rugbdawg said:
You get more points for continued giving, buying tickets, etc. There are appropriate mechanisms in place where you can't just buy your way in. But...to encourage large gifts and help a program reach the next step large wads of cash are important and necessary. I would sit 10,000 feet in the air if we had the kind of success Bama or Florida had this year. You forget that this is BIG business. I take it you disagree with the Hump reseating.
Isn't your reasoning selfish? You don't want to encourage large gifts and donations because you are cynical from past years and feel like you deserve some sort of prize? That's absolutely ridiculous, against the growth of the program, and against success for the football team.
...football is not seated by BC ranking, it's seated upon a seat license policy. If I have my seats and I'm willing to continue paying the seat license amount for them and you want them, then you're out of luck. Now the reality of it is that if you want to sit in Section D between the 40's, then not everybody in Section D is going to renew and continue giving every single year regardless of results on the field, so you could probably still buy your way in there in a given year, but you're not going to be allowed to boot anybody down.
If they decide my seats in Section B are worth more than the currently mandated $50/seat, then that's fine, I'll pay it*, but you're not going to show up with $200 in hand per seat and take them away. (*-and my BC donation already is far more than what it would cost to keep my seats, for the record....I'm not cheapskating my way in there.)
My point is that you're speaking as though DWS is handled like the Hump is now, when it's not. And for the record, I didn't have a problem with what they did at the Hump. It holds far less people than a football stadium, and due to the high demand, should clearly be seated in accordance with priority. That was a good change they made.