Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Bell Tolls for Thee" data-source="post: 132091974" data-attributes="member: 1812660"><p>The current Big 12 is equal to the current PAC 12 now that it is without USC and UCLA.  The options available to add to the PAC 12 are far worse than UCF, Cincy, or BYU.  The two conferences are not vastly different in quality.  If we cannot agree on that, just stop reading or responding because you are wrong and too illogical to understand why.  Every team in either conference would jump at an invite from the SEC or Big 10.   At issue is that the Big 12 teams are unlikely to be invited to either the Big 10 ir SEC in comparison to some of the remaining PAC 12 teams.  Hence it would be foolish not to consider the more stable landing spot, even if it is a lateral move, than risk being left in an AAC equivalent conference which is exactly what the PAC 12 becomes if it loses 2-4 of its best remaining members.</p></blockquote><p></p>