Darn

[chroix]

You really hate to see it. Hahahahahahahaha!

 

[Nuke99m.]

Alex Afari too.

 

[Pygmy Sasquatch]

 

[chroix]

Alex Afari too.

That is not good.

 

[Cats_2010]

Big loss for the defense but they will be fine without him. He had 8 tackles in 2 games. His presence will be missed more on the field than his production so far this year. And that is not to slight him in the least. He’s a great player.

 

[Anon668007]

So I guess we will have to forfeit games?

 

[HRPopeNstuff]

So I guess we will have to forfeit games?

Doubtful. Unless we continue to let him play.

 

[Supafuzz75]

Big loss for the defense but they will be fine without him. He had 8 tackles in 2 games. His presence will be missed more on the field than his production so far this year. And that is not to slight him in the least. He’s a great player.

Had 11 total 6 solo.. Had 8 last week which lead the team in tackles..

 

[OliverSimmonsTwinBrother]

Alex Afari too.

Maybe it's time for his twin brother Alexi Afari to play? It's 2023, anyone can be who they want to anymore so he could claim to be his own twin and get 5 more years.

 

[Goingfor9]

Doubtful. Unless we continue to let him play.

If the NCAA says he’s an eligible and a judge grant eligibility than later is overturned. That means a player was in eligible the entire time. Whether the NCAA enforces it or not will be a different story. But if they want they could vacate wins.

 

[UKWildcats1987]

If the NCAA says he’s an eligible and a judge grant eligibility than later is overturned. That means a player was in eligible the entire time. Whether the NCAA enforces it or not will be a different story. But if they want they could vacate wins.

They didnt do nothing to Alabama basketball last year. They wont here either.

 

[TarHeelInCharlotte]

If the NCAA says he’s an eligible and a judge grant eligibility than later is overturned. That means a player was in eligible the entire time. Whether the NCAA enforces it or not will be a different story. But if they want they could vacate wins.

That's not how this works at all. If a court injunction made him eligible, then he's eligible until a court changes that. Playing him during the period of the injunction is not a violation and games do not have to be vacated.

 

[Blues10]

Can there be another type of injunction?
It’s time for the NCAA to go away!!

 

[HRPopeNstuff]

If the NCAA says he’s an eligible and a judge grant eligibility than later is overturned. That means a player was in eligible the entire time. Whether the NCAA enforces it or not will be a different story. But if they want they could vacate wins.

It's my understanding a judge said he was eligible and the NCAA appealed that. While the appeal was pending he would be eligible I believe.