So peer reviewed scientific studies and the research behind them from leading scientific institutions across the globe from the leading experts in their respective fields can't be trusted because they use fake data (convenient as this is the big tobacco playbook used to propagandize climate change as well) but Jade Helm, Pizza Shop pedophilia rings, murder plots by the Clintons, Trump will be returning to office in
January,
August, any day now... and all the other batshit lunatic internet rumors that float around here are unimpeachable truths because some guy googled them, but the combined works of the greatest scientific institutions on earth that a normal thinking civilized society would trust to invent our medicines, perform our surgeries, fly to the moon, and build space stations... are all moot because before what they say can be true it has to pass the "I'm doing my own research on the internet" test?
I guess we are going to have to add a new step to the scientific method:
- Ask a question.
- Perform research.
- Establish your hypothesis.
- Test your hypothesis by conducting an experiment.
- Make an observation.
- Analyze the results and draw a conclusion.
- Present the findings.
- Wait for the internet Neanderthals to chime in with their google rumors.