My favorite part:
Prescott is one of 19 Bulldogs on NFL rosters, 11 of which will be active Sunday during the opening weekend. Eight former MSU players are listed as starters on depth charts in Week 1, including Pro Bowler Fletcher Cox. All 19 of them played for Dan Mullen during their MSU careers.
Don't be dumb. From the other thread:Good thing we didn't just focus on our backyard 6 years ago and took some kid out of Houghton, LA.
Incorrect again. High per capita amount of talent in LA, MS and AL. Very high.
Other schools recruit far away because they have to. Not because they want to.
Even Mullen continuously talks about the 5 hour radius. Try harder.Our recruiting foot print is what it is. We need to get our share of MS talent, be a solid #3 option in Alabama, and a solid #2 in Louisiana. Then we need to hit our JUCOs as hard as possible, maybe even first and foremost. We should get 90% of our class from those 4 areas.
This is not rocket science. You morons saying we need to camp out in Dallas or Atlanta are just that, morons. How do you expect to beat every other program in the country, with no built in advantage? We can drive to LA, MS and AL while all the others cannot. Use it.
I would say TN and AR but they don't have much talent. Rural GA is another area we probably have an advantage, at least the Columbus/LaGrange area.
They really do, it's comical. Some slapdick atotal360 actually wants us to use Alabama's current blueprint (after 4 national titles) and recruit California kids.Don't bother. They're convinced we're Bama and Saban's gonna jump on board as soon as we run Dan out of town.
Recruiting our own area better gives us a better percentage play to bring in better players, than going to GA and TX.You've basically admitted we suck at recruiting in own backyard and we need to keep doing it
Because they aren't getting the best players. Stop over-thinking.I'd say stick a little closer to the 171 miles we're currently at than go all-in for California. But we definitely need to expand our horizons a bit. One look at the other 4 schools in the closest to home 5 tells a lot. South Florida, LA Tech, Troy and UNC-Charlotte. If recruiting close to home is such a winner, why is everyone else doing it such losers?
I'll spell this out one last time because it's obvious you do not actually read posts where your points are rebutted:Because we will NEVER get all the best players in our immediate area because they're all either in Bama's immediate area or Mississippi's. But go ahead and keep living in your dream world where we can pull in all those players.
I have not backtracked on anything. Search the history.Now you're just backtracking and saying two different things. First you ***** about how we should have never lost Lashley and Brown, and now you're saying we only need to "take our share" of MS talent. By definition, "taking our share" means we will miss on several of them. More than half actually, since UM's share would be pretty close to ours and Bama and LSU would also have a share. Again, there's a reason most of the schools in the closest 5 are doormats.
Rivals Basketball Recruiting
4-star center Chris Brown commits to Mississippi State
Maroon and White Football
Mississippi State Week 11 Preview: Auburn Q and A
Maroon and White Basketball
Mississippi State vs. Xavier: How, Where, and When to Watch Bulldog Basketball
Maroon and White
"I started something I didn't finish": Mississippi State QB Kamario Taylor joins Sports Center to talk 2027 return
Maroon and White Basketball
Bulldogs prepare to level up competition, starting with Xavier in neutral site meeting