Croom Error 2.0

[greenbean.sixpack]

I was going to post, "here we come," but we're already there.

 

[OG Goat Holder]

Yep

 

[beachbumdawg]

Crxxm Errxr 2.X

 

[josebrown]

Agreed

 

[Doubledawgblitz]

Except Croom did win a few SEC games

 

[Lowdog]

And some of Croom players played with passion and fire. Unlike Lebby’s players unless you count incredibly stupid personal fouls. ie; #8 late hit on wake’s QB.

 

[The Peeper]

Moorhead was 2.0, Arnett 2.1, Lefty 2.2, NEXT UP?

 

[M R DAWGS]

Croom was better than Lebby.

 

[HailStout]

Croom was better than Lebby.

Nope. Not even close. Lebby ain’t good, but Croom was another galaxy

 

[ababyatemydingo]

Nope. Not even close. Lebby ain’t good, but Croom was another galaxy

There are definite similarities though. Having major systemic problems and not have one clue how to fix them. Hiring buddies and sticking with them even when it's clear to everyone that they are dog shite at their job. Being friends with players. Being a "nice guy". There are definite similarities between Croom and Lebby

 

[MSTerritoryDog]

Croom and Lebby both inherited a bad situation.

After 2 years,
Croom was 6-16
Lebby is 7 - 17 ( i won’t even count last nights game)

Their offensive styles are very different, but the results are pretty darn similar.

 

[Arnept]

Nope. Not even close. Lebby ain’t good, but Croom was another galaxy

Lebby is 1-15 in SEC games.

 

[goindhoo]

This is Croom part 2 without woody mccorvey

 

[msudawg1200]

Croom and Lebby both inherited a bad situation.

After 2 years,
Croom was 6-16
Lebby is 7 - 17 ( i won’t even count last nights game)

Their offensive styles are very different, but the results are pretty darn similar.

True. For as bad as Croom's offenses were the defenses were halfway decent. The defense under Lebby is comparable to the offense under Croom. Though different in styles they are very similar in results. They just get there differently.

 

[patdog]

Nope. Not even close. Lebby ain’t good, but Croom was another galaxy

They’re pretty close. Croom actually had a better record. And yes, I know his bad Crooms offenses were. But his defenses were magnitudes better than Lebby’s. And his teams weren’t soft.

 

[Maroon13]

Rocky 2.0. Although I'm not sure Lebby will win as much as Rocky did.

Meaning Rocky was too young and inexperienced to be a sec HC at the time. Lebby is to young and inexperienced to be a sec HC as well.

Rocky did recruit his tail off and left Jackie a stacked roster. Lebby will leave nothing because of the new environment.

 

[85Bears]

Team is disjointed, sloppy, no culture, just overall poorly coached. i think Croom is a little better than Lebby