Covid and vaccinations

Status
Not open for further replies.

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
10,041
18,842
0
Thats a misleading article to get clicks. There's no indication that the stores are out of it because people are buying it to use on themselves.

Definitely. Horse worms are surging this year.

It’s totally not because morons who get their news from YouTube videos are using it themselves.

At least they’re not using fish tank cleaner anymore. That was so dumb it was both sad and hilarious.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
Definitely. Horse worms are surging this year.

It’s totally not because morons who get their news from YouTube videos are using it themselves.

At least they’re not using fish tank cleaner anymore. That was so dumb it was both sad and hilarious.
It's summertime, that is when horses and livestock are most susceptible to picking up parasites. It's entirely plausible that a farm store would run out of it. You give it to a horse to prevent heart worms, it's in heartgard that I give to my dogs. It's in medicines people take as well.

Perhaps it's the morons that quickly jump on any story to push the false narrative they like the best.

You want to believe it's true.
 

WildcatofNati

Heisman
Mar 31, 2009
8,183
12,420
0
Definitely. Horse worms are surging this year.

It’s totally not because morons who get their news from YouTube videos are using it themselves.

At least they’re not using fish tank cleaner anymore. That was so dumb it was both sad and hilarious.
The thing about the fish tank cleaner, though, was that a couple of left-wing moonbats were the ones who did it so I doubt that they were taking instructions from Trump. That whole thing was very .....odd.
 

MegaBlue05

Heisman
Mar 8, 2014
10,041
18,842
0
The thing about the fish tank cleaner, though, was that a couple of left-wing moonbats were the ones who did it so I doubt that they were taking instructions from Trump. That whole thing was very .....odd.

Yes. Many morons took it. Moron in the way I’m using it does not have a political connotation. The left and right are crawling with them.

The two cults yelling at each other are the political version of the Spiderman pointing at himself meme.
 
Apr 14, 2003
1,008
220
0
If this is the high demand season for dewormer wouldn't farm supply stores be annually prepared?

you And you can keep willfully ignoring fringe sites proclaiming its benefits for covid.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
If this is the high demand season for dewormer wouldn't farm supply stores be annually prepared?

you And you can keep willfully ignoring fringe sites proclaiming its benefits for covid.
Perhaps, but this isn’t a normal year, supply chains aren’t as reliable as normal. I can’t find 20 gauge heavy load #9’s either. Doesn’t mean people are taking gunpowder to treat Covid.

I’m not willfully ignoring anything, ivermectin has been studied to treat Covid, that doesn’t mean people are buying heart worm preventer to treat it privately.
 
Apr 14, 2003
1,008
220
0
Luckygunner.com
25 for $20 +shipping
70 boxes in stock
Took about a minute, you're welcome.
And you're also fooling yourself.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
Luckygunner.com
25 for $20 +shipping
70 boxes in stock
Took about a minute, you're welcome.
And you're also fooling yourself.
Much like this story you’re missing a key factor. 7/8 ounce isn’t a heavy load, it’s a light load, 1 1/4 ounce is a heavy load.

You also have no idea how big a tube of horse dewormer is, you just saw a headline and liked it.
 

CatsFanGG24

Heisman
Dec 22, 2003
22,267
27,134
0
This came out today or yesterday. Peer reviewed, retrospective.

Does it work? I don’t know. Should the USA have done huge studies on this, HCQ, Inhalers, vit D etc? Yes.

Should people be taking non human versions…no. If you’re open to these treatments, should probably be open to the vaccine as well…and visa versa.

 
Apr 14, 2003
1,008
220
0
This came out today or yesterday. Peer reviewed, retrospective.

Does it work? I don’t know. Should the USA have done huge studies on this, HCQ, Inhalers, vit D etc? Yes.

Should people be taking non human versions…no. If you’re open to these treatments, should probably be open to the vaccine as well…and visa versa.


I can guarantee they didn't get the drugs for the study from tractor supply...
 

SDC8888

All-American
Jun 9, 2021
1,407
8,662
0
Stolen election is the clearest cognitive dissonance test you are ever going to get.

You should want elections that are easily verifiable, leaving nothing to ambiguity or hand-waved explanations to excuse obvious inconsistencies and irregularities, not just take the media's word for it because they said so.

This day and age, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever we can't have one person, one verified vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UK till Death

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
Dude, that's pretty rich coming from someone who still believes the election was stolen.

I'm not saying confirmation bias isn't real but don't act like you're above the fray.
The election was stolen. I don’t believe that because of a news article. I’m sure someone, somewhere has taken horse or dog wormer. I just don’t believe farm stores are selling out because people are treating themselves with it.

There is nothing in that story that says people are buying ivermectin, in mass no less, to treat Covid.
 
Last edited:

CatOfDaVille

All-American
Mar 30, 2007
6,173
8,100
0
The election was stolen. I don’t believe that because of a news article. I’m sure someone, somewhere has taken horse or dog wormer. I just don’t believe farm stores are selling out because people are treating themselves with it.

There is nothing in that story that says people are buying ivermectin, in mass no less, to treat Covid.
You're smart enough to know that confirmation bias isn't limited to news articles. Unless you personally witnessed fraud, your steadfast belief that it was stolen is based on bias because there is no proof of it. Now, you may say that my belief that it wasn't stolen is also based on my confirmation bias, and that may be true, but I have seen zero evidence to the contrary. Hell, I'm sure even Republican politicians don't believe it was stolen behind closed doors.

As for this particular story, I didn't even click on the article, so I don't have an opinion. I just saw the irony in your post so I figured I'd call you out on it.
 

CatOfDaVille

All-American
Mar 30, 2007
6,173
8,100
0
Stolen election is the clearest cognitive dissonance test you are ever going to get.

You should want elections that are easily verifiable, leaving nothing to ambiguity or hand-waved explanations to excuse obvious inconsistencies and irregularities, not just take the media's word for it because they said so.

This day and age, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever we can't have one person, one verified vote.
I'd be inclined to agree with you if it was simply the media's word that everyone had to believe. Fortunately though we also have the word of countless judges, local, and state officials (on both sides) coupled with a compete lack of proof produced from multiple audits and inquiries.

The only people still pushing the narrative that it was stolen are the pillow guy, Republican politicians with something to gain, and folks like our friend Bill.
 

SDC8888

All-American
Jun 9, 2021
1,407
8,662
0
THere's overwhelming circumstantial evidence the election was stolen. You can't prove it though, no, same as you can't prove the election's legitimacy either.

It has nothing to do with confirmation bias. It's not a narrative. When you have a series of highly improbable events, each of which are contingent for an end result to occur, you get an even more improbable event, a more implausible event.

All I want is a verifiable election process, not forced to rely upon the word f countless judges, local, and state officials (on both sides).

They apparently have no interest in designing one. So all we are left with is their word, them confirming your biases and me with my questions left unsatisfactorily unanswered.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
You're smart enough to know that confirmation bias isn't limited to news articles. Unless you personally witnessed fraud, your steadfast belief that it was stolen is based on bias because there is no proof of it. Now, you may say that my belief that it wasn't stolen is also based on my confirmation bias, and that may be true, but I have seen zero evidence to the contrary. Hell, I'm sure even Republican politicians don't believe it was stolen behind closed doors.

As for this particular story, I didn't even click on the article, so I don't have an opinion. I just saw the irony in your post so I figured I'd call you out on it.
You're smart enough to know that confirmation bias isn't limited to news articles. Unless you personally witnessed fraud, your steadfast belief that it was stolen is based on bias because there is no proof of it. Now, you may say that my belief that it wasn't stolen is also based on my confirmation bias, and that may be true, but I have seen zero evidence to the contrary. Hell, I'm sure even Republican politicians don't believe it was stolen behind closed doors.

As for this particular story, I didn't even click on the article, so I don't have an opinion. I just saw the irony in your post so I figured I'd call you out on it.
I’m also smart enough to realize that if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.
The media did more research into this story about Oklahoma than they did on any of the irregularities about the election, and whether you’ll admit it or not, there was a **** ton.

When millions of ballots are unaccounted for, after totals are known, and only in the states needed to win was there huge swing in voting patterns.
That doesn’t even include states just ignoring voting laws.
The Country is paying for it now too.
 

CatOfDaVille

All-American
Mar 30, 2007
6,173
8,100
0
THere's overwhelming circumstantial evidence the election was stolen. You can't prove it though, no, same as you can't prove the election's legitimacy either.

It has nothing to do with confirmation bias. It's not a narrative. When you have a series of highly improbable events, each of which are contingent for an end result to occur, you get an even more improbable event, a more implausible event.

All I want is a verifiable election process, not forced to rely upon the word f countless judges, local, and state officials (on both sides).

They apparently have no interest in designing one. So all we are left with is their word, them confirming your biases and me with my questions left unsatisfactorily unanswered.
Funny that our elections were good enough for 200 years until an idiot grifter (who telegraphed his intentions to claim the election was rigged well before ballots were cast) couldn't take his L and go home.
I’m also smart enough to realize that if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it’s a duck.
The media did more research into this story about Oklahoma than they did on any of the irregularities about the election, and whether you’ll admit it or not, there was a **** ton.

When millions of ballots are unaccounted for, after totals are known, and only in the states needed to win was there huge swing in voting patterns.
That doesn’t even include states just ignoring voting laws.
The Country is paying for it now too.
So all you have is conjecture and your gut feeling. Cool.
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
Funny that our elections were good enough for 200 years until an idiot grifter (who telegraphed his intentions to claim the election was rigged well before ballots were cast) couldn't take his L and go home.

So all you have is conjecture and your gut feeling. Cool.
We never carried out an election in those 200 years as we just did. It would’ve been unconceivable for States to just ignore election laws. we just had an election that was the least secure in history, by design.

It’s not conjecture, what I posted happened. We had a leader in Trump, Biden is a puppet. Literally everything is worse today than it was under Trump.
 

bkingUK

Heisman
Sep 23, 2007
18,693
22,486
0
Biden’s **** up is pretty bad. There’s no other way to put it. Trump was a different kind of bad. A corrupt couldn’t be trusted maniac bad.

Glad we elect great leaders. Can’t wait for Ted Cruz to save America
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
Must be a full moon
Biden’s **** up is pretty bad. There’s no other way to put it. Trump was a different kind of bad. A corrupt couldn’t be trusted maniac bad.

Glad we elect great leaders. Can’t wait for Ted Cruz to save America
Corrupt…Jesus Christ. You got your wish, and now the Country is f*cked.
Our closest Ally just held the POTUS in contempt.
 
Apr 14, 2003
1,008
220
0
Much like this story you’re missing a key factor. 7/8 ounce isn’t a heavy load, it’s a light load, 1 1/4 ounce is a heavy load.

You also have no idea how big a tube of horse dewormer is, you just saw a headline and liked it.
You seem to know everything else, make your own.
 

SDC8888

All-American
Jun 9, 2021
1,407
8,662
0
The broader point is that ivermectin is real, just as the cognitive dissonance there is real - it’s literallysamesame.

Ivermectin is a possibly beneficial Covid prophylactic that is being researched, needs more research.

Buttge media will just tell you it’s horse medicine or a conspiracy and you’ll be done with it, like the selection.
 

CastleRubric

All-American
Nov 11, 2011
5,854
9,925
0
without getting into specifics - our voting system strikes me as a good example of where “low tech “ may be the better approach than otherwise....

i don’t like the idea of electronic voting or any other achilles heel aspect of that process that invites hacking/electronic interference and other relatively easy back doors and network integrity dependent angles

keep it punchcard based and review/update state voter data every year if possible - offer cash incentives and vacation time to employees who find irregularities or errors

i guess there are other aspects to al that but ridding ourselves of electronic/networked voting infrastructure seemed like a bad idea to begin with really
 

Bill Derington

Heisman
Jan 21, 2003
21,353
39,179
113
Fake news. There's sick livestock all over the country, that's why it's suddenly flying off the shelves. Heck, I know a horse who recently got the rabies death jab and one of his hooves fell off!
My local Rural King and Tractor supply is out of it, do you think it's because there's a shortage of Ivermectin or supply chain issues, or because people are clamoring over themselves to buy it in order to take? One makes a good headline, the other is reality.

Ivermectin is given to animals to prevent disease, not cure disease.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.