Here's how I see H-F. I wondered if anyone could slow down their offense. LWE did that. Of the 28 points H-F scored against LWE, one was on a defensive TD (69-yard fumble return for a TD). Also, on the following possession, LWE fumbled the kick off. H-F recovered on the LWE 33-yard-line and scored. That means H-F had two other offensive TD's.
IMO, both Loyola and GBW have better defenses than LWE. At worst, they are at least as good. However, both have much better offenses. If LWE could hold H-F to 3 offensive TD's, I think either GBW or Loyola could do at least as well. I also believe they both would have much more success against the H-F defense, although I do believe H-F's defense is improved from the Stevenson game.
What conclusions can be drawn if one accepts the above assertions? Both Loyola and GBW should be ranked ahead of H-F.
I don't think that you can reasonably draw the conclusion that a 33-yard drive is somehow less of an offensive TD. In addition, I am told that, apart from the points, the total number of yards that HF put up was impressive, even though LWE's defense was able to step up and stop HF from scoring. So you can say that GBW and Loyola's defenses might be just as good as LWE's (as you did), but I don't think you can say that they are better.
What I don't understand is where you find support for your statement that both GBW and Loyola "would have much more success against the H-F defense." LWE's offense was averaging 37 points per game, and HF held them to 3. Since the Stevenson game, HF has only given up 15 points (and 6 of those were in the 4th quarter of a blow-out game, thus suggesting it was not the first team defense).
Also, if you look at the Stevenson box score, Stevie only scored 7 points in the 2nd half, after HF made its halftime adjustments. I also know, because I went to the Stevenson-HF game, that one of Stevie's other touchdowns was after it recovered an on-side kick well into HF territory. So it had a shorter field. (And that fact either is relevant based on your 33-yard drive conclusion above or it's not. But it can't be relevant against HF but not for HF.)
At the risk of sounding Domer-ish (which I'm not), I question whether GBW and Loyola have anything close to the team speed to match HF. Admittedly, I've only seen GBW and Loyola on the Cube and/or on highlights, but I've seen HF in person a couple of times, and I just don't see the overall speed and number of weapons that HF has (both offensively and defensively).
It will be interesting to see whether HF will choke against Sandburg and Bolingbrook in the next 2 weeks. Sandburg's only loss this season was to LWN, which has gotten some tiny bit of affection by the voters. So Sandburg could challenge HF. And the 'Brook game will give somewhat of a better comparison between GBW and HF because Bolingbrook will then be a common opponent (albeit a first game vs a last game opponent). If HF cannot dispense with Bolingbrook at home, then clearly GBW is the better team. But what if HF manhandles the 'Brook? Will it matter to the panel?