She was an Obama hold over who refused to defend trumps temporary refugee ban in court. Trumps actions clearly are constitutional thus she was shirking her responsibilities and letting her ideology control her actions. Good for Trump.
Same thing would happen if we defied our boss. I guess she felt she had to make a stand. She had about a week of work left anyway so no big deal.
She was an Obama hold over who refused to defend trumps temporary refugee ban in court. Trumps actions clearly are constitutional thus she was shirking her responsibilities and letting her ideology control her actions. Good for Trump.
True dat.Same thing would happen if we defied our boss. I guess she felt she had to make a stand. She had about a week of work left anyway so no big deal.
Nice reply--makes sense too.
It just depends on how big of a deal she wants to make it.
It is not the job of the AG to take orders from the President.
I am truly amazed at the ignorance of a lot of posters on this board on the role of various positions within government.
It is not the job of the AG to take orders from the President.
Like, Lynch didn't take orders from Obama and ex-President Clinton.
Isn't the AG under the executive branch? Why couldn't he fire her?
She can maje whatever deal she wants. She would lose.It just depends on how big of a deal she wants to make it.
It is not the job of the AG to take orders from the President.
I am truly amazed at the ignorance of a lot of posters on this board on the role of various positions within government.
Isn't the AG under the executive branch? Why couldn't he fire her?
Not only is it under the executive branch she is in a pisition that is at the will of the president.Isn't the AG under the executive branch? Why couldn't he fire her?
It just depends on how big of a deal she wants to make it.
It is not the job of the AG to take orders from the President.
I am truly amazed at the ignorance of a lot of posters on this board on the role of various positions within government.
Not only is it under the executive branch she is in a pisition that is at the will of the president.
Pretty sure the AG serves at the pleasure of the President.If he could prove dereliction of duty. She could also claim the firing was politically motivated, which is illegal.
Water is wet.He has full authority to do so. I don't think the poster knew what he was talking about.
Surely you know that he has every legal right to fire her.
Pretty sure the AG serves at the pleasure of the President.
Pretty sure the AG serves at the pleasure of the President.
And?The Judiciary Act of 1789 created the Office of the Attorney General which evolved over the years into the head of the Department of Justice and chief law enforcement officer of the Federal Government. The Attorney General represents the United States in legal matters generally and gives advice and opinions to the President and to the heads of the executive departments of the Government when so requested. In matters of exceptional gravity or importance the Attorney General appears in person before the Supreme Court. Since the 1870 Act that established the Department of Justice as an executive department of the government of the United States, the Attorney General has guided the world's largest law office and the central agency for enforcement of federal laws.
Better tell this CBS reporter (who happens to cover the Justice Dept) - “As acting attorney general she serves at the pleasure of the president and he could certainly fire her,” Reid said.I'm not surprised.
Or maybe tell that to former AG Alberto Gonzales...I'm not surprised.
Give me billions and NYC and my history would dwarf his in a week. Hell, I'd buy the New York Times and make up stuff.If she was hotter I am sure she WOULDHe has a history you know.
Give me billions and NYC and my history would dwarf his in a week. Hell, I'd buy the New York Times and make up stuff.
Question - is the AG a Cabinet member selected by the President? Aren't all Cabinet members serving at the pleasure of the President?I'm not surprised.
I'm not surprised.
Question - is the AG a Cabinet member selected by the President? Aren't all Cabinet members serving at the pleasure of the President?
Ha! That's why we'd buy The New York Times.At my age I'm limited to one a day without meds. I'd never catch up
Someone disappeared from this thread. Odd.
Truly a waste of money.Ha! That's why we'd buy The New York Times.
Read this....then keep in mind there were several federal laws that resulted from this fiasco preventing firing for political purposes.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/watergate/articles/102173-2.htm
Are you talking about me? Really I have embarrassed you enough for the day but since you asked for it.
Four federal judges have now issued stays against Trump's order. The state of Washington is now filing suit against Trump, others to follow.
And all of this just in the first week. LOL!
Many conservatives have agreed the rollout of this executive order has been ill advised and ill orchestrated. In other words, what a disaster. Mitch McConnell himself said it is a very bad policy. [laughing][laughing][laughing]
Nice try at changing the subject...now back to how the AG serves at the pleasure of the President...he or she does.Are you talking about me? Really I have embarrassed you enough for the day but since you asked for it.
Four federal judges have now issued stays against Trump's order. The state of Washington is now filing suit against Trump, others to follow.
And all of this just in the first week. LOL!
Many conservatives have agreed the rollout of this executive order has been ill advised and ill orchestrated. In other words, what a disaster. Mitch McConnell himself said it is a very bad policy. [laughing][laughing][laughing]