Clay: Cats Are a Disorganized Mess and That's Stoops' Fault

TACcat7

All-American
Jun 26, 2012
3,973
9,127
96
Finally, a media member blaming Stoops for this mess. Meanwhile, Mark Buerger is defending Stoops with his every last breath. Annoying.
 

Shavers48

All-Conference
Sep 2, 2011
2,919
1,345
0
Louisville paper coming down pretty hard on Stoops today too. 'comedy of errors' 'new low point of Stoops era' etc.
 
Mar 8, 2006
3,309
942
0
Truth hurts but we got screwed on that TD pass in back of endzone to G. Johnson. He was in. They have a picture of it on KSR. Next play int.

Curse of the Bear!
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueTick2

irishcat1965

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
19,284
38,795
113
Truth hurts coach. And we know you aren't going anywhere- you have several million reasons Uncle Barney gave you to stick around.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Truth hurts but we got screwed on that TD pass in back of endzone to G. Johnson. He was in. They have a picture of it on KSR. Next play int.

Curse of the Bear!
He was not in. His tow touched in bounds, but then his heal came down out of bounds. The entire foot must be in bounds when it comes down.
 

UKWildcatT

All-American
Apr 9, 2009
75,546
8,113
0
Didn't Stoops get pissed off at Matt Jones the other day for bringing up disorganized....
 

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
He was not in. His tow touched in bounds, but then his heal came down out of bounds. The entire foot must be in bounds when it comes down.
Honest question. How is it different when a player drags the toe? Obviously the entire foot isn't coming down in bounds in that case.
 

JasonS.

All-American
Oct 10, 2001
41,813
7,192
0
He nailed it here IMO:

"On the field, Stoops is an emotional coach who spends a good amount of his time pleading his team's case to the officials or challenging his coaches and players. There's a place for that. There's also a place for attention to detail and making sure your team is managed correctly."
 

ZakkW

All-Conference
May 22, 2002
4,632
4,799
113
Honest question. How is it different when a player drags the toe? Obviously the entire foot isn't coming down in bounds in that case.

Simple human-body physics. If you're facing the out of bounds line and your toe touches the ground then obviously your heel would touch inbounds if your entire foot had hit the ground.

This has been the rule in football forever, not sure why so many are confused by it.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Honest question. How is it different when a player drags the toe? Obviously the entire foot isn't coming down in bounds in that case.
Because his toe at that point is considered his whole foot as it is the only part that comes down. In the play yesterday, his entire foot came down, half of it out of bounds.
 

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
Because his toe at that point is considered his whole foot as it is the only part that comes down. In the play yesterday, his entire foot came down, half of it out of bounds.
OK thanks. Just for arguments sake, if on the play yesterday, our receiver had dragged the toe backward, out of bounds instead of coming down with the heel, would it have been ruled a TD?
 

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
Simple human-body physics. If you're facing the out of bounds line and your toe touches the ground then obviously your heel would touch inbounds if your entire foot had hit the ground.

This has been the rule in football forever, not sure why so many are confused by it.
Couple things. First I don't think the rule has anything to do with whether the player is facing out of bounds or not, and second, I could do without the smartass.
 

kyjohn

Senior
Feb 5, 2003
1,273
508
0
How much longer can UK afford the Stoops experiment? So far he has shown ineptness in hiring,decision making,and pretty much everything needed to run a successful football program.He seems to be Ray,Curry,and Phillips rolled into one.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
OK thanks. Just for arguments sake, if on the play yesterday, our receiver had dragged the toe backward, out of bounds instead of coming down with the heel, would it have been ruled a TD?
Yes. If no part of the foot that didn't touch inbounds first touched out of bounds before the ball of his foot (part that landed in bounds) touched out of bounds, it would not be. But, if he lands like he did, and the part that touched in bounds is the first part to touch out bounds, it's a TD. Sorry, it's kind of confusing to type.
 

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
Yes. If no part of the foot that didn't touch inbounds first touched out of bounds before the ball of his foot (part that landed in bounds) touched out of bounds, it would not be. But, if he lands like he did, and the part that touched in bounds is the first part to touch out bounds, it's a TD. Sorry, it's kind of confusing to type.
No problem, you described it well.
 

akaukswoosh

Hall of Famer
Jan 14, 2006
78,717
119,955
93
How much longer can UK afford the Stoops experiment? So far he has shown ineptness in hiring,decision making,and pretty much everything needed to run a successful football program.He seems to be Ray,Curry,and Phillips rolled into one.
Ray as a former DC had decent defense here. No trace of it now under Stoops.
 

Hjack

All-American
May 22, 2002
79,219
5,607
0
Honest question. How is it different when a player drags the toe? Obviously the entire foot isn't coming down in bounds in that case.

Going to pose the same question. Happens in the pros (both feet) all the time. Be interested to hear the response from those who know the rules.
 

Ugoff

Heisman
May 7, 2009
16,403
21,489
0
Going to pose the same question. Happens in the pros (both feet) all the time. Be interested to hear the response from those who know the rules.
SaguaroCat posted this in another thread.... drag the toe out of bounds and you're good, come down out of bounds with the heel, you're out...

  • 4. If a Player has a “Tippy-toe” stance on the Sideline or End line either from returning to the ground or on the ground after establishing Firm Control, the Player must maintain that stance for the duration for it to be a CATCH. If the Toe touches inbounds, but the Heel touches out of bounds, RULE INCOMPLETE.
 

JRock1966

Sophomore
Jun 8, 2002
1,191
142
0
The thing I don't get is how all this has happened in year 3 when, in years 1 & 2, this team looked so well-coached at times. Seriously, even though we only won 2 games in year 1, the team looked very well-drilled (at least it did to me) compared to JP's regime. WTH has happened?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ukgrad2004

WildCard

All-American
May 29, 2001
65,040
7,389
0
Honest question. How is it different when a player drags the toe? Obviously the entire foot isn't coming down in bounds in that case.

Going to pose the same question. Happens in the pros (both feet) all the time. Be interested to hear the response from those who know the rules.
It is not about the entire foot, it is about what part of the foot touches down and, of course, where it touches.

On the "toe touch" plays the only part of the foot that touches down is the toe, ergo, the "foot" is inbounds. But if you come down flat footed the entire foot must be inbounds even though the toe touches down inbounds before the heel touches down OOB.

Peace
 

HalHR2500

All-Conference
Jan 28, 2002
2,537
3,591
0
All Johnson had to do is spring off the foot touch, it's a touchdown, no need for heel to come down, of course this takes Intelligence, which is sorely lacking