Search
Log in
Register
Teams
Teams
Fan Sites
Forums
Shows
College
College Football News
College Football Player Rankings
College Football Rankings
College Football Playoff
College Basketball News
Women's Sports
NIL
NIL News
NIL Valuation
NIL Deals
NIL Deal Tracker
Sports Business
Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal News
NCAA Transfer Portal
Transfer Portal Rankings
Transfer Portal Team Rankings
Recruiting
Football Recruiting
Basketball Recruiting
Database
Team Rankings
Player Rankings
Industry Comparison
Commitments
Recruiting Prediction Machine
High School
High School News
Schools
Rankings
Scores
Draft
NFL Draft
NFL Draft News
Draft By Stars
College Draft History
College Draft Totals
NBA Draft
NBA Draft News
Pro
NFL
NASCAR
NBA
Culture
Sports Betting
About
About
On3 App
Advertise
Press
FAQ
Contact
Get a profile. Be recruited.
New posts
Menu
Install the app
Install
On3:
College Football Bowl Projections Week 3: Full list of matchups, playoff predictions
On3:
Brent Venables' OU overhaul produces big win over Michigan, but what comes next is most important
On3:
Florida's mistakes against USF weren't 'uncharacteristic,' they were emblematic of the Billy Napier era
On3:
College Football Playoff Prediction: Welcome to Oklahoma, Iowa State and USF
On3:
AP Poll Top 25: College Football Rankings see shake up after Week 2
Reply to thread
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Could the P12(10) be more secure than the B12?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buckaineer" data-source="post: 132085809" data-attributes="member: 1428007"><p>Do you know what the article is about? He is trying to pretend PAC 12 schools rated higher than BIG 12 schools because Texas and OU were far bigger tv draws than USC and UCLA.</p><p></p><p>To make his already flawed case he SKEWS the numbers by eliminating the lower rated games (under 1 mil viewers), Doesn't mention that every BIG 12 team played both Texas and OU each year while almost none of the PAC schools played USC or UCLA each year. Also leaves out that some of the PAC schools games aren't rated each year because they are on the PAC network and rated so low they don't count, while only one game from BIG 12 schools was NOT rated on a national platform.</p><p></p><p>But again, tv executives and negotiators will see all of this such as that when Baylor and OK State played in last years CCG, they rated 4 million viewers MORE than the PAC 12 CCG which didn't include either USC or UCLA. And in a NOON game to boot. They'll also evaluate ALL tv numbers along with many other things. And we already know that experts in the field predict the BIG 12 will be at a much higher $$ figure than the PAC will when its said and done--something you conveniently leave out for your shill bosses to try to put down the BIG 12.</p><p></p><p>Stop lying about the BIG 12 in an effort to make your dying conference look better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buckaineer, post: 132085809, member: 1428007"] Do you know what the article is about? He is trying to pretend PAC 12 schools rated higher than BIG 12 schools because Texas and OU were far bigger tv draws than USC and UCLA. To make his already flawed case he SKEWS the numbers by eliminating the lower rated games (under 1 mil viewers), Doesn't mention that every BIG 12 team played both Texas and OU each year while almost none of the PAC schools played USC or UCLA each year. Also leaves out that some of the PAC schools games aren't rated each year because they are on the PAC network and rated so low they don't count, while only one game from BIG 12 schools was NOT rated on a national platform. But again, tv executives and negotiators will see all of this such as that when Baylor and OK State played in last years CCG, they rated 4 million viewers MORE than the PAC 12 CCG which didn't include either USC or UCLA. And in a NOON game to boot. They'll also evaluate ALL tv numbers along with many other things. And we already know that experts in the field predict the BIG 12 will be at a much higher $$ figure than the PAC will when its said and done--something you conveniently leave out for your shill bosses to try to put down the BIG 12. Stop lying about the BIG 12 in an effort to make your dying conference look better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Post reply
Forums
West Virginia
Mountaineer Message Board
Could the P12(10) be more secure than the B12?
Top
Bottom