Consider this proposal: Someone posts a message that you disagree with. In turn, you calmly state your opposition and why; without calling him stupid, a jerk, a hygiene product, or something worse.
When you support your position with insults, you're weakening your own argument and strengthening the other guy's. Plus, it gets real old -- scanning through all the silly posts in order to get to something intelligent.
Yes, I've responded strongly to people who disagreed with me, but I don't recall calling them stupid. If I have, and there's one guy who actually researches old posts, I'll do better in the future.
When you support your position with insults, you're weakening your own argument and strengthening the other guy's. Plus, it gets real old -- scanning through all the silly posts in order to get to something intelligent.
Yes, I've responded strongly to people who disagreed with me, but I don't recall calling them stupid. If I have, and there's one guy who actually researches old posts, I'll do better in the future.
