I mean, they're good in basketball, but I think when you expand you've got to do it on the basis of football teams, because that's where the money and viewers are.
They would make a huge increase in the Big 10's area population. Also, their football program has done pretty well in a very short time. Give them a decade in the Big 10 and they could be a top-25 regular.</p>
up and coming football program that was just in a bowl, a top 5 basketball program, the best women's basketball program in the country, and the NY media market
The only reason Baylor got brought along in the SWC-Big 12 merger was because the governor (as well as another very powerful Texas politician)were Baylor grads and told them they'd better take Baylor along if they knew what was good for them. Look for the Big 12 to add BYU.
BUT... I bet lots of folks in NYC DO give a rat's *** about Ohio State and Michigan. And those are the type of teams that will be playing a train ride away now.
that from a $$$ standpoint, football is BY FAR AND AWAY the most profitable aspect of college athletics.Forbes agrees. This info is from like 2008, but the point still stands.
<br style="font-weight: bold;"><span style="font-weight: bold;">Most valuable college football teams</span>
[list type=decimal][*]Notre Dame - 97 Million[*]Texas - 88
[*]UGA - 84[*]Mich - 81[*]Florida - 76[*]Ohio State - 71[*]Bama - 70
[*]UT - 69[*]Oklahoma - 67[*]LSU - 64[/list]<span style="font-weight: bold;">Most valuable College basketball teams</span>
[list type=decimal][*]UNC - 26 Million[*]Kentucky - 24.9[*]Louisville - 24.4[*]Arizona - 22.7[*]Duke - 22.6[*]Indiana - 19.4[*]Illinois - 19.4[*]Kansas - 16[*]Wisconsin - 15.7[*]Ohio State - 15.3[/list]So you tell me if it makes sense to add a school based on it's basketball program, nevermind women's basketball.
There are over 5 times as many people in the New York - Boston metro areas than in the St. Louis - Kansas City metro areas. So even if they only care about college football 1/4 as much as people in Missouri do (and its not like they wouldn't have to compete against the NFL in those markets too), UConn is still by far the better choice.
having teams #4 (Michigan) and #6 (Ohio State) from that list in addition to Penn State playing at UConn is not going to draw interest from the largest city in the US? You dont think NYC advertising dollars arent going to be thrown at games like that?
WTF is the Big Ten going to get by adding Missouri?