Bubble Watch: Stanford 70, Arizona St. 61 Final

jamdawg96

Redshirt
Feb 27, 2008
1,523
0
36
Winning only two games in Nashville might end up being enough. Three teams all but ended their hopes today. Two of them were considered "in" when the day started. Gonna be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,009
19,406
113
And they say they want to expand the field to add more teams. No more than the field of 65 deserves to get in.
 

seshomoru

Sophomore
Apr 24, 2006
5,542
199
63
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

If it weren't about money, there would be talk about expanding the women's tourney as well. Maybe there is and I just haven't heard/don't really care.
 

seshomoru

Sophomore
Apr 24, 2006
5,542
199
63
It's not like they can cram more games onto TV with the current contract. So, there will be a buy out. ESPN will get it. We'll get the same coverage CBS gave us on ESPN. ESPN2 will show a prime time game, and ESPNU will show some afternoon stuff. They'll up their rates because they'll have to cover the cost of the bid. DirecTVs March Madness package will go up. Advertising prices will go up.

The NCAA will make a crap ton of money off this, and then because they care so much for the student athlete, they'll sell licenses for video games, apparel, etc. to make even more money off of them all while making sure they don't get even one extra pair of Reeboks.
 

Optimus Prime 4

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
8,560
0
0
which is a plus. And it will be full of the games that are fun, smaller decently matched teams battling and hustling and fighting for wins. The 16 vs 1 matchups will be the second weekend, as the top 32 or whatever will likely get byes. I can dig it.
 

IBleedMaroonDawg

All-American
Nov 12, 2007
25,444
9,665
113
There are endless sources of money in a real playoff system for football even with a much smaller field than the basketball tourney.
 

seshomoru

Sophomore
Apr 24, 2006
5,542
199
63
as I am the true motivation behind it. They will spit up some drivel about how it's good for the Universities, good for the players, good for everyone, etc. However, when there really is something that is good for the Universities, good for the players, good for everyone that they can't make money off of, they throw out the tired "looking out for the student athlete" argument.

In other words, the NCAA's line of thinking is if they can't exploit the athletes and Universities for more huge sums of money, then It must be bad for the athletes and the Universities.