Bury's 2 Technical Fouls This Year Have Cost Us 2 Games

ExtremeDog

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
1,407
179
63
Thanks Bury! Great job coaching!! You have just cost your team the tournament!!</p>
 

ExtremeDog

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
1,407
179
63
Thanks Bury! Great job coaching!! You have just cost your team the tournament!!</p>
 

Woosaa

Redshirt
Jun 25, 2007
80
0
0
If not then you reasoning skills are off, at least for this game. I haven't been listening so I don't know when it happened.
 

rugbdawg

Redshirt
Oct 10, 2006
5,251
0
0
I'm not sure what it was for, but the general consensus seems to be that he got out of the box. He certainly wasn't upset about anything.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
My buddy at the game said it was on the bench and it was ******** again. If we make a damn free throw in the first half we win, so quit bitching about the damn t.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
My friend told me nobody knows what the technical was for and it surely wasn't against Stans, Hell, we scored on the play and then the zebras tried to say it was for a delay of game which is BS without a warning. I'm sure this upsets the Stans haters like Extreme and his co-harts who simply love to ***** every chance they get. My buddy told me it was another joke of a game from the officials, Barry got mugged and nothing was called and then they turned around and called a cheap *** foul on Jarvis. We still had a chance to win and unfortunately we didn't but so far today every home team in the league has won. I still say the free throw shooting killed us in the first half and we never recovered. I guess I can count one thing though everytime we lose, the Stans haters will come out gloating and none of them know jack schit about basketball.
 

38843dawg

Redshirt
Nov 20, 2008
1,915
0
25
I was sitting there thinking it was Stans, but he was on one knee, behind the line, so I have no idea. And if it was a delay on Varnado thats ********, because as soon as he dunked it he turned around and ran down to play defense. By the way Stewart got <17>ed up over head by Hillman and nothing was called. Stewart laid on this stomach under the goal while it was 5 on 4 in favor of Bama.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
Same thing I was told by my buddy and he said all the MSU coaches were shocked about the T. It won't matter, we have folks who would rather ***** and I actually got on the chat board today on Six Pack and I swear, the bitchers were actually hoping we lost. Now, that is sad unless they are really not MSU fans. They ***** about every player and I would almost wager very few of them ever played a game past grade school. Barry Stewart played his heart out and yes, it would have been good had he made the winning shot, but none of them were forced today and the folks on the chat persecuted him and Bailey. I don't think Bailey is that good but he is all we had after Jarvis went out. Hell, I guess coach 34 didn't chime in much after I saw he tried to post his bets on todays game with Ky leading by 16 late in the game. Our fans amaze me, and we might be the most negative s.o.b.'s on the face of the earth.
 

Woosaa

Redshirt
Jun 25, 2007
80
0
0
rugbdawg said:
for Bama that Stans GAVE them. They cost us the game in both.
You need to re-examine how you think about basketball. 2 points with a lot of time left in the game does not change the outcome. Without that call a lot of things may have (and probably would have) gone differently in the game. Coaches get Techs on purpose in basketball to light a fire under the players asses. If it was a BS tech call like some are saying, it may have lit a fire under our players asses today. Basketball is a different animal than a game like football, where one officials call can actually change a game. If a call is made at the end of the game, then yes it is that significant, but with a lot of time left on the clock it is not.

It is more significant if it was indeed called on JV and counted as a personal foul, contributing to him fouling out of the game.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
You are correct Woosa but it was called with about 15 minutes left so it was awful but not what beat us. In a game like this each team can pick a dozen plays that matter but it wasn't Stans this time and poor free throw shooting in the first half was more of a factor and we still get little from Augustus, Osby, and the other inside players.
 

Ol Blue.sixpack

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
1,681
0
0
Dawgbreeze said:
none of them know jack schit about basketball.

Here's the extent of your basketball knowledge. 1. Stans has yet to make his first mistake as a coach. 2. When State loses, it's either the players' or LT's fault 3. The refs suck. 3 trick pony, if you will.
 

QuaoarsKing

All-Conference
Mar 11, 2008
5,783
2,368
113
rugbdawg said:
for Bama that Stans GAVE them. They cost us the game in both.
Had the tech not occured, the coaches and players would have reacted differently and called different plays as the situations changed. Swings in momentum could have caused either team to win the game by a bigger margin, or who knows. You can't say some play with 15 minutes to go cost the game, because you can't say what would've happened if it had been different.
 

Frances Drebin

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2005
1,639
0
0
...I wasn't there, and I didn't see it, but I feel about 120% confident that if a tech was called for delay of game, there was a prior warning about it. That's the way it works. As much as it goes against the "us against the world" mentality of most State fans, refs aren't going to arbitrarily call technical fouls against MSU.
 

Ol Blue.sixpack

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
1,681
0
0
Frances Drebin said:
...I wasn't there, and I didn't see it, but I feel about 120% confident that if a tech was called for delay of game, there was a prior warning about it. That's the way it works. As much as it goes against the "us against the world" mentality of most State fans, refs aren't going to arbitrarily call technical fouls against MSU.

IF CoastDawgbreezelover actually talked to someone who sat behind the bench, that person MIGHT be slightly more objective than Meo.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
Funny how you said there was a prior warning,Frances. Who told you that? I listened to the game and talked to two people who were there and they didn't see it. You, Blue Balls, Extreme Dawg, Coach and a few others blame Stans for every loss. I never said he was perfect but he didn't lose this game and before you and your cohorts try and run him off, better make sure you have someone better. And yes, Blue Balls, I thought LT was a joke, and I think it has been proven he is but Stansbury has won his share and he has lost some too but this years team is a work in progress and I would hate to be a player on this team or their parents to read the crap posted on this board. You and your cohorts are 17'ing sick.
 

patdog

Heisman
May 28, 2007
56,007
25,007
113
You have the ability to tell us what happened at a game you weren't at and didn't see. I wish I had your clairvoyant powers.
 

Ol Blue.sixpack

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
1,681
0
0
Dawgbreeze said:
Funny how you said there was a prior warning,Frances. Who told you that? I listened to the game and talked to two people who were there and they didn't see it. You, Blue Balls, Extreme Dawg, Coach and a few others blame Stans for every loss. I never said he was perfect but he didn't lose this game and before you and your cohorts try and run him off, better make sure you have someone better. And yes, Blue Balls, I thought LT was a joke, and I think it has been proven he is but Stansbury has won his share and he has lost some too but this years team is a work in progress and I would hate to be a player on this team or their parents to read the crap posted on this board. You and your cohorts are 17'ing sick.

You want to provide the links where I've blamed "Stans for every loss"? How about linking those posts where I bash the players? You're the one that's always talking about how players missing shots are the problem, Chief.
 

Ol Blue.sixpack

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
1,681
0
0
patdog said:
You have the ability to tell us what happened at a game you weren't at and didn't see. I wish I had your clairvoyant powers.

You don't have to go to the game to know the rules.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
Last I checked no coach ever missed a shot, made a bad pass, didn't block out, or made a dumb foul. Nobody is perfect but see how many players are bashed on here and that is pale compared to the bashing of Stans. You rarely see me bash a player and I never said Stans is perfect either but he is a hell of a lot better than what we've had in the past and right now he is a hell of alot better than Pearl, Pelphrey, and some others who are struggling too. I noticed you picked us to lose too Blue, I guess you were right, but Peaches tried to get by today by posting his so-called winning streak on betting and the KY game was almost over, so I called his *** out too. If he is so smart, let's see him post before the tip off's and then we'll know. All I know is that our players and coaches want to win more than any jerks on this board, including me, and it is easy as hell to second guess after the fact.
 

Frances Drebin

Redshirt
Nov 16, 2005
1,639
0
0
...learn how to reply in a thread, jackass.

Secondly, I don't have to be there. Technicals for delay of game aren't called arbitrarily. There is a reason it was called.
 

Coach34

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2012
20,283
1
0
today sealed out fate for 2009 unless we win the SEC Tourney- and that aint happening

1 Tourney, last 4 seasons...Ricky's job is on the line in 2010- thats a cold, hard fact....</p>
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
I think you are probably right but we will make the tourney next year and we do have an AD who holds people accountable so that is okay too. Meanwhile, we will watch everytime we lose, you and your buddies start the fire Stans talk and showing your ignorance about not being able to coach. Our makeup of our team is very similiar to Duke's and they live and die by the three just like we do and I don't see anybody saying Coach K is a bad coach. It is simply playing the hand you are dealt and this might be one of Rick's better coaching jobs considering his lack of size and the youth like Osby and Augustus not stepping up.
 

ExtremeDog

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
1,407
179
63
Anyone who compares us to Duke has no clue as to what in the hell they are talking about.
 

Dawgbreeze

Redshirt
Jun 11, 2007
1,655
0
0
Look Jerk, I never said we were Duke, but you check how they are having to play this year and you will see that they have hardly any losses when they shoot better than 35% from 3 point range. Now, idiots like you can't get past their hatred for our coach to see it is how we are having to play. So go back to your sandbox, take your meds for once, and enjoy life for a change. I know it is hard for you to be happy when we win, but you ain't going to get rid of our coach this year and won't next year either when he gets us back in the dance. And by the way, watching Duke vs Wake last night the announcers said the same thing, the Devils will live and die by the three. Sorry to burst your biased bubble.
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
Glad someone else sees it the same way with this team, we have to shoot lights out to have any chance of winning...
This is not your usual Bury team that relies on defense and rebounding......