One thing is certain. If Kentucky did find themselves getting pushed out of the SEC if football there's absolutely no way they would continue to be a part of the dumpster fire that is SEC basketball.
			
			Would much rather have VT and VA as they are geographically the better fit. NC state would open up a new market as well and then it would come down to who fits the last slot.As things stand right now, Clemson, FSU, GT nor Louisville will ever be members of the SEC. UF, USC, UGA and UK don't want either of those 4 in and will vote together to keep those 4 out. Odd thing is GT was a chartered member and decided to leave. But if it goes the super conference route that most likely won't hold any longer. Virginia and VT are tied together by their state legislature and how VT got in the ACC. Same deal with OU and OK.ST, they have to be in the same conference. So there is no taking VT without Virginia or OU without State.. VT and Virginia would be a good way of getting Missouri to the West division. Or bring in OU and state and move Auburn to the east.
So, if alignment looked like what fans actually want, instead of what TV people / league presidents want, what would it look like?
Doubt USC would join, don't think anyone has bailed on the Pac-10/12 yet.Hmmm.....Ky, Vandy, Missouri, Miss St, Ole Miss, maybe USC in an SEC division
I like the article and Fickus great analysis. It's interesting to think about and we can only truly speculate, thats what I'm going to do.
1. Conference alignment isn't over, but is that really Earth shattering? We all know it will happen again. I think a better prediction is to say it is over for the foreseeable future. We won't see any whole sale moves for at least 5 years or so. Then what?
While I find it hard to see SEC going to 16 teams, the ACC has 15 now. Would the SEC got to 16 just because of ACC? Well it would be more money, but with the SEC being a communist conference; all that money is split evenly. So would they be making more money in the end? It would depend on what two teams they could poach.
Who is realistic?
Texas - Would be a good grab, but the SEC wouldn't tolerate Texas. And Texas would never want to be in a conference they didn't run.
Oklahoma - The perfect snatch and very feasible. Not sure they would do it until the Big 12 is almost at it's death knell.
Oklahoma St - Would you bring them with Oklahoma? From a TV market standpoint, there's no reason to.
West Virginia - Another good alternative.
Kansas St - If you're gonna take Oklahoma, then Kansas St will fit in. Kansas St would go before Kansas because Kansas is a basketball school and no one cares about that.
Then if none of those are a go, you have your last resort schools
ECU and Cincinnati are teams that generally sell more tickets a season than Vanderbilt. ECU and Cincy are typically pretty good but couldn't compete with the SEC year in and year out, but neither has Vandy or Kentucky. But these two are the last resort.
As far as Kentucky or Vandy being poached, it would never happen. I remember reading an article years ago (around the first ACC conference shuffle) that said UK, Vandy, and Florida would be the schools the ACC would target in a SEC raid. And that the SEC would fight to keep them. Vandy has great baseball (2nd most popular sport in the south) and the grades to boost a conference.
Although I would be up for UK in the ACC for multiple reasons. One being an easier football schedule. I would also love to see the rupptards get butthurt when they see UK no longer playing a cream puff basketball conference that could could care less about basketball. No longer would there be 1 or 2 loss conference schedules. It would be a legit schedule. Also UK would not be the center of the conference. They would be squarely behind UNC.
All that being said, it would never happen. SEC would probably just close their basketball down if UK left. Literally no one cares about it after you cross Jellico mountain.
Doubt USC would join, don't think anyone has bailed on the Pac-10/12 yet.
It's why I thought adding east Carolina to the sec made so much sense. I believe they are the 2nd largest student body In North Carolina.... but they aren't making the schedule noticeably harder. Houston makes a lot of sense for the same reason. TV market and not Oklahoma good.I honestly think the sec is done changing. What school wants to add more football schools. Alabama at the top doesn't want to add Oklahoma, and neither does Vanderbilt at the bottom. All this money is for the purpose of winning football games, so why make the conference tougher.
If anything does happen, the conference would try to poach a mediocre North Carolina (or State) and Virginia from the acc. Way more money in that move anyway.
Before the sun collapses, it will grow to swallow the earth. That's my prediction for the big 12. The Texas legislature will not let UT leave Baylor, Tech, and TCU in the big 12. They add Memphis and Cincinnati Utah State and Colorado state in desperate bid for tv footprint and money.
SORRY i dont give a crap wat conference we are in We are not 2nd fiddle to anyone!! Lol BEHIND UNC the cheaters from the last 20 to 30 years!! Yeah OKAY oh there is another thing titles and all time wins!! KENTUCKY IS 2ND TO NONE IN BASKETBALL ITS DOESN'TMATTER THE CONFERENCE, THE COUNTRY,THE NATION,THE UNIVERSE! KENTUCKY IS COLLEGE BASKETBALL!!
 
	Don't care about bball, but would like to see the 64-80 main football schools simply leave the ncaa and establish their own rules for Football.
QUOTE]
How do you leave yourself?
The schools are the NCAA...the NCAA is the schools.
The "NCAA" doesn't set rules, rules are set by the members who are all representatives that the schools send to NCAA meetings to represent that institution. If the NCAA went away tomorrow there would be another organization take its place. There has to be some central organization that is in place to set rules so there is competitive balance, agreement on rules of play, etc.
Now the Power 5 conferences used to feel hamstrung because the entire NCAA voted on all rules changes but as of last year the Power 5 has the freedom to have their own rules...thus the "full cost of attendance stipends" now being paid to athletes.
Hmmm.....Ky, Vandy, Missouri, Miss St, Ole Miss, maybe USC in an SEC division
As I said...they have already done so.I understand the schools make up the ncaa. The 64-80 main Football schools should separate themselves from the next tier schools. The current make-up of the ncaa is not representative of the special interests of these schools and, by nature, is concerned with the welfare of smaller schools.
The major Football schools, as well as the bball schools could easily form their own group. Forge their own TV contracts, make their own rules without regard to smaller schools. Like with pay for play...granted, there needs to be standardization, but the larger schools should be able to do their thing without concern for schools such as those in the MAC, Sunbelt, etc...
If those schools decide that Football players must maintain at least a 0.2 GPA, that's up to them. If they don't even want to make them go to class...fine. It's up to those schools and their interests.
As I said...they have already done so.
Who do you think negotiates the tv contracts? All of the SEC's TV contracts are between the SEC and ESPN and CBS. The NCAA has zero to do with them. That has been the case since the formation of the CFA that was created in 1977 and ceased to exist in 1997 after all of the conferences including the SEC started negotiating their own TV contracts.
By a 16-2 vote, the NCAA adopted the Division I model released to its members last month (August, 2014). Division I board chairman Nathan Hatch, president at Wake Forest, said the vote “marks a significant step into a brighter future for Division I athletics.”
What does all of this mean? Some questions and (attempted) answers:
Q: What does “autonomy” mean for the Power 5 conferences and why is it happening?
It lets the SEC, ACC, Big Ten, Pac-12 and Big 12 create their own rules — other conferences can adopt them, too, if they want — in certain areas to benefit college athletes. Leaders of the major conferences say they have the resources to provide more to athletes and have tried for years but get blocked by smaller schools. External pressure by lawsuits and Congress has also forced the issue.