Boomboom...

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
60,186
3,701
113
Id be interested as to what they define as threats.

Something tells me the concentration will not match the math I've seen. Seriously spread the word for people to call their Reps and ask. The canned answer they will give you isn't as important as they know you are concerned and the attention that will bring on the subject.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Something tells me the concentration will not match the math I've seen. Seriously spread the word for people to call their Reps and ask. The canned answer they will give you isn't as important as they know you are concerned and the attention that will bring on the subject.
Just talked to Capito yesterday. When I see her again I will ask her about it.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
Alternative media isnt always accurate. Unless you have bought into the deepstate conspiracy, I like information I can confirm through multiple sources.
So since you're coming clean in this thread with your "mea culpa" tell the board now what is your opinion of the Nunes memo you once claimed was false and non factual? His facts were confirmed, yet no one on here has ever read your posts admitting you were 100% dead wrong about his information on the collusion scam.

Why not?


excerpt
“Devin Nunes was proven correct — that’s what the report says. We should praise him, he stood up when others wanted to go after him for telling the truth," McCarthy said. "And then they allow someone who openly lied to us up until even last month and his only recourse is to attack the people who bring it forth."

Hey John Stewart, can you explain @Boomboom521's refusal to admit his error over the Nunes memo?
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
Your goal is obvious. Nobody could be as simple and naive as you try to act.
He is as disingenuous as he is fraudulent. He's an undiluted full bore Leftist who arrogantly tries to come off as some objective, unbiased, analytical, truth seeker but the fact is he NEVER admits when his Leftist view is wrong.

NEVER.
 
Last edited:

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
You may be that naive but I am not naive enough to believe it.
Call me naive, most of the time I take it as a compliment. Call me ignorant, although a little hurtful, I am pretty confident in my ability to analyze content. But dont call me fake, I think what i dislike the most about this world is how many false souls i interact with regularly. I dont know how someone can live like that, and i never will.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
Call me naive, most of the time I take it as a compliment. Call me ignorant, although a little hurtful, I am pretty confident in my ability to analyze content. But dont call me fake, I think what i dislike the most about this world is how many false souls i interact with regularly. I dont know how someone can live like that, and i never will.
You are more fake than ignorant or naive. Ignorant and naive are the horse you ride in on. Fake is the ranch that gave you the horse.

You are not fooling anyone.
 

Brushy Bill

Hall of Famer
Mar 31, 2009
61,038
128,547
113
I think what i dislike the most about this world is how many false souls i interact with regularly.
That's because we live in a fallen world that has rejected the truth of our Creator God and instead relied on our own limited understanding. It's cliché but true, there is a God shaped hole in everyone that they are looking to fill with some sort of meaning. In the end though, unless that void if filled with the love of God then the emptiness persists.
 

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
If you’re seeking the truth, go to One America News (OANN). It’s unbiased.
I was trying to look at the CDC director interview and how it was covered, but i cant even read the article due to pop up ads. And what i could read of the article, it never referenced that she was talking about the Omicron variant AND vaccinated patients. Every tweet (by Doctors that could be anyone) in that article, also seemed to make her comments about ALL patients of COVID, and social media (including some on here) have used it as evidence of juked stats.
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
I was trying to look at the CDC director interview and how it was covered, but i cant even read the article due to pop up ads. And what i could read of the article, it never referenced that she was talking about the Omicron variant AND vaccinated patients. Every tweet (by Doctors that could be anyone) in that article, also seemed to make her comments about ALL patients of COVID, and social media (including some on here) have used it as evidence of juked stats.
So, you don’t like the results because it doesn’t fit your brainwashed ideology? Good. Keep reading it. I’m pulling for your complete recovery.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
You are more fake than ignorant or naive. Ignorant and naive are the horse you ride in on. Fake is the ranch that gave you the horse.

You are not fooling anyone.
You do notice how he refuses to admit he was 100% dead wrong about Nunes and in fact that entire fake, fraudulent, dishonest, phony, made up Russian collusion scam? He lives in a fake world like the rest of the Left does!

He and no one on the Left will ever admit it was a completely false narrative as well as an illegal, unconstitutional violation of Trump's rights and that he in fact was 100% innocent of all those spurious charges incubated, promulgated, disseminated, and falsely manufactured by the Left and everyone who believed every false word of it.

Want to understand the truth about him? Look how he avoids admitting he believed a completely fabricated lie and still refuses to this day to accept it! 😏
 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
You are more fake than ignorant or naive. Ignorant and naive are the horse you ride in on. Fake is the ranch that gave you the horse.

You are not fooling anyone.
Well stated
 

WVUALLEN

All-American
Aug 4, 2009
72,702
5,500
113
So what do you think about the leftist Antifa rioter, who fled the scene on January 6th, now caught and he had a pipe bomb in his backpack?

What do you think about the left wanting a federal takeover of elections, stripping power from the states and making them strictly the responsibility of the federal government? You know. Like Communists and dictatorships?

Can you say totalitarianism?

Shows the left is terrified of losing power. They are doomed unless they get Communism and dictatorships control.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
I am pretty confident in my ability to analyze content. But dont call me fake,
You're fake. Analyzed factual content clearly demonstrates the Nunes memo was 100% correct when YOU claimed it was false and now you're so fake you can't admit YOU were wrong and he was correct!

Yes, you're 100% fake.
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
You're fake. Analyzed factual content clearly demonstrates the Nunes memo was 100% correct when YOU claimed it was false and now you're so fake you can't admit YOU were wrong and he was correct!

Yes, you're 100% fake.
I would tell him to go to OANN again, but he seemed as confused and demented as Biden on the network content. I think his last visit earlier really devastated him to learn his entire ideology was false.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
I would tell him to go to OANN again, but he seemed as confused and demented as Biden on the network content. I think his last visit earlier really devastated him to learn his entire ideology was false.
Which is further proof of how phony he is. He'll NEVER admit his Leftist beliefs are fake...even when demonstrably proven to be so! Yet he's on here crying about being called "fake" when he can't even admit to the facts proving he is!
 
Last edited:

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
So, you don’t like the results because it doesn’t fit your brainwashed ideology? Good. Keep reading it. I’m pulling for your complete recovery.
I will keep reading, but my point was more towards the article not providing proper context, which is essential, imo.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
60,186
3,701
113
She's the kind of person who would dox you and your family if you don't agree or simply cancel your account. She's all about control.


 
Last edited:

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,206
3,282
113
Not everyone on the left has the end goal of communism, i think most are actually opposed to it, but that seems to be the goal of every policy initiative of the left in the mind of some posters.
They may not have that as an end goal, but every policy action while we’ll intentioned is just one more coal on the fire of the runaway freight train towards it. Anything easing up on personal accountability is wrong, and almost policy action on the left is designed to benefit the collective and not the individual.
 
Last edited:

Boomboom521

Redshirt
Mar 14, 2014
20,115
6
0
They may not have that as an end goal, but every policy action while we’ll intentioned is just one more coal on the fire of the runaway freight train towards it. Anything easing up on personal accountability is wrong, and almost policy action on the left is designed to benefit the collective and not the individual.
But if social programs are better evaluated for effectiveness, and only offered as a temporary bridge to self sustainability, they can, as designed and intended, benefit society as a whole. Im talking programs like unemployment, scholarships, public school funding, relocation reimbursement, and technical/vocational training used only as temporary benefits to the individual- and managed by linking a network of contacts in academia, government, and the private sector.

I can understand the skepticism and even anger at social programs, when managed as poorly as they are, abused as much as they are, and used to influence votes/ sustain a bureaucratic self serving monster.

What do we do with those that refuse to lift themselves up by their bootstraps? Their children?
 

30CAT

All-American
May 29, 2001
171,156
5,044
113
But if social programs are better evaluated for effectiveness, and only offered as a temporary bridge to self sustainability, they can, as designed and intended, benefit society as a whole. Im talking programs like unemployment, scholarships, public school funding, relocation reimbursement, and technical/vocational training used only as temporary benefits to the individual- and managed by linking a network of contacts in academia, government, and the private sector.

I can understand the skepticism and even anger at social programs, when managed as poorly as they are, abused as much as they are, and used to influence votes/ sustain a bureaucratic self serving monster.

What do we do with those that refuse to lift themselves up by their bootstraps? Their children?

Maybe it wouldn't be such an eye sore if we weren't giving these benefits to illegal foreign nationals and giving them the right to vote in our country?

Maybe if there wasn't a push from the left to call it "voter suppression" to require voter IDs?

Some of us can put two and two together.

Open the borders and incentivize people from all over the world to come here illegally. Spread them around the country, in the cover of night, especially to Red states. Give them all of those benefits you just mentioned, paid for by tax-paying citizens. Free housing, welfare, education...etc. Talk about incentives.

Federal take over elections from the states.

Why is the left pushing for all of that? Take your blinders off.
 

Brushy Bill

Hall of Famer
Mar 31, 2009
61,038
128,547
113
But if social programs are better evaluated for effectiveness, and only offered as a temporary bridge to self sustainability, they can, as designed and intended, benefit society as a whole. Im talking programs like unemployment, scholarships, public school funding, relocation reimbursement, and technical/vocational training used only as temporary benefits to the individual- and managed by linking a network of contacts in academia, government, and the private sector.

I can understand the skepticism and even anger at social programs, when managed as poorly as they are, abused as much as they are, and used to influence votes/ sustain a bureaucratic self serving monster.

What do we do with those that refuse to lift themselves up by their bootstraps? Their children?
Why do you think it is possible to do that effectively or efficiently? They would just become bureaucratic nightmares like all the current programs are.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
Maybe it wouldn't be such an eye sore if we weren't giving these benefits to illegal foreign nationals and giving them the right to vote in our country?

Maybe if there wasn't a push from the left to call it "voter suppression" to require voter IDs?

Some of us can put two and two together.

Open the borders and incentivize people from all over the world to come here illegally. Spread them around the country, in the cover of night, especially to Red states. Give them all of those benefits you just mentioned, paid for by tax-paying citizens. Free housing, welfare, education...etc. Talk about incentives.

Federal take over elections from the states.

Why is the left pushing for all of that? Take your blinders off.

Why do you think it is possible to do that effectively or efficiently? They would just become bureaucratic nightmares like all the current programs are.
He is just wanting a check
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,206
3,282
113
But if social programs are better evaluated for effectiveness, and only offered as a temporary bridge to self sustainability, they can, as designed and intended, benefit society as a whole.
The problem here is, they aren’t temporary. In a large percentage, they create generational dependency.
I can understand the skepticism and even anger at social programs, when managed as poorly as they are, abused as much as they are, and used to influence votes/ sustain a bureaucratic self serving monster.
And the left is only increasing them and the bureaucracy needed, which creates more in the cycle and then more bureaucracy.
What do we do with those that refuse to lift themselves up by their bootstraps? Their children?
Cut em loose or evolve it to work requirements like the CCC used to be. Time phase it, here is a 6 months safety net, after 6 months, you can sign up to work at X or you don’t get your check. You want Government assistance? You work for it.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
But if social programs are better evaluated for effectiveness, and only offered as a temporary bridge to self sustainability, they can, as designed and intended, benefit society as a whole. Im talking programs like unemployment, scholarships, public school funding, relocation reimbursement, and technical/vocational training used only as temporary benefits to the individual- and managed by linking a network of contacts in academia, government, and the private sector.

I can understand the skepticism and even anger at social programs, when managed as poorly as they are, abused as much as they are, and used to influence votes/ sustain a bureaucratic self serving monster.

What do we do with those that refuse to lift themselves up by their bootstraps? Their children?
Unemployment is a insurance paid in by the employers. Unless politicians want to buy votes with subsidies. I get a bum check every year . Its only good till what I paid in runs out . 20,000 or 6 months.
It is actually called unemployment insurance contractors pay into it not tax payers
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
Whatever happened to self reliance? Why is it always assumed on the Left folks can't do for themselves what they (Leftists) always see Government doing for people instead?

Anyone interested in how wrong the best meaning intentions to help the dispossessed go when government becomes involved needs to read this



"A richly documented, controversial history of the welfare state...." --Publishers Weekly

Perhaps @Boomboom521 in his never ending quest to view all sides of an issue would find this reading instructive to understand the opposition most of us taxpayers have to big government Welfare programs?

One can hope?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
But if social programs are better evaluated for effectiveness, and only offered as a temporary bridge to self sustainability, they can, as designed and intended, benefit society as a whole. Im talking programs like unemployment, scholarships, public school funding, relocation reimbursement, and technical/vocational training used only as temporary benefits to the individual- and managed by linking a network of contacts in academia, government, and the private sector.

I can understand the skepticism and even anger at social programs, when managed as poorly as they are, abused as much as they are, and used to influence votes/ sustain a bureaucratic self serving monster.

What do we do with those that refuse to lift themselves up by their bootstraps? Their children?
What is preventing them from first doing what they can for themselves, then asking for whatever additional help they need?
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
What is preventing them from first doing what they can for themselves, then asking for whatever additional help they need?
Most dont need help for things they need, they need help so they can have & do things they cant afford. More people than I care to say I know get government assistance & spend there own money on vacation & toys . People believe they have the right to be rich .... you only have the right to try & be rich
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
Most dont need help for things they need, they need help so they can have & do things they cant afford. More people than I care to say I know get government assistance & spend there own money on vacation & toys . People believe they have the right to be rich .... you only have the right to try & be rich
Democrats have brainwashed everyone to believe we are all equal. While we may be equal in rights and opportunities, we are far from equal. For the same reason I cannot dunk a basketball, I wouldn’t want LeBron James operating on me. Some people are wealthy because, like LeBron, they have an ability that generates a lot of money. In turn, he’s paid well. Minimum skills equal minimum wage. And that’s the correct wage, no matter what liberals like AOC and Bernie Sanders tell you.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
Democrats have brainwashed everyone to believe we are all equal. While we may be equal in rights and opportunities, we are far from equal. For the same reason I cannot dunk a basketball, I wouldn’t want LeBron James operating on me. Some people are wealthy because, like LeBron, they have an ability that generates a lot of money. In turn, he’s paid well. Minimum skills equal minimum wage. And that’s the correct wage, no matter what liberals like AOC and Bernie Sanders tell you.
People like boom makes me laugh. I have a very generous heart, my whole family does . People like him cant understand people get what they give & if they want more they can work more , there is some who does need help & a system to help those is a wonderful thing. I dont feel one bit sorry for several family members having nothing, they have nothing by choice. We all had the exact same opportunities & some had more than most but didn't make good choices, not my fault or mark zuckerberg's fault.
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
People like boom makes me laugh. I have a very generous heart, my whole family does . People like him cant understand people get what they give & if they want more they can work more , there is some who does need help & a system to help those is a wonderful thing. I dont feel one bit sorry for several family members having nothing, they have nothing by choice. We all had the exact same opportunities & some had more than most but didn't make good choices, not my fault or mark zuckerberg's fault.
Exactly. It reminds me of my days in college. Several of my friends went to college with me. All were given the opportunity to go by government loans and one of them went totally for free based on the color of his skin. Once there, they all chose to go to the bar every night while most nights I stayed behind and studied. All of them failed out. I graduated. Should they earn in pay what I earn? To me, they had the same equal opportunity to get what I eventually did. It was their poor choices. It wasn’t racism. It wasn’t sexism. It wasn’t privilege. It was poor choices. As I always say, it’s taking Personal responsibility. Msm and Democrats cannot comprehend that.
 

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,202
2,271
113
Exactly. It reminds me of my days in college. Several of my friends went to college with me. All were given the opportunity to go by government loans and one of them went totally for free based on the color of his skin. Once there, they all chose to go to the bar every night while most nights I stayed behind and studied. All of them failed out. I graduated. Should they earn in pay what I earn? To me, they had the same equal opportunity to get what I eventually did. It was their poor choices. It wasn’t racism. It wasn’t sexism. It wasn’t privilege. It was poor choices. As I always say, it’s taking Personal responsibility. Msm and Democrats cannot comprehend that.
I was raised fairly poor & I'm by no stretch rich now , but I'm very happy with the choices I've made , I'm comfortable. I dont want what I haven't earned & I'm not jealous of another person who has earned more .
 

ThePunish-EER

Freshman
Aug 19, 2005
13,313
59
0
I was raised fairly poor & I'm by no stretch rich now , but I'm very happy with the choices I've made , I'm comfortable. I dont want what I haven't earned & I'm not jealous of another person who has earned more .
Same here. I’m lucky I had a good upbringing that taught me to be thankful for those opportunities and to earn my own way. I was a poor kid growing up. I never realized I was financially poor until I grew up and left home. I was just lucky to have good parents who loved me and taught me right from wrong.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,337
5,875
113
it’s taking Personal responsibility. Msm and Democrats cannot comprehend that.
In my opinion, THIS is the #1 problem facing the country. Lack of taking individual personal responsibility...blaming others for what YOU lack or refuse to do.

Closely followed by ill informed or brainwashed voters fed by a biased news media which refuses to hold politicians responsible for their bad ideas or poor policy choices/results.