I still view a contract as a mutually beneficial agreement
& I think coaches are given to much in their contracts, I don't necessarily disagree w/ the big numbers (see Saben & what he has done for Alabama), but the coaches are being given too much of a win / win scenario on their side of the contract. It is not that the university should be able to take money from the coach, but specifically in Crooms case, & especially if he under-performs next year (which there is nothing to indicate he won't), I simply feel we should owe him nothing based on un-realized revenue. Any value that Croom brought to the table in additional giving, apparel sales, trinket sales, are gone now b/c the product that is MSU football has little or no value.
Back to the original point, 30,000 to 40,000 happy Joe Alumnus gladly let go of $ 100.00 bills for a good product multiple times a season, even if the product has a loosing record, but shows promise by being competitive, & the coach is taking ownership of the season / situation.