Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="OlegeezEER" data-source="post: 132019937" data-attributes="member: 1835316"><p>For starts conference expansion is driven by football not basketball. A 68 team tourney is much more inclusive than a 4 team tourney. The big 12 hasn't won a national championship in football in over 15 years and hasn't played for one in over ten years. Trying to tout accomplishments of teams that are not in the bIg 12 is bogus. How do you know they would have even made a bowl game if they played a power 5 schedule. Wvu's success in the mid 2000's didn't lead to an acc invite but somehow the pitts of the world ended up there. If the big 12 has had a tremendous&nbsp; amount of more success than the Acc than why do Clemson and Fsu have national championships in the last 10 years while no Big 12 team has played for one. The pac hasn't had much success but they have a bigger demographic profile than the big 12 and still have a blue blood remaining in their conference.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="OlegeezEER, post: 132019937, member: 1835316"] For starts conference expansion is driven by football not basketball. A 68 team tourney is much more inclusive than a 4 team tourney. The big 12 hasn't won a national championship in football in over 15 years and hasn't played for one in over ten years. Trying to tout accomplishments of teams that are not in the bIg 12 is bogus. How do you know they would have even made a bowl game if they played a power 5 schedule. Wvu's success in the mid 2000's didn't lead to an acc invite but somehow the pitts of the world ended up there. If the big 12 has had a tremendous amount of more success than the Acc than why do Clemson and Fsu have national championships in the last 10 years while no Big 12 team has played for one. The pac hasn't had much success but they have a bigger demographic profile than the big 12 and still have a blue blood remaining in their conference. [/QUOTE]

Name