Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3 Football:
Year 1 at Michigan for Bryce Underwood: Pressure to win or a freeroll?
On3 Football:
Ranking the top 10 defensive coordinators in college football
On3 NIL:
College Sports Commission updates guidance allowing NIL collectives to pay athletes
Alabama Crimson Tide Football:
Ryan Grubb sends message to Alabama's quarterback room
Alabama Crimson Tide:
Ryan Grubb describes biggest differences he sees in Alabama quarterbacks
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Can We Forget The ACC Fantasy?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 131786171" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p><h3>Here's some of the points made in the just posted article:</h3><h3></h3><h3></h3><h3><strong>3. The college rankings formula can be gamed.</strong></h3><p></p><p>Plenty of universities have figured out how to crack the code to climb up the rankings ladder.<img src="https://www.thecollegesolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/northeastern-1.webp" alt="Northeastern University college ranking" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Northeastern University</strong> is one of the schools that focused single-mindedly on improving their rankings. Two decades ago, Northeastern was considered an third-tier, blue-collar commuter school stuck with an unattractive campus.</p><p></p><p></p><p>But then a new college president took over and focused single mindedly on saving the institution by doing whatever was possible to boost its U.S. News ranking.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Six years ago, <a href="https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/08/26/how-northeastern-gamed-the-college-rankings/"><strong>Boston Magazine explored this Cinderella tale</strong></a> and quoted the Northeastern president as saying, “There’s no question that the system invites gaming.”</p><p></p><p></p><p>U.S. News ranks Northeastern, which is now an extremely popular destination, as No. 40 in the coveted national university category. It is tied with such institutions as Tulane and College of William and Mary. A couple of decades ago it was ranked No. 162 and it was rare for anyone outside of Boston to have heard of it.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>George Washington University</strong> was another struggling commuter school that successfully cracked the U.S. News college rankings code and began <img src="https://www.thecollegesolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/University-Yard-UP-2014-JMC_7992-1024x455.webp" alt="George Washington University's college ranking's college ranking" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" />attracting affluent students who could pay higher prices for a bachelor’s degree and, in turn, attract even more high-income teenagers.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here is <a href="https://washingtonmonthly.com/2010/08/22/the-prestige-racket/">a<strong>n article from Washington Monthly</strong></a> about how ranking manipulation catapulted GWU in the rankings. It’s now ranked No. 70 in the national university category.</p><p></p><p></p><h3><strong>4. Popularity is a big ratings factor.</strong></h3><p></p><p>A school’s reputation among the right people will significantly impact it’s U.S. News ranking.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In annual surveys, three administrators from the offices of president, provost and admission at each school in the national university category, for instance, must assess what they think about all their peers on a one-to-five grading scale. (One is marginal and five is distinguished.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here, however, is the dilemma:</p><p></p><p></p><p>What do administrators at UCLA, Johns Hopkins, University of Tulsa and Kansas State know about what’s going on at Brandeis, Case Western Reserve, Virginia Tech and University of Missouri (my alma mater), much less 300 other schools in the national university category?</p><h3></h3><h3><strong>6. Rankings encourage colleges to favor affluent students.</strong></h3><p></p><p><em>US News</em> awards schools which generate higher test scores and grade point averages for their incoming freshmen class, which favors rich students.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This focus on selectivity has been a boon for affluent high school students, who tend to enjoy better academic profiles. These teens can afford expensive test-prep courses and are more likely to have attended schools with stronger academic offerings. There is a strong positive correlation between standardized test scores and family income.</p><h3></h3><h3><strong>9. Rankings encourage admission tricks.</strong></h3><p></p><p>For instance,<em> US News’</em> algorithm favors schools that spurn more students. To increase their rejection rates, schools will court students through marketing materials and social media that they have no intention of accepting.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here’s another trick: some institutions make it easy for students to apply via streamlined online applications, which are referred to in the industry as “fast apps.” Schools use this strategy to increase the size of their student body, as well as bump up their rejection rates.</p><h3></h3><h3><strong>10. Rankings don’t measure what’s important.</strong></h3><p></p><p>One of the perverse aspects about the rankings is that turning out thoughtful, articulate young men and women, who can write cogently and think critically won’t budge a school’s ranking up even one spot. Curiously enough, <em>U.S. News</em> doesn’t even attempt to measure the type of learning going on at schools.</p><p></p><p></p><p>In reality, the methodology fueling the rankings are a collection of subjective measurements that students and families are supposed to rely upon to pinpoint the schools doing the best job of educating undergraduates. <em>U.S. News</em> relies on proxies for educational quality, but these proxies are dubious at best.</p><h3></h3><h3><strong>11. Rankings encourage cheating.</strong></h3><p></p><p>Rankings have become such a high-stakes game that some schools send false data or have acted unethically. And I suspect that most of the schools that are manipulating their figures have never been caught. Those that have been outed in past years include Claremont McKenna, U.S. Naval Academy, Baylor University, Emory University.</p><h3></h3><h3><strong>13. Don’t believe the numbers.</strong></h3><p></p><p>You should not believe that a college ranked No. 1 or 19th or 73rd is better than peers ranked 6th or 42nd or 95th best. I’ve seen too many parents make terrible financial sacrifices to send their kids to rankings darlings when it was completely unnecessary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 131786171, member: 1428007"] [HEADING=2]Here's some of the points made in the just posted article:[/HEADING] [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]3. The college rankings formula can be gamed.[/B][/HEADING] Plenty of universities have figured out how to crack the code to climb up the rankings ladder.[IMG alt="Northeastern University college ranking"]https://www.thecollegesolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/northeastern-1.webp[/IMG] [B]Northeastern University[/B] is one of the schools that focused single-mindedly on improving their rankings. Two decades ago, Northeastern was considered an third-tier, blue-collar commuter school stuck with an unattractive campus. But then a new college president took over and focused single mindedly on saving the institution by doing whatever was possible to boost its U.S. News ranking. Six years ago, [URL='https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2014/08/26/how-northeastern-gamed-the-college-rankings/'][B]Boston Magazine explored this Cinderella tale[/B][/URL] and quoted the Northeastern president as saying, “There’s no question that the system invites gaming.” U.S. News ranks Northeastern, which is now an extremely popular destination, as No. 40 in the coveted national university category. It is tied with such institutions as Tulane and College of William and Mary. A couple of decades ago it was ranked No. 162 and it was rare for anyone outside of Boston to have heard of it. [B]George Washington University[/B] was another struggling commuter school that successfully cracked the U.S. News college rankings code and began [IMG alt="George Washington University's college ranking's college ranking"]https://www.thecollegesolution.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/University-Yard-UP-2014-JMC_7992-1024x455.webp[/IMG]attracting affluent students who could pay higher prices for a bachelor’s degree and, in turn, attract even more high-income teenagers. Here is [URL='https://washingtonmonthly.com/2010/08/22/the-prestige-racket/']a[B]n article from Washington Monthly[/B][/URL] about how ranking manipulation catapulted GWU in the rankings. It’s now ranked No. 70 in the national university category. [HEADING=2][B]4. Popularity is a big ratings factor.[/B][/HEADING] A school’s reputation among the right people will significantly impact it’s U.S. News ranking. In annual surveys, three administrators from the offices of president, provost and admission at each school in the national university category, for instance, must assess what they think about all their peers on a one-to-five grading scale. (One is marginal and five is distinguished.) Here, however, is the dilemma: What do administrators at UCLA, Johns Hopkins, University of Tulsa and Kansas State know about what’s going on at Brandeis, Case Western Reserve, Virginia Tech and University of Missouri (my alma mater), much less 300 other schools in the national university category? [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]6. Rankings encourage colleges to favor affluent students.[/B][/HEADING] [I]US News[/I] awards schools which generate higher test scores and grade point averages for their incoming freshmen class, which favors rich students. This focus on selectivity has been a boon for affluent high school students, who tend to enjoy better academic profiles. These teens can afford expensive test-prep courses and are more likely to have attended schools with stronger academic offerings. There is a strong positive correlation between standardized test scores and family income. [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]9. Rankings encourage admission tricks.[/B][/HEADING] For instance,[I] US News’[/I] algorithm favors schools that spurn more students. To increase their rejection rates, schools will court students through marketing materials and social media that they have no intention of accepting. Here’s another trick: some institutions make it easy for students to apply via streamlined online applications, which are referred to in the industry as “fast apps.” Schools use this strategy to increase the size of their student body, as well as bump up their rejection rates. [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]10. Rankings don’t measure what’s important.[/B][/HEADING] One of the perverse aspects about the rankings is that turning out thoughtful, articulate young men and women, who can write cogently and think critically won’t budge a school’s ranking up even one spot. Curiously enough, [I]U.S. News[/I] doesn’t even attempt to measure the type of learning going on at schools. In reality, the methodology fueling the rankings are a collection of subjective measurements that students and families are supposed to rely upon to pinpoint the schools doing the best job of educating undergraduates. [I]U.S. News[/I] relies on proxies for educational quality, but these proxies are dubious at best. [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]11. Rankings encourage cheating.[/B][/HEADING] Rankings have become such a high-stakes game that some schools send false data or have acted unethically. And I suspect that most of the schools that are manipulating their figures have never been caught. Those that have been outed in past years include Claremont McKenna, U.S. Naval Academy, Baylor University, Emory University. [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]13. Don’t believe the numbers.[/B][/HEADING] You should not believe that a college ranked No. 1 or 19th or 73rd is better than peers ranked 6th or 42nd or 95th best. I’ve seen too many parents make terrible financial sacrifices to send their kids to rankings darlings when it was completely unnecessary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Can We Forget The ACC Fantasy?
Top
Bottom