It's funny how you wingnuts continue to harp on "sources". Are you really that naive? The press has been reporting news on administrations since the beginning of the country based on anonymous sources. Watergate was cracked by the press based on anonymous sources. So was Iran-contra. It seems to me that the only "fake news" out there is from Fox News and Breitbart,each of whom are not interested in the truth. They are interested in promoting and protecting conservatives at all costs. Anything other than that is "fake" according to them. And their audience of deplorables is too ignorant and too lazy to actually consider the facts. Sure, the press gets it wrong now and then. But the NY Times and the WashPo don't have dozens of Pulitzers for disseminating falsehoods. You people refuse to accept the truth.
It's interesting you would cite the example of the media's reporting on watergate RPJ. If you remember, those stories by Woodward and Bernstein weren't published until their "sources" were backed up by on the record officials. In fact if you watch the famous movie rendition about their investigative Journalism, "all the President's men" the entire story is about how painstaking and difficult it was for them to tie the story down based only on annoymous sources!
Often times they wanted to report 'leaks' or 'tips' without corroboration and Editor Ben Bradley made them go back and get sourced confirmations of their allegations before their stories were published.
There is nothing even remotely close to their detailed and thorough reporting compared to this side show going on now with the media and Trump. The New York Times publishes a story about a memo allegedly read to them over the phone by a former Comey aide who alleges obstruction of justice on the part of the President of the United States? This is reported as FACT?
Do youself a favor RPJ and go watch that movie, it might give you some perspective over how far the 4th estate has fallen.
Last edited: