Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HurdyGurdyEer" data-source="post: 129297589" data-attributes="member: 1746848">Good grief.His whole point, mistaken as it it is, is that WVU was one of the biggest losers in the conference realignment game. And when he points to the things lost he points to things pertaining to our membership in the Big East.So&nbsp; .... while he did not directly say we should have stayed in the Big East he clearly uses selective data to compare our circumstances in the Big 12 versus those in the BE and then he declares us to be a big loser because we are in B12 circumstances rather than BE circumstances. Because, according to him, we are in the B12 and we lost the perceived positives of the BE he points out, we are losers.Every loss he points to is related to a Big East conference that no longer exists. If we had stayed in the AAC do you think Syracuse and Pitt wouldn't have jumped to the ACC? I don't. And I don't think we would still be playing Pitt even in we had stayed.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HurdyGurdyEer, post: 129297589, member: 1746848"] Good grief. His whole point, mistaken as it it is, is that WVU was one of the biggest losers in the conference realignment game. And when he points to the things lost he points to things pertaining to our membership in the Big East. So .... while he did not directly say we should have stayed in the Big East he clearly uses selective data to compare our circumstances in the Big 12 versus those in the BE and then he declares us to be a big loser because we are in B12 circumstances rather than BE circumstances. Because, according to him, we are in the B12 and we lost the perceived positives of the BE he points out, we are losers. Every loss he points to is related to a Big East conference that no longer exists. If we had stayed in the AAC do you think Syracuse and Pitt wouldn't have jumped to the ACC? I don't. And I don't think we would still be playing Pitt even in we had stayed. [/QUOTE]

Name