Actually, while they didn't blow out HC, they also did not almost lose the game. It was a tough game, but GW clearly won the 2nd half.HC did not get "blown out" by GBW, they actually almost won the game. #justsaying
Actually, while they didn't blow out HC, they also did not almost lose the game. It was a tough game, but GW clearly won the 2nd half.HC did not get "blown out" by GBW, they actually almost won the game. #justsaying
Montini would put a runing clock on LWN.
I agree with you on that.
Dino,
My post was not to say that LWN is better than Montini (even though if that game ever happened I will easily accept LWN + 21). It was to reply to Ramblin saying that if you are complaining that LWN doesn't deserve to be on the DSR due to a poor schedule than Montini doesn't either. You can argue all you want that Montini is better than LWN but you can't argue that their schedule is better than LWN. It is not and it will be even worse after the week 9 games.
If I was a Montini fan, I'd be concerned about that schedule. The CCL Green is just plain bad this year. And crossovers against Leo and Joe's? Can you say cupcake city?
Can't argue that but that doesn't mean they are not loaded on both sides of the ball.7If I was a Montini fan, I'd be concerned about that schedule. The CCL Green is just plain bad this year. And crossovers against Leo and Joe's? Can you say cupcake city?
not concerned one bit,this team is loaded on both sides of the ball compared to last years team.And one thing I k ow for sure is that when it comes to playoffs Montinis preparation is second to none.If I was a Montini fan, I'd be concerned about that schedule. The CCL Green is just plain bad this year. And crossovers against Leo and Joe's? Can you say cupcake city?
If I was a Montini fan, I'd be concerned about that schedule. The CCL Green is just plain bad this year. And crossovers against Leo and Joe's? Can you say cupcake city?
I agree that the crossovers are killers. However...
"That schedule" of Montini's included games against MS and ESL, which Montini won. "That schedule" included games against 3-5 Fenwick and 3-5 Rita and 4-4 DLS. Fenwick has three losses against currently ranked DSR teams. Rita and DLS each have two losses against currently ranked DSR teams. I'd love to see how some of those "plain bad" CCL Green teams like Fenwick and DLS would do in the ESCC or in LWN's conference.
The problem with the schedule is it's front-loaded. Who have they played since early in the year? And forget how DLS, Fenwick, Marmion or STF would fare in the ESCC or SWSR. How would they fare in the CCL White? I'll take 40% (St Laurence & BMac) of the White against any of those 4 teams. How many years can that be said? What does that say for the strength of the CCL Green?
The problem with the schedule is it's front-loaded. Who have they played since early in the year? And forget how DLS, Fenwick, Marmion or STF would fare in the ESCC or SWSR. How would they fare in the CCL White? I'll take 40% (St Laurence & BMac) of the White against any of those 4 teams. How many years can that be said? What does that say for the strength of the CCL Green?
Fenwick and DLS would fare very well in the CCL White. Again, three of Fenwick's losses have been against currently ranked DSR teams and DLS can count two of their losses against such teams. How many other schools (besides Fenwick and Rita) can you name that have or will play against three currently ranked DSR teams?
Sure, Montini played ESL and MS in weeks one and two. LWN didn't face anyone like that at any part of the season.
Fenwick and DLS would fare very well in the CCL White. Again, three of Fenwick's losses have been against currently ranked DSR teams and DLS can count two of their losses against such teams. How many other schools (besides Fenwick and Rita) can you name that have or will play against three currently ranked DSR teams?
I'll agree it is a down year for the CCL-G, but not much Montini can do about it. If they played in the CCL-B this year, my guess is 8-1 or 7-2.
It's great that Fenwick and DLS played multiple DSR teams. What's not great are the results. The games were not competitive. Playing tough competition, in and of itself, is not much of an accomplishment.
Hold-on, Fenwick got Blow out by three team in the DSR not beat. they also lost to St. Ignatius. Their 3 wins came against Bowen, Marmion, and DePaul College prep. How would they do in the ESCC...Losses to Benet, ND, MCC, JCA, Marist, and Naz for sure, CoM and St. Pats is a pickem', and likely wins over St V and Marian.
I think you will find, come playoff time, that Thornton was a quality win.Sure, Montini played ESL and MS in weeks one and two. LWN didn't face anyone like that at any part of the season.
Pickem? Didn't Fenwick beat Carmel AT Carmel TWICE last year? Wasn't Carmel 7-5 last year? That's 40% of Carmel's five losses coming at the hands of Fenwick!
Let's look at Phillips, a common DSR opponent of this year's Carmel and Fenwick squads. Phillips beat Fenwick 40-16 in week one and Carmel 41-7 in week 2.
And didn't Pat's lose by 8 to Carmel this year?
And you want to call those games pickems?
Right there I should say case closed. But, tell you what, let's have this year's Fenwick squad play Nazareth's 2015 schedule. I say that Fenwick makes the playoffs playing Nazareth's schedule. 5-4 at a minimum.
Case closed.
I think you will find, come playoff time, that Thornton was a quality win.
I sure can argue that Montini's schedule is better than LWN's.
First of all, let me just put it out there that Montini goes undefeated playing LWN's schedule, and they do so in a much more convincing fashion. Bronco would also have no problem with LWN.
MS goes undefeated playing LWN's schedule. Assuming no teacher strike, ESL goes 8-1 or better playing LWN's schedule. Rita goes from being 3-6 in the CCL to at least 6-3 playing LWN's schedule. LWN's conference counterpart B-B will likely finish at 6-3. B-B beat DLS by 6, so I'm going to say that DLS finishes with a similar record playing LWN's schedule. Fenwick at 3-5 is another one of those teams that looks like they are having an off year. But, three of those five losses have come at the hands of Phillips, Loyola and Montini (all three of which are ranked in the DSR this week). How many DSR opponents will LWN play this year? I think the Friars would take LWN's schedule over their schedule in a heartbeat.
If you just look at records, then you are saying that 3-5 Andrew and 3-5 Rita are the same and you look stupid saying that because it shows you don't really know the local high school football scene.
You're silly...last years teams from CoM and Fenwick have nothing to do with this years teams. With Naz's schedule I'd say they go 3-6 or 4-5 at best and still miss the playoffs. lets be honest we could debate this all day and get nowhere but you put it out there with no ability to prove they'd be more successful in the ESCC. They simply would not is my opinion and you already stated yours. STALEMATE!
In regards to MS, yes they are the best team on both schedules. You want to argue they go 9 - 0 on the LWN schedule, no arguments here. I don't think this MS is as good as MS past, but they are still really good.
You want to argue Montini goes 9 - 0 on the LWN schedule, less confidence than MS but maybe they do.
Oh, but they do. Same coaches. Many of the same players. Both teams faring worse this year than last. They actually have quite a bit in common, not to mention that fact that Fenwick fared better against a common DSR opponent.
Playing Naz's schedule, Fenwick would beat Bloomington, Leo, Viator and Marian FOR SURE. They would also likely beat Pat's. There's your 5-4 right there. 3-6? TOO funny!
It also shows you missing a #8 ranked team
Wow...that's a strong statement. I'll say this. I like your projected draw in 6A North. It's ironic that in getting bumped up to 6A, Montini now has what looks like a much easier road to the finals than SHG, who benefited from a much easier draw in 5A South the last few years. 6A South is loaded with possible land mines for SHG. In the North? Other than possibly Prairie Ridge, not seeing many challenges for the Broncos.
CG and PR in that North bracket. Trust me, no one will be looking ahead. It will be good for SHG to have to play more than a quarter in their trip to DeKalb. I think they can make it, but LWN won't go down without a fight. They are solid.
CG and PR in that North bracket. Trust me, no one will be looking ahead. It will be good for SHG to have to play more than a quarter in their trip to DeKalb. I think they can make it, but LWN won't go down without a fight. They are solid.
Again this makes them at best 4-5 because I don't believe they can beat St Pats this year."
That would be the same St. Pat's that couldn't manage more than 13 pts against a 1-7 Viator last weekend. Do you think that Pat's could notch two TDs and a FG on Phillips like Fenwick did? Carmel only managed one late game score against Phillips. Could Pat's could do better?
This is the same St. Pat's that gave up 42 pts to a 3-5 Carmel (whose three wins came against teams with a combined 5-19 record).
Pat's will likely finish 1-6 in the ESCC...without having to play JCA! And you think Pat's would beat Fenwick?
You are delusional.
That would be the same St. Pat's that couldn't manage more than 13 pts against a 1-7 Viator last weekend. Do you think that Pat's could notch two TDs and a FG on Phillips like Fenwick did? Carmel only managed one late game score against Phillips. Could Pat's could do better?
This is the same St. Pat's that gave up 42 pts to a 3-5 Carmel (whose three wins came against teams with a combined 5-19 record).
Pat's will likely finish 1-6 in the ESCC...without having to play JCA! And you think Pat's would beat Fenwick?
You are delusional.
Well Fenwick did lose to Ignatius who got beat soundly by a Tinley Park team that will take 3rd or 4th in the SSC Blue.
Ramblin'
You are the Charlie Sheen of the Edgytim boards...CONGRATS
Obviously, this means you have nothing more to add to the argument -- nothing substantive to rebut my points.
Winning!
Obviously, this means you have nothing more to add to the argument -- nothing substantive to rebut my points.
Winning!
Ramblin'
Not gonna waste any more of my time. MC140 had it covered. As Gooms pointed out in another thread, your kinda getting to be like a Jr version or IG88 or GD93 or whatever name he's using today!