Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="spartansstink" data-source="post: 131068816" data-attributes="member: 1488840">Perhaps if WVU would have had KSU's coach last year WE could have beaten Oklahoma?Perhaps if WVU would have KSU's coach anytime in the last eight we could have beaten Oklahoma?Our poor excuse of a coach never did.To be truthful, he only won 10 games once. The first one doesn't count because, in your own words, he didn't play the most difficult schedule since it was just a Big East one, right?What did that one Skyler Howard 10 win season get us? A major bowl? Nope! Another 10 win season? Nope!Just a number in a record book and back to mediocrity.Now, you've gone and projected the next four years as losing seasons for WVU based on one? Too funny! Fools folly right there.This &quot;WVU has to win to recruit well&quot; may not be far off, though. That is perhaps the reason Dana isn't here anymore and Brown isn't winning now. If Dana would have won something of significance besides going barely .500 every year we'd have more wins, better recruits, and Dana would still have his job.But a barely over .500 record isn't &quot;winning now and winning often&quot; now is it?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="spartansstink, post: 131068816, member: 1488840"] Perhaps if WVU would have had KSU's coach last year WE could have beaten Oklahoma? Perhaps if WVU would have KSU's coach anytime in the last eight we could have beaten Oklahoma? Our poor excuse of a coach never did. To be truthful, he only won 10 games once. The first one doesn't count because, in your own words, he didn't play the most difficult schedule since it was just a Big East one, right? What did that one Skyler Howard 10 win season get us? A major bowl? Nope! Another 10 win season? Nope! Just a number in a record book and back to mediocrity. Now, you've gone and projected the next four years as losing seasons for WVU based on one? Too funny! Fools folly right there. This "WVU has to win to recruit well" may not be far off, though. That is perhaps the reason Dana isn't here anymore and Brown isn't winning now. If Dana would have won something of significance besides going barely .500 every year we'd have more wins, better recruits, and Dana would still have his job. But a barely over .500 record isn't "winning now and winning often" now is it? [/QUOTE]

Name