Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="skygusty_rivals" data-source="post: 132097473" data-attributes="member: 1500287"><p>I don't know why people think things should have already happened, other than talking heads trying to stir things up for their channel.&nbsp; There really isn't the urgency that is projected. The BIG and the SEC are in control.&nbsp; If in the coming years, they invite more schools from the PAC or schools from the ACC, then the PAC and the ACC and the BIG12 are all going to look about the same.&nbsp; What everyone is waiting to see is the money that is going to each conference/per school in the coming 3 years. After more is known, there may be more movement. Unless you are the BIG or the SEC, there is no other option for backfilling than to expand with middle and lower tier schools. The BIG12 had to do it, the PAC12 will have to do it and if the ACC ever gets raided, they will have to do it.&nbsp; Some of those G5 schools are going to be pretty competitive with middle tier Power 5 leftovers.</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="skygusty_rivals, post: 132097473, member: 1500287"] I don't know why people think things should have already happened, other than talking heads trying to stir things up for their channel. There really isn't the urgency that is projected. The BIG and the SEC are in control. If in the coming years, they invite more schools from the PAC or schools from the ACC, then the PAC and the ACC and the BIG12 are all going to look about the same. What everyone is waiting to see is the money that is going to each conference/per school in the coming 3 years. After more is known, there may be more movement. Unless you are the BIG or the SEC, there is no other option for backfilling than to expand with middle and lower tier schools. The BIG12 had to do it, the PAC12 will have to do it and if the ACC ever gets raided, they will have to do it. Some of those G5 schools are going to be pretty competitive with middle tier Power 5 leftovers. [/QUOTE]

Name