Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Log in
Register
Message Boards
Rivals300
Recruiting Board
NIL Valuation
Transfer Portal
Andy & Ari On3
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
Why saying James Franklin 'can't win the big one' could play into Penn State's favor this year
2025 Hot Seat: College football coaches feeling the most pressure this season
The latest D.J. Lagway injury isn't the problem, it’s the amount he’s had
South Carolina's Nyck Harbor donates $10K in NIL earnings to high school program
Deontae Lawson injury update: Kalen DeBoer updates recovery timeline on Alabama LB
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Big Ten, Pac-12, ACC in discussions about forming alliance: Sources
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fedman" data-source="post: 131752219" data-attributes="member: 1063664"><p>I agree. A scheduling agreement between the Big10, ACC and PAC 12 would mean squat to the SEC. You can also bet the mortgage money that there will be no pooling of television revenue between the 3 conferences - the Big10 is not going to share their monster pie with the ACC and PAC 12.</p><p></p><p>The key is that by having the Big10, ACC and PAC 12 voting as a 41 vote block, they will be able to block the SEC and control all the issues involving big time football going forward.</p><p></p><p>If the proposed 12-team playoff gives more power to the SEC, then the alliance can vote the proposal down or put in a rule that no more than 3 schools from any one conference can be given spots in the playoff.</p><p></p><p>I would think the Big10, ACC and PAC 12 voting as a block would be very worrisome to the SEC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fedman, post: 131752219, member: 1063664"] I agree. A scheduling agreement between the Big10, ACC and PAC 12 would mean squat to the SEC. You can also bet the mortgage money that there will be no pooling of television revenue between the 3 conferences - the Big10 is not going to share their monster pie with the ACC and PAC 12. The key is that by having the Big10, ACC and PAC 12 voting as a 41 vote block, they will be able to block the SEC and control all the issues involving big time football going forward. If the proposed 12-team playoff gives more power to the SEC, then the alliance can vote the proposal down or put in a rule that no more than 3 schools from any one conference can be given spots in the playoff. I would think the Big10, ACC and PAC 12 voting as a block would be very worrisome to the SEC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Big Ten, Pac-12, ACC in discussions about forming alliance: Sources
Top
Bottom