Brook 31 Oswego 30 2 OT FINAL

RD_Watcher

Senior
Oct 5, 2019
801
745
0
Thanks for the update. I would guess it was something in the realm of targeting. Anything else would have likely been an unsportsmanlike penalty.
Just making an assumption, as I am not watching the game.
 

RockSoup

All-Conference
Oct 1, 2009
3,192
4,860
0
Thanks for the update. I would guess it was something in the realm of targeting. Anything else would have likely been an unsportsmanlike penalty.
Just making an assumption, as I am not watching the game.
Same here. I just remember being told that last year when I asked. I guess anything over the line can be called unsportsmanlike But now we just sound like two guys that didn’t see the play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RD_Watcher

Wolffan64

Junior
Sep 26, 2017
392
363
0
Thanks for the update. I would guess it was something in the realm of targeting. Anything else would have likely been an unsportsmanlike penalty.
Just making an assumption, as I am not watching the game.
One of the Bolingbrook players took a swing at an Oswego player earlier in the game. He missed and an official was having a conversation with him. I’m wondering if it is the same player. I can’t even read the numbers on the jerseys because the lack of pixels
 
  • Like
Reactions: RD_Watcher

Kevin JCHS 81

All-Conference
Jul 16, 2005
1,893
1,503
0
One of the Bolingbrook players took a swing at an Oswego player earlier in the game. He missed and an official was having a conversation with him. I’m wondering if it is the same player. I can’t even read the numbers on the jerseys because the lack of pixels
Yeah I saw that too. Wonder if it was the same player.

It was an OL who took the swing.
 

PowerI66_

All-Conference
Oct 11, 2012
3,943
2,894
0
Refs and coaches on the thread, correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think there’s a penalty for targeting in HS unless it changed this year
"In NFHS play, using the crown of the helmet to strike an opponent is a spearing foul (2-20-1c), while contacting any opponent by taking aim above the shoulders is a targeting foul (2-20-2). Disqualification is not a part of either penalty unless the foul is judged to be flagrant. Consequently, all players are protected from targeting and a defenseless player is primarily a point of emphasis. Officials need to recognize defenseless players and must be especially vigilant for fouls against them with consideration given to disqualification."
 

RD_Watcher

Senior
Oct 5, 2019
801
745
0
"In NFHS play, using the crown of the helmet to strike an opponent is a spearing foul (2-20-1c), while contacting any opponent by taking aim above the shoulders is a targeting foul (2-20-2). Disqualification is not a part of either penalty unless the foul is judged to be flagrant. Consequently, all players are protected from targeting and a defenseless player is primarily a point of emphasis. Officials need to recognize defenseless players and must be especially vigilant for fouls against them with consideration given to disqualification."
Thank you for the direct citation.
 

superac777

Junior
Aug 28, 2006
990
387
0
Refs and coaches on the thread, correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think there’s a penalty for targeting in HS unless it changed this year
Kid in TN where I live ejected for it.Got lawyers & TSSAA reviewed it & overturned so he got to play the next game but missed 3 1/2 quarters of the game he was ejected
 

Kevin JCHS 81

All-Conference
Jul 16, 2005
1,893
1,503
0
Brook having a very hard time moving the ball against Oswego. It's a good thing their defense is playing well.

WAS playing well, TD Oswego.