Call the retroactive banner maker!

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
If a guy knows or thinks he's going pro, he won't go to class that last semester, or at the very least he won't make an effort in those classes if he does show.

I was told that was a big part of the reason Charles Woodson went ahead and declared when he did is because he either hadn't been to class or didn't want to take fall exams.

A lot of players quit attending class either when their eligibility is up, or when they know they're going pro.

Wall, Cousins, and everyone else may have attended some classes in the spring, but I wouldn't be surprised if you found out that some of them had basically quit, nor would I be the least bit offended.

I still think it's a joke that a guy like John Wall was forced to pass the first semester classes. He shouldn't have even been asked to do that.
 

jakldawg

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
4,374
0
36
that they shouldn't have to pass any classes in the fall, and then not even show up for any classes in the spring? So the college athletes shouldn't even pretend to be in college? That's certainly a bold position. Can we go ahead and give them agents, shoe contracts, and Italian sports cars out in the open in this brave new world?

Besides, the starters' attendance in class being, at best, random (with a strong correlation to exam days) isn't exactly breaking news. This is just the first time I'd heard a national media figure run with it. Oh, and I predict that absolutely nothing happens as a result of this.
 

fishwater99

Freshman
Jun 4, 2007
14,072
54
48
RebelBruiser said:
<span style="font-weight: bold;">I still think it's a joke that a guy like John Wall was forced to pass the first semester classes. He shouldn't have even been asked to do that.</span>
If he wants to play in the spring, then the "student athlete" has to pass the fall semester. They have rules for a reason in the NCAA, even though some schools try to skirt them...
 

Seinfeld

All-American
Nov 30, 2006
11,003
6,731
113
or if Cal's crap just goes against Knight's morals, but this isn't the first time that he's called Cal and/or Kentucky out. I remember him doing an interview about a year ago and the main topic was the current state of college basketball, paying players, etc. Knight covered a few different areas, but he eventually said that he had no faith in a sport that would allow a coach to keep on coaching after having two Final Four banners stripped at separate schools.

Cal has that type of personality that makes most people forget about the BS that he's done as soon as he starts talking and winning, but Knight will have none of it and that's what I love about him. Better yet, I have no doubt in my mind that Knight would repeat these exact quotes directly to his face if they ever ran into each other. He may not be entirely correct with his comment that KY's entire starting 5 didn't go to spring classes, but in his mind, he's probably thinking "who cares?" His point is that Cal and every one of his teams get away with murder each and every year, but no one ever seems to pay attention until after the fact and he's sick of it.
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
I think teams in the major sports should have a certain number of positions on their roster that CAN be held by non-student athletes.

Most of the guys are pretending to be student athletes and have no interest in college. If they don't have the grades to get in but have the talent to go pro, or if they just don't want to go to college, why force them to pass classes that they aren't going to use in the future.

If a guy wants to take advantage and get an education, good for him. If not, don't force them to pretend to be something they aren't (students).

That's been my stance the past 5 years or so. Why pretend?
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
The "student athlete" in major college sports is a farce of an idea.

It took me a while to learn to accept that, but it's the way it is. I say they should embrace it and work around it.

They don't require doctors to run a certain 40 time to be able to practice. Why should they force athletes to pass college algebra to have a chance to pursue a professional sports career?

If they want to pursue a degree and be a "student athlete" good for them, and leave them that option. If they don't want to pursue a degree, that's their choice, and if it doesn't work out for them in sports, then they walk away the same as they would if they went to school and faked it through an athlete friendly major like University Studies without gaining a degree.

In the John Wall example, everyone knew he was in school only because he had to be. Some players have decided to just to go Europe these days to avoid having to pretend to be students, but they have to give up some of their spotlight to do that. Why even make them pretend?
 

bullysleftnut

Redshirt
May 23, 2006
493
0
0
RebelBruiser said:
The "student athlete" in major college sports is a farce of an idea.

It took me a while to learn to accept that, but it's the way it is. I say they should embrace it and work around it.

They don't require doctors to run a certain 40 time to be able to practice. Why should they force athletes to pass college algebra to have a chance to pursue a professional sports career?

If they want to pursue a degree and be a "student athlete" good for them, and leave them that option. If they don't want to pursue a degree, that's their choice, and if it doesn't work out for them in sports, then they walk away the same as they would if they went to school and faked it through an athlete friendly major like University Studies without gaining a degree.

In the John Wall example, everyone knew he was in school only because he had to be. Some players have decided to just to go Europe these days to avoid having to pretend to be students, but they have to give up some of their spotlight to do that. Why even make them pretend?
Holy crap...

1) The NCAA is only semi-pro ball because ******* boosters can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that football and basketball are games and not life-and-death.
2) Doctors aren't required to run 40 times but they are required to pass their classes.
3) There is no rule stating that you must play college football to get on an NFL team - but it will definitely enhance your chances. Someone could easily work a job for two years and then tryout for an NFL team if they really didn't want to go to college. However, if they *choose* to go to college, why should they get to shirk the expectations just because they can run a 4.4 40?
 

RebelBruiser

Redshirt
Aug 21, 2007
7,349
0
0
bullysleftnut said:
RebelBruiser said:
The "student athlete" in major college sports is a farce of an idea.



It took me a while to learn to accept that, but it's the way it is. I say they should embrace it and work around it.



They don't require doctors to run a certain 40 time to be able to practice. Why should they force athletes to pass college algebra to have a chance to pursue a professional sports career?



If they want to pursue a degree and be a "student athlete" good for them, and leave them that option. If they don't want to pursue a degree, that's their choice, and if it doesn't work out for them in sports, then they walk away the same as they would if they went to school and faked it through an athlete friendly major like University Studies without gaining a degree.



In the John Wall example, everyone knew he was in school only because he had to be. Some players have decided to just to go Europe these days to avoid having to pretend to be students, but they have to give up some of their spotlight to do that. Why even make them pretend?
Holy crap...

1) The NCAA is only semi-pro ball because ******* boosters can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that football and basketball are games and not life-and-death.
2) Doctors aren't required to run 40 times but they are required to pass their classes.
3) There is no rule stating that you must play college football to get on an NFL team - but it will definitely enhance your chances. Someone could easily work a job for two years and then tryout for an NFL team if they really didn't want to go to college. However, if they *choose* to go to college, why should they get to shirk the expectations just because they can run a 4.4 40?

I understand what you're saying, but the system is set up in a way that there are very few routes to the pros that DON'T include college in some fashion for football or basketball (the money sports).

Golfers, tennis players, baseball players, really just about any other pro sport athlete all have routes that are easily accessible to get them to the pros that don't include college.

That's not quite the case for football or basketball players. If they want to make it, yes they could take other routes, but they are ushered to college to pretend to be students. You are much less likely to be able to sit out a few years and make it, go to Juco and make it, or go overseas and make it.

It's not the boosters by the way, it's the everyday fans that make it life and death and turn college sports from amateur to semi-pro. There is so much money filtered through the sports because you have basketball games with 20,000 fans, football games with 100,000 fans, and mega-TV deals for the sports. That's not amateur athletics, and it NEVER will be again. Baseball and the other sports at the college level are still amateur sports, but not basketball and football at the highest levels.

My point is, if everyone is going to make so much money off these guys by forcing them to pretend to be student athletes, why not open it up and allow each football team 16 spots for non-students and basketball teams 4 spots for non-students just to throw out numbers? Why make John Wall or Derek Rose pretend to be a college student when they clearly have no interest in a degree? The answer is, because the NBA has a free training ground to develop its future stars and give them another year to sort through the talent via scouting at a higher level. They don't want to give that up. The NFL has a 3-4 year developing and proving ground that costs them nothing. The boosters and fans fund it all. The pro leagues have no reason to want to give it up. The loser in it all is the athlete that has no interest in education but wants to use his talents professionally. The guys that have the talent but fall by the wayside because of academics don't concern the NFL or NBA, because they aren't hurting for talent. They could be better with a few more of those athletes, but the leagues will survive without them.

And back to my analogy, what if you forced students to be athletes to some extent to try to enter a professional field? It seems absurd, but it's no more absurd than the culture we've set up that forces athletes to pretend to be students if they want to pursue a sports career.

If the NBA and NFL aren't going to fund semi-pro leagues right out of high school to develop those players, and why would they, why should the NCAA keep up this farce of amateur athletics at the highest level of the sports that make millions and millions of dollars.

Maybe you like to pretend the basketball and football players are at MSU because they want a degree and want to better themselves. Granted, some of them are, but a good number of them are there to get to the league. If they pass enough classes in a crap major to graduate, so be it, if not, they don't care. Do you think Dee Bost came to MSU to get a degree? What about Renardo Sidney? They came as a route to the NBA, because the other routes aren't nearly as likely to work out for them. Why make them pretend to be students when they have zero intention of earning a degree?