And where can I get some? It's one thing to not have state in your bracket. But it's a whole 'nother thing to even have the black bear rebels in your bracket. He has lost all credibility to me. I mean it's been very clear throughout the year. Mississippi State>Ole Miss
Can someone please tell me what Jerry Palm is smoking?
- Thread starter GOODDAWG
- Start date
TEAM RPI SOS 1-50 51-100 101-200 Last 10 SEC Tourney
Bears 60 45 1-7 5-5 11-1 6-4 Semi finals
Dawgs 74 76 2-4 5-5 8-2 4-6 First rd
Their RPI is better and they played a tougher schedule. We have wasted a year of good talent and they have gotten everything out of average talent. This is why we need a change at the top. It's the same thing every year. First it was we need to get rid of Gordon and Rhodes and we will have better chemistry. Then it was we will be better after Ravern and Augustus are gone. Now it is we will have better chemistry after Sidney and Bost are gone. Same story, different year.
Bears 60 45 1-7 5-5 11-1 6-4 Semi finals
Dawgs 74 76 2-4 5-5 8-2 4-6 First rd
Their RPI is better and they played a tougher schedule. We have wasted a year of good talent and they have gotten everything out of average talent. This is why we need a change at the top. It's the same thing every year. First it was we need to get rid of Gordon and Rhodes and we will have better chemistry. Then it was we will be better after Ravern and Augustus are gone. Now it is we will have better chemistry after Sidney and Bost are gone. Same story, different year.
As we have found out in previous years unless you win your conference tournament, the committee doesn't care what you do in your tournament. They even said as much last year. Palm ONLY goes by RPI. It's guesswork at this point.
They are 1-7 vs top 50 and 6-12 vs the top 100. That's pretty bad. Not that ours is a beaming ray of sunshine, but it's definitely better than that. They aren't strong in a single category just mediocre to bad everywhere. Then again, I may be basing this decision on factors (mainly record vs top 50 and top 100) that aren't considered as strongly by the committee. We'll see.
