mar 9, 2015
1,011
311
0
Choosing from the options above, I'd have to pick KU and Notre Dame. I just can't imagine that OU has a huge desire to play here. Football is where it's at, and the ACC and SEC would take Oklahoma with open arms. I'd hope this would shift the divisions a bit as well. I'd love to see another big name in the West.
 
Sep 29, 2001
75,439
12,977
0
It still really confuses me why they let Rutgers and Maryland into the B1G. But as long as we have 14 teams now, it makes that much more sense to have 16 teams. Keep in mind this is just football.

They could split it into two groups of 8 teams :

B1G West --- (1)Nebraska (2)Oklahoma (3)Wisconsin (4)Illinois (5)Northwestern
(6)Kansas (7)Minnesota (8)Iowa

B1G East
--- (1)Michigan State (2)OSU (3)Michigan (4)Indiana (5)Penn State (6)Maryland (7)Rutgers (8)Purdue


OR 4 groups of 4 team in the age of the Playoff System. Win 2 out of 3 in your group and play the winner of one of the other 4 group winner for the semifinals, then play the final 2. Just brainstorming here. Have no idea if this would work:

B1G West
--- (1)Nebraska (2)Oklahoma (3)Kansas (4)Iowa

B1G North --- (1)Michigan State (2)Michigan (3)Illinois (4)Minnesota

B1G Central --- (1)Wisconsin (2)Northwestern (3)Purdue (4)Indiana

B1G East --- (1)OSU (2)Penn State (3)Maryland (4)Rutgers
Why are you confused about Rutgers and Maryland? Accept it or not, agree with or not BUT it was always about NYC and Washington D.C./Baltimore TV markets. It's never been much of a mystery.