Completely hypothetical question...

[8dog]

Would you rather have Mike Brown back for this year and lose A.J. for good or have A.J. back for 09 and 10 (like we hope will happen) and no Mike Brown.

 

[dawgstudent]

I vote no AJ. I play for now and not next year.

 

[Porkchop.sixpack]

if we can give the rest of the team bullet proof vests........sorry. bad joke.

I think we are thinner on the O Line. Plus, what's to say AJ doesn't screw up again and it becomes a Brown 1 year vs. AJ one year.

However, they are both losses that I defintiely didn't take a "who cares" attitude about.

 

[muddawgs33]

Would you rather have Mike Brown back for this year and lose A.J. for good or have A.J. back for 09 and 10 (like we hope will happen) and no Mike Brown.

I say Mr. Brown. OL like Brown don't come around often, plus we know how good Brown would have been this year, but no one knows about A.J when he returns in 09. </p>

 

[Goat Holder]

Might see it different in hindsight at the end of this year though, especially if we win again without Brown.</p>

 

[AzzurriDawg4]

Of course we would all love to have Brown and Sherrod as bookends...but losing O'Quinn, Fitz, Pegues and Demon after this year is going to STING. AJ can take away half the field and allow us to shift coverage to make up for any other learning curves/deficiencies.

LT is probably the second most important position on the field and there is no questioning Brown's talent - and one injury to a Tackle and we are in some ****. I do, however, think we can overcome his loss - Grimes has done a lot with a little thus far in my opinion and I have faith in him to continue.

Give me AJ.